BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32187596)

  • 1. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bevacizumab plus Paclitaxel versus Bevacizumab plus Capecitabine for HER2-Negative Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer.
    Wu Q; Wang X; Zhang M; Liao W; Wang F; Li Q
    Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(4):153-159. PubMed ID: 32187596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bevacizumab plus paclitaxel versus bevacizumab plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (TURANDOT): primary endpoint results of a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.
    Zielinski C; Láng I; Inbar M; Kahán Z; Greil R; Beslija S; Stemmer SM; Zvirbule Z; Steger GG; Melichar B; Pienkowski T; Sirbu D; Petruzelka L; Eniu A; Nisenbaum B; Dank M; Anghel R; Messinger D; Brodowicz T;
    Lancet Oncol; 2016 Sep; 17(9):1230-9. PubMed ID: 27501767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel for the first-line treatment of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in specialist oncology centers in France.
    Petitjean A; Smith-Palmer J; Valentine W; Tehard B; Roze S
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Feb; 19(1):140. PubMed ID: 30744578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine alone in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer from Chinese societal perspective.
    Zhang PF; Wen F; Zhou J; Huang JX; Zhou KX; Wu QJ; Wang XY; Zhang MX; Liao WT; Li Q
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2020 Jan; 22(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 31062173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of Maintenance Capecitabine and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Sherman SK; Lange JJ; Dahdaleh FS; Rajeev R; Gamblin TC; Polite BN; Turaga KK
    JAMA Oncol; 2019 Feb; 5(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 30489611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Markov model and cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
    Refaat T; Choi M; Gaber G; Kiel K; Mehta M; Gradishar W; Small W
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2014 Oct; 37(5):480-5. PubMed ID: 23388565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bevacizumab plus paclitaxel versus bevacizumab plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: interim efficacy results of the randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 TURANDOT trial.
    Lang I; Brodowicz T; Ryvo L; Kahan Z; Greil R; Beslija S; Stemmer SM; Kaufman B; Zvirbule Z; Steger GG; Melichar B; Pienkowski T; Sirbu D; Messinger D; Zielinski C;
    Lancet Oncol; 2013 Feb; 14(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 23312888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lapatinib for the treatment of HER2-overexpressing breast cancer.
    Jones J; Takeda A; Picot J; von Keyserlingk C; Clegg A
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Oct; 13 Suppl 3():1-6. PubMed ID: 19846022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Real-world and trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients: a study of the Southeast Netherlands Breast Cancer Consortium.
    van Kampen RJW; Ramaekers BLT; Lobbezoo DJA; de Boer M; Dercksen MW; van den Berkmortel F; Smilde TJ; van de Wouw AJ; Peters FPJ; van Riel JMG; Peters NAJB; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Joore MA
    Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 79():238-246. PubMed ID: 28245951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SAKK 24/09: safety and tolerability of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel vs. bevacizumab plus metronomic cyclophosphamide and capecitabine as first-line therapy in patients with HER2-negative advanced stage breast cancer - a multicenter, randomized phase III trial.
    Rochlitz C; Bigler M; von Moos R; Bernhard J; Matter-Walstra K; Wicki A; Zaman K; Anchisi S; Küng M; Na KJ; Bärtschi D; Borner M; Rordorf T; Rauch D; Müller A; Ruhstaller T; Vetter M; Trojan A; Hasler-Strub U; Cathomas R; Winterhalder R;
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Oct; 16(1):780. PubMed ID: 27724870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pertuzumab With Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy Compared to Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy in the Adjuvant Treatment of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in the United States.
    Garrison LP; Babigumira J; Tournier C; Goertz HP; Lubinga SJ; Perez EA
    Value Health; 2019 Apr; 22(4):408-415. PubMed ID: 30975391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of utidelone plus capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer in China.
    Liao M; Jiang Q; Hu H; Han J; She L; Yao L; Ding D; Huang J
    J Med Econ; 2019 Jun; 22(6):584-592. PubMed ID: 30808230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Economic Evaluation of Cisplatin Plus Gemcitabine Versus Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine for the Treatment of First-Line Advanced Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in China: Using Markov Model and Partitioned Survival Model.
    Rui M; Shi F; Shang Y; Meng R; Li H
    Adv Ther; 2020 Sep; 37(9):3761-3774. PubMed ID: 32647912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Paclitaxel and bevacizumab with or without capecitabine as first-line treatment for HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2 trial.
    Lam SW; de Groot SM; Honkoop AH; Jager A; ten Tije AJ; Bos MM; Linn SC; van den Bosch J; Kroep JR; Braun JJ; van Tinteren H; Boven E;
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Dec; 50(18):3077-88. PubMed ID: 25459393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of gemcitabine for metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Takeda AL; Jones J; Loveman E; Tan SC; Clegg AJ
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 May; 11(19):iii, ix-xi, 1-62. PubMed ID: 17462169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety results from a phase III study (TURANDOT trial by CECOG) of first-line bevacizumab in combination with capecitabine or paclitaxel for HER-2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.
    Lang I; Inbar MJ; Kahán Z; Greil R; Beslija S; Stemmer SM; Kaufman B; Zvirbule Z; Steger GG; Messinger D; Brodowicz T; Zielinski C
    Eur J Cancer; 2012 Nov; 48(17):3140-9. PubMed ID: 22640829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A cost-benefit analysis of bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.
    Montero AJ; Avancha K; Glück S; Lopes G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Apr; 132(2):747-51. PubMed ID: 22200867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as second-line treatment for patients with HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer after first-line treatment with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (TANIA): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.
    von Minckwitz G; Puglisi F; Cortes J; Vrdoljak E; Marschner N; Zielinski C; Villanueva C; Romieu G; Lang I; Ciruelos E; De Laurentiis M; Veyret C; de Ducla S; Freudensprung U; Srock S; Gligorov J
    Lancet Oncol; 2014 Oct; 15(11):1269-78. PubMed ID: 25273342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cetuximab for the treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
    Greenhalgh J; Bagust A; Boland A; Fleeman N; McLeod C; Dundar Y; Proudlove C; Shaw R
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Oct; 13 Suppl 3():49-54. PubMed ID: 19846029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Neratinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine as the third-line therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Wu Y; Dong Z; Wang J; Fang Q
    BMJ Open; 2022 Nov; 12(11):e065299. PubMed ID: 36379662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.