BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3218500)

  • 1. [Evaluation of and trends in hearing surveillance programs in industry].
    Malchaire J
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1988; 42(4):529-37. PubMed ID: 3218500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Noise-induced hearing loss: are health service surveillance programs always effective?].
    Perbellini L; Veronese N; Raineri E; Rava M; Riolfi A
    Med Lav; 2009; 100 Suppl 1():20-3. PubMed ID: 19848096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The contribution of focus groups in the evaluation of hearing conservation program (HCP) effectiveness.
    Prince MM; Colligan MJ; Stephenson CM; Bischoff BJ
    J Safety Res; 2004; 35(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 14992850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Medical surveillance of occupational hearing loss].
    Idoate Carvajal M
    Rev Sanid Hig Publica (Madr); 1990; 64(11-12):599-612. PubMed ID: 2151868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Audiometric surveillance of occupational environment].
    Kolstad HA; Rasmussen K
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2001 Mar; 163(11):1557-60. PubMed ID: 11268809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Standard threshold shift criteria. An investigation of the most reliable indicator of noise-induced hearing loss.
    Lane CL; Dobie RA; Crawford DR; Morgan MS
    J Occup Med; 1985 Jan; 27(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 3968596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Critical analysis of the effectiveness of secondary prevention of occupational hearing loss.
    Hétu R
    J Occup Med; 1979 Apr; 21(4):251-4. PubMed ID: 438914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A computerized system for the protection of the hearing of workers exposed to noise].
    Sliwińska-Kowalska M; Sułkowski W; Jurewicz B; Chrześcijanek M
    Med Pr; 1992; 43(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 1453943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noise and hearing loss in firefighting.
    Tubbs RL
    Occup Med; 1995; 10(4):843-56. PubMed ID: 8903753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Extended high frequency audiometry in the prevention of noise-induced hearing loss].
    Somma G; Coppeta L; Magrini A; Parrella M; Cappelletti MC; Gardi S; Messina M; Bergamaschi A;
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2007; 29(3 Suppl):258-60. PubMed ID: 18409674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The otologic referral criteria for occupational hearing conservation programs. Medical Aspects of noise Committee. American Council of Otolaryngology.
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1979 Aug; 12(3):635-6. PubMed ID: 471508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Deterioration of noise-induced hearing loss among bottling factory workers.
    Ologe FE; Olajide TG; Nwawolo CC; Oyejola BA
    J Laryngol Otol; 2008 Aug; 122(8):786-94. PubMed ID: 17666128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Our audiometric criteria for the prevention of occupational hearing disorders].
    Tománek R; Sedlmajerová D
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1983 Jul; 32(4):230-8. PubMed ID: 6627462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Role of the Professional Supervisor in the Audiometric Testing Component of Hearing Conservation Programs.
    Mirza RA; Kirchner DB;
    J Occup Environ Med; 2018 Sep; 60(9):e502-e506. PubMed ID: 30095586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ambient noise levels in mobile audiometric testing facilities: compliance with industry standards.
    Lankford JE; Perrone DC; Thunder TD
    AAOHN J; 1999 Apr; 47(4):163-7. PubMed ID: 10418346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Dosimetric evaluation of noise and results of the audiometric examination of a selected group of workers in the refinery-petrochemical industry].
    Latkowski B; Zalewski P; Sułkowski W; Puzio J
    Med Pr; 1987; 38(6):466-70. PubMed ID: 3451021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability and validity of industrial audiometry: implications for hearing conservation program design.
    Dobie RA
    Laryngoscope; 1983 Jul; 93(7):906-27. PubMed ID: 6865627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of hearing conservation programs on incidence of noise-induced hearing loss in Canadian workers.
    Davies H; Marion S; Teschke K
    Am J Ind Med; 2008 Dec; 51(12):923-31. PubMed ID: 18726988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audiometric programs' value rising with hearing loss claims.
    Robinette MS
    Occup Health Saf; 1984 Feb; ():23-4. PubMed ID: 6709248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating tinnitus in industrial hearing loss prevention programs.
    Steinmetz LG; Zeigelboim BS; Lacerda AB; Morata TC; Marques JM
    Int Tinnitus J; 2008; 14(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 19205168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.