These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32185353)
21. Validation of five minimally obstructive methods to estimate physical activity energy expenditure in young adults in semi-standardized settings. Schneller MB; Pedersen MT; Gupta N; Aadahl M; Holtermann A Sensors (Basel); 2015 Mar; 15(3):6133-51. PubMed ID: 25781506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. CHAP-child: an open source method for estimating sit-to-stand transitions and sedentary bout patterns from hip accelerometers among children. Carlson JA; Ridgers ND; Nakandala S; Zablocki R; Tuz-Zahra F; Bellettiere J; Hibbing PR; Steel C; Jankowska MM; Rosenberg DE; Greenwood-Hickman MA; Zou J; LaCroix AZ; Kumar A; Natarajan L Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2022 Aug; 19(1):109. PubMed ID: 36028890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Actigraph accelerometer-defined boundaries for sedentary behaviour and physical activity intensities in 7 year old children. Pulsford RM; Cortina-Borja M; Rich C; Kinnafick FE; Dezateux C; Griffiths LJ PLoS One; 2011; 6(8):e21822. PubMed ID: 21853021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Physical Activity Assessment of Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Using Accelerometer-Based Cut Points: Scoping Review. Moldovan IA; Bragg A; Nidhiry AS; De La Cruz BA; Mitchell SE Interact J Med Res; 2022 Sep; 11(2):e34433. PubMed ID: 36066937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Concurrent validity of the Fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. Redenius N; Kim Y; Byun W BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):29. PubMed ID: 30732582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accelerometer Data Collection and Processing Criteria to Assess Physical Activity and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Practical Considerations. Migueles JH; Cadenas-Sanchez C; Ekelund U; Delisle Nyström C; Mora-Gonzalez J; Löf M; Labayen I; Ruiz JR; Ortega FB Sports Med; 2017 Sep; 47(9):1821-1845. PubMed ID: 28303543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Location-Based Objective Assessment of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Ambulatory Hemodialysis Patients. More KM; Blanchard C; Theou O; Cranston A; Vinson AJ; Dipchand C; Kiberd B; Tennankore KK Can J Kidney Health Dis; 2019; 6():2054358119872967. PubMed ID: 31497306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of Sedentary Estimates between activPAL and Hip- and Wrist-Worn ActiGraph. Koster A; Shiroma EJ; Caserotti P; Matthews CE; Chen KY; Glynn NW; Harris TB Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Aug; 48(8):1514-1522. PubMed ID: 27031744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of accelerometer data processing decisions on the sample size, wear time and physical activity level of a large cohort study. Keadle SK; Shiroma EJ; Freedson PS; Lee IM BMC Public Health; 2014 Nov; 14():1210. PubMed ID: 25421941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Predictive validity and classification accuracy of ActiGraph energy expenditure equations and cut-points in young children. Janssen X; Cliff DP; Reilly JJ; Hinkley T; Jones RA; Batterham M; Ekelund U; Brage S; Okely AD PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e79124. PubMed ID: 24244433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of Wrist Accelerometer Cut-Points for Classifying Physical Activity Intensity in Youth. Trost SG; Brookes DSK; Ahmadi MN Front Digit Health; 2022; 4():884307. PubMed ID: 35585912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Simultaneous validation of five activity monitors for use in adult populations. Powell C; Carson BP; Dowd KP; Donnelly AE Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2017 Dec; 27(12):1881-1892. PubMed ID: 27905148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of two accelerometers for measuring physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Pfister T; Matthews CE; Wang Q; Kopciuk KA; Courneya K; Friedenreich C BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med; 2017; 3(1):e000227. PubMed ID: 28761711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Validity of two wearable monitors to estimate breaks from sedentary time. Lyden K; Kozey Keadle SL; Staudenmayer JW; Freedson PS Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Nov; 44(11):2243-52. PubMed ID: 22648343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Determining activity count cut-points for measurement of physical activity using the Actiwatch2 accelerometer. Neil-Sztramko SE; Rafn BS; Gotay CC; Campbell KL Physiol Behav; 2017 May; 173():95-100. PubMed ID: 28108333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Generation and validation of ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer cut-points for assessing physical activity intensity in older adults. The OUTDOOR ACTIVE validation study. Bammann K; Thomson NK; Albrecht BM; Buchan DS; Easton C PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0252615. PubMed ID: 34081715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry. Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Feasibility and validity of accelerometer measurements to assess physical activity in toddlers. Van Cauwenberghe E; Gubbels J; De Bourdeaudhuij I; Cardon G Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2011 Jun; 8():67. PubMed ID: 21703004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]