These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3218672)

  • 1. Three-dimensional measurement accuracy of skull surface landmarks.
    Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1988 Aug; 76(4):497-503. PubMed ID: 3218672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional cephalometry using helical computer tomography: measurement error caused by head inclination.
    Togashi K; Kitaura H; Yonetsu K; Yoshida N; Nakamura T
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):513-20. PubMed ID: 12518942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CraMs: Craniometric Analysis Application Using 3D Skull Models.
    Dias P; Neves L; Santos D; Coelho C; Ferreira MT; Santos H; Silva S; Santos BS
    IEEE Comput Graph Appl; 2015; 35(6):11-7. PubMed ID: 26594956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation study of skull three-dimensional computerized tomography measurements.
    Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Knapp RH
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1990 Jul; 82(3):283-94. PubMed ID: 2375381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of craniofacial measurements: computed tomography and three-dimensional computed tomography compared with stereolithographic models.
    Frühwald J; Schicho KA; Figl M; Benesch T; Watzinger F; Kainberger F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 19(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 18216660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study of cranial anthropometric measurement by traditional calipers to computed tomography and three-dimensional photogrammetry.
    Mendonca DA; Naidoo SD; Skolnick G; Skladman R; Woo AS
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1106-10. PubMed ID: 23851749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Methods of making the plaster copies of skulls for the medical and criminalistic identification of individuals].
    Zviagin VN; Berezovskiĭ ME; Aunapu SA
    Sud Med Ekspert; 2003; 46(2):25-9. PubMed ID: 12866229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of mechanical digitizing with a CAD/CAM system for fixed restorations.
    Luthardt RG; Sandkuhl O; Herold V; Walter MH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 11843451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Technical note: Different techniques, different results--a comparison of photogrammetric and caliper-derived measurements.
    Shaner DJ; Bamforth JS; Peterson AE; Beattie OB
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1998 Aug; 106(4):547-52. PubMed ID: 9712482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement of the margins of partial-coverage tooth preparations for CAD/CAM.
    Denissen HW; van der Zel JM; van Waas MA
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(5):395-400. PubMed ID: 10709519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement.
    Ghoddousi H; Edler R; Haers P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17113754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional cephalometry using individual skeletal laser technology models.
    Z'Graggen M; Schiel HJ; Kunz C; Lambrecht JT
    Clin Anat; 2001 Jul; 14(4):258-68. PubMed ID: 11424200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of cranial base measurements on lateral skull radiographs.
    Arponen H; Elf H; Evälahti M; Waltimo-Sirén J
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 Nov; 11(4):201-10. PubMed ID: 18950316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing repeatability and error of coordinate landmark data acquired from crania.
    Ross AH; Williams S
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):782-5. PubMed ID: 18537868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Morphometric analysis of Cartesian coordinates of the human skull.
    Benfer RA
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1975 May; 42(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 1096639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A fully three-dimensional method for facial reconstruction based on deformable models.
    Quatrehomme G; Cotin S; Subsol G; Delingette H; Garidel Y; Grévin G; Fidrich M; Bailet P; Ollier A
    J Forensic Sci; 1997 Jul; 42(4):649-52. PubMed ID: 9243826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Study of the correlation between the linear measurements of the skull and face and palatal wide and length measures.
    Cordeiro BA; Stefani FM; Goldfeder EM
    Codas; 2015; 27(5):472-7. PubMed ID: 26648219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Landmarks in three dimensions: reconstruction from cephalograms versus direct observation.
    Bookstein FL; Grayson B; Cutting CB; Kim HC; McCarthy JG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Aug; 100(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 1867164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor.
    Redlich M; Weinstock T; Abed Y; Schneor R; Holdstein Y; Fischer A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 May; 11(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 18416750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variability of the Upper Palaeolithic skulls from Predmostí near Prerov (Czech Republic): craniometric comparison with recent human standards.
    Velemínská J; Brůzek J; Velemínský P; Bigoni L; Sefcáková A; Katina S
    Homo; 2008; 59(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 18242606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.