157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32184984)
1. Sexual selection on bushcricket genitalia operates in a mosaic pattern.
Wulff NC; Lehmann GUC
Ecol Evol; 2020 Mar; 10(5):2320-2338. PubMed ID: 32184984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Copulatory courtship by bushcricket genital titillators revealed by functional morphology, μCT scanning for 3D reconstruction and female sense structures.
Wulff NC; Lehmann AW; Hipsley CA; Lehmann GU
Arthropod Struct Dev; 2015 Jul; 44(4):388-97. PubMed ID: 26014975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Female perception of copulatory courtship by male titillators in a bushcricket.
Wulff NC; Schöneich S; Lehmann GUC
Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Aug; 285(1884):. PubMed ID: 30111598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Copulatory courtship by internal genitalia in bushcrickets.
Wulff NC; van de Kamp T; Dos Santos Rolo T; Baumbach T; Lehmann GU
Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():42345. PubMed ID: 28169372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Demonstrating sexual selection by cryptic female choice on male genitalia: What is enough?
Eberhard WG; Lehmann GUC
Evolution; 2019 Dec; 73(12):2415-2435. PubMed ID: 31599962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
Fedina TY; Lewis SM
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increased copulation duration before ejaculate transfer is associated with larger spermatophores, and male genital titillators, across bushcricket taxa.
Vahed K; Lehmann AW; Gilbert JD; Lehmann GU
J Evol Biol; 2011 Sep; 24(9):1960-8. PubMed ID: 21658143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sexual coevolution of spermatophore envelopes and female genital traits in butterflies: Evidence of male coercion?
Sánchez V; Cordero C
PeerJ; 2014; 2():e247. PubMed ID: 24498577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The evolution of female-biased genital diversity in bedbugs (Cimicidae).
Roth S; Siva-Jothy MT; Balvín O; Morrow EH; Willassen E; Reinhardt K
Evolution; 2024 Feb; 78(2):329-341. PubMed ID: 38006287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative genetic insights into the coevolutionary dynamics of male and female genitalia.
Evans JP; van Lieshout E; Gasparini C
Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Jul; 280(1763):20130749. PubMed ID: 23720546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The evolution of a female genital trait widely distributed in the Lepidoptera: comparative evidence for an effect of sexual coevolution.
Sánchez V; Hernández-Baños BE; Cordero C
PLoS One; 2011; 6(8):e22642. PubMed ID: 21857941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rapid divergent evolution of sexual morphology: comparative tests of antagonistic coevolution and traditional female choice.
Eberhard WG
Evolution; 2004 Sep; 58(9):1947-70. PubMed ID: 15521454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evolution of genitalia: theories, evidence, and new directions.
Eberhard WG
Genetica; 2010 Jan; 138(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 19308664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Female genital morphology and mating behavior of Orchestina (Arachnida: Araneae: Oonopidae).
Burger M; Izquierdo M; Carrera P
Zoology (Jena); 2010 Mar; 113(2):100-9. PubMed ID: 20138745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanisms and Evidence of Genital Coevolution: The Roles of Natural Selection, Mate Choice, and Sexual Conflict.
Brennan PL; Prum RO
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol; 2015 Jul; 7(7):a017749. PubMed ID: 26134314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Morphology and function of male genitalia (spermatophores) in Euscorpius italicus (Euscorpiidae, Scorpiones): complex spermatophore structures enable safe sperm transfer.
Jacob A; Gantenbein I; Braunwalder ME; Nentwig W; Kropf C
J Morphol; 2004 Apr; 260(1):72-84. PubMed ID: 15052598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rapid diversification of male genitalia and mating strategies in Ohomopterus ground beetles.
Takami Y; Sota T
J Evol Biol; 2007 Jul; 20(4):1385-95. PubMed ID: 17584233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Experimental evolution reveals divergence in female genital teeth morphology in response to sexual conflict intensity in a moth.
McNamara KB; Dougherty LR; Wedell N; Simmons LW
J Evol Biol; 2019 May; 32(5):519-524. PubMed ID: 30758880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sexually antagonistic coevolution in insects is associated with only limited morphological diversity.
Eberhard W
J Evol Biol; 2006 May; 19(3):657-81. PubMed ID: 16674564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intersexual arms race? Genital coevolution in nephilid spiders (Araneae, Nephilidae).
Kuntner M; Coddington JA; Schneider JM
Evolution; 2009 Jun; 63(6):1451-63. PubMed ID: 19492993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
