BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32185801)

  • 1. Flexible regression approach to propensity score analysis and its relationship with matching and weighting.
    Mao H; Li L
    Stat Med; 2020 Jul; 39(15):2017-2034. PubMed ID: 32185801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the propensity score weighting analysis with survival outcome: Estimands, estimation, and inference.
    Mao H; Li L; Yang W; Shen Y
    Stat Med; 2018 Nov; 37(26):3745-3763. PubMed ID: 29855060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Should a propensity score model be super? The utility of ensemble procedures for causal adjustment.
    Alam S; Moodie EEM; Stephens DA
    Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(9):1690-1702. PubMed ID: 30586681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.
    Austin PC; Stuart EA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1654-1670. PubMed ID: 25934643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Propensity score weighting under limited overlap and model misspecification.
    Zhou Y; Matsouaka RA; Thomas L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Dec; 29(12):3721-3756. PubMed ID: 32693715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Propensity score estimators for the average treatment effect and the average treatment effect on the treated may yield very different estimates.
    Pirracchio R; Carone M; Rigon MR; Caruana E; Mebazaa A; Chevret S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):1938-1954. PubMed ID: 24201469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Propensity score weighting analysis and treatment effect discovery.
    Mao H; Li L; Greene T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2439-2454. PubMed ID: 29921162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Propensity score weighting for covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials.
    Zeng S; Li F; Wang R; Li F
    Stat Med; 2021 Feb; 40(4):842-858. PubMed ID: 33174296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using Propensity Scores for Causal Inference: Pitfalls and Tips.
    Shiba K; Kawahara T
    J Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 31(8):457-463. PubMed ID: 34121051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Causal inference in the absence of positivity: The role of overlap weights.
    Matsouaka RA; Zhou Y
    Biom J; 2024 Jun; 66(4):e2300156. PubMed ID: 38847059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On regression adjustment for the propensity score.
    Vansteelandt S; Daniel RM
    Stat Med; 2014 Oct; 33(23):4053-72. PubMed ID: 24825821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unicompartmental compared with total knee replacement for patients with multimorbidities: a cohort study using propensity score stratification and inverse probability weighting.
    Prats-Uribe A; Kolovos S; Berencsi K; Carr A; Judge A; Silman A; Arden N; Petersen I; Douglas IJ; Wilkinson JM; Murray D; Valderas JM; Beard DJ; Lamb SE; Ali MS; Pinedo-Villanueva R; Strauss VY; Prieto-Alhambra D
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 Nov; 25(66):1-126. PubMed ID: 34812138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in target estimands between different propensity score-based weights.
    Austin PC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2023 Oct; 32(10):1103-1112. PubMed ID: 37208837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-step estimation in ratio-of-mediator-probability weighted causal mediation analysis.
    Bein E; Deutsch J; Hong G; Porter KE; Qin X; Yang C
    Stat Med; 2018 Apr; 37(8):1304-1324. PubMed ID: 29322536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?
    Leyrat C; Seaman SR; White IR; Douglas I; Smeeth L; Kim J; Resche-Rigon M; Carpenter JR; Williamson EJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 28573919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Confounder Adjustment Using the Disease Risk Score: A Proposal for Weighting Methods.
    Nguyen TL; Debray TPA; Youn B; Simoneau G; Collins GS
    Am J Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 193(2):377-388. PubMed ID: 37823269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On variance estimate for covariate adjustment by propensity score analysis.
    Zou B; Zou F; Shuster JJ; Tighe PJ; Koch GG; Zhou H
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3537-48. PubMed ID: 26999553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subclassification estimation of the weighted average treatment effect.
    Choi BY
    Biom J; 2021 Dec; 63(8):1706-1728. PubMed ID: 34270815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Propensity score matching after multiple imputation when a confounder has missing data.
    Ségalas C; Leyrat C; Carpenter JR; Williamson E
    Stat Med; 2023 Mar; 42(7):1082-1095. PubMed ID: 36695043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.