These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32185404)

  • 1. Why some size illusions affect grip aperture.
    Smeets JBJ; Kleijn E; van der Meijden M; Brenner E
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Apr; 238(4):969-979. PubMed ID: 32185404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual illusions modify object size estimates for prospective action judgements.
    Geers L; Pesenti M; Andres M
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Aug; 117():211-221. PubMed ID: 29883576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Uznadze illusion reveals similar effects of relative size on perception and action.
    Uccelli S; Pisu V; Riggio L; Bruno N
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):953-965. PubMed ID: 30683958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Grasping Weber's illusion: the effect of receptor density differences on grasping and matching.
    Anema HA; Wolswijk VW; Ruis C; Dijkerman HC
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008; 25(7-8):951-67. PubMed ID: 19378413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attenuation of size illusion effect in dual-task conditions.
    Katsumata H
    Hum Mov Sci; 2019 Oct; 67():102497. PubMed ID: 31326743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does the size-illusion effect on prehensile movements depend on preview duration for visuomotor process?
    Katsumata H
    J Mot Behav; 2014; 46(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 24446928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dual processes underlie the effect of the Ebbinghaüs illusion on control of grasping.
    Chen Z; Zhang N; Saunders JA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Nov; 47(11):1472-1492. PubMed ID: 34843356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does visuomotor adaptation contribute to illusion-resistant grasping?
    Cesanek E; Campagnoli C; Taylor JA; Domini F
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Apr; 25(2):827-845. PubMed ID: 28853037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping behaviour of children.
    Hanisch C; Konczak J; Dohle C
    Exp Brain Res; 2001 Mar; 137(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 11315553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception.
    Haffenden AM; Goodale MA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1998 Jan; 10(1):122-36. PubMed ID: 9526087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Obeying the law: speed-precision tradeoffs and the adherence to Weber's law in 2D grasping.
    Ozana A; Ganel T
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Aug; 237(8):2011-2021. PubMed ID: 31161415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Practice makes perfect, but only with the right hand: sensitivity to perceptual illusions with awkward grasps decreases with practice in the right but not the left hand.
    Gonzalez CL; Ganel T; Whitwell RL; Morrissey B; Goodale MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):624-31. PubMed ID: 17950763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion on different behaviors: one- and two-handed grasping; one- and two-handed manual estimation; metric and comparative judgment.
    Vishton PM; Fabre E
    Spat Vis; 2003; 16(3-4):377-92. PubMed ID: 12858958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion are ambiguous.
    Gilster R; Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP; Wiesner CD; Ferstl R
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 May; 171(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 16710685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vision for action and perception elicit dissociable adherence to Weber's law across a range of 'graspable' target objects.
    Heath M; Manzone J; Khan M; Davarpanah Jazi S
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Oct; 235(10):3003-3012. PubMed ID: 28721517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of illusory size on force production when grasping objects.
    Westwood DA; Dubrowski A; Carnahan H; Roy EA
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Dec; 135(4):535-43. PubMed ID: 11156317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. It's out of my hands! Grasping capacity may not influence perceived object size.
    Collier ES; Lawson R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):749-769. PubMed ID: 28191987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A temporal analysis of grasping in the Ebbinghaus illusion: planning versus online control.
    Danckert JA; Sharif N; Haffenden AM; Schiff KC; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 May; 144(2):275-80. PubMed ID: 12012166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes.
    Smeets JB; Brenner E; de Grave DD; Cuijpers RH
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Nov; 147(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 12410328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Grasping Weber's illusion: The effect of receptor density differences on grasping and matching.
    Anema HA; Wolswijk VW; Ruis C; Dijkerman HC
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008 Oct; 25(7):951-67. PubMed ID: 18608322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.