BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32186287)

  • 1. Risk factors associated with early failure of maxillary versus mandibular implants: A retrospective study.
    Chang LC
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2020; 13(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 32186287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 4 mm long vs longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic jaws: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Bolle C; Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli V; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 29557399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Gastaldi G; Felice P; Pistilli V; Barausse C; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 29557400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of mandibular dentition on implant failures in bone-grafted edentulous maxillae.
    Becktor JP; Eckert SE; Isaksson S; Keller EE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 11858576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The risk factors of early implant failure: A retrospective study of 6113 implants.
    Wu X; Chen S; Ji W; Shi B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Jun; 23(3):280-288. PubMed ID: 33724690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws.
    Esposito M; Pistilli R; Barausse C; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(4):383-95. PubMed ID: 25422826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Influence of Prosthesis Design on the Outcomes of Tooth Implants Immediately Placed and Loaded by Means of One-Piece Titanium Machined Restoration.
    Toti P; Marconcini S; Enrica G; Pedretti G; Barone A; Covani U
    J Oral Implantol; 2018 Apr; 44(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 29182488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 x 5 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Felice P; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Soardi E; Corvino V; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(2):149-61. PubMed ID: 22866291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm-long, 4 mm-wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Esposito M; Cannizzaro G; Soardi E; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Corvino V; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 22518377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 x 5 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Pistilli R; Felice P; Piattelli M; Gessaroli M; Soardi E; Barausse C; Buti J; Corvino V
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):343-57. PubMed ID: 24570980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Five-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws.
    Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Ippolito DR; Esposito M
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 31116186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year post-loading results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Pistilli R; Felice P; Cannizzaro G; Piatelli M; Corvino V; Barausse C; Buti J; Soardi E; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):359-72. PubMed ID: 24570981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. Five-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Esposito M; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Di Simone S; Ippolito DR; Felice P
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2019; 12(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 31116187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term assessment (5 to 71 months) of endosseous dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus.
    Olson JW; Dent CD; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 11885175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alternative bone expansion technique for implant placement in atrophic edentulous maxilla and mandible.
    Demetriades N; Park JI; Laskarides C
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 20662673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.
    Wallace SS; Froum SJ
    Ann Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 8(1):328-43. PubMed ID: 14971260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Four mm-long versus longer implants in augmented bone in atrophic posterior jaws: 4-month post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    Esposito M; Zucchelli G; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(4):393-409. PubMed ID: 27990507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rehabilitation of postrior atrophic edentulous jaws: prostheses supported by 5 mm short implants or by longer implants in augmented bone? One-year results from a pilot randomised clinical trial.
    Esposito M; Pellegrino G; Pistilli R; Felice P
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 21594216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented posterior mandibles: a randomised controlled trial with 5-year after loading follow-up.
    Felice P; Cannizzaro G; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014; 7(4):359-69. PubMed ID: 25422824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implant failure predictors in the posterior maxilla: a retrospective study of 273 consecutive implants.
    Huynh-Ba G; Friedberg JR; Vogiatzi D; Ioannidou E
    J Periodontol; 2008 Dec; 79(12):2256-61. PubMed ID: 19053914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.