BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32187609)

  • 1. Effectiveness of Fingolimod versus Natalizumab as Second-Line Therapy for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Spain: Second-Line GATE Study.
    Meca-Lallana J; Ayuso T; Martínez-Yelamos S; Durán C; Contreras Martín Y; Herrera Navarro N; Pérez Sempere A; Álvarez-Cermeño JC; Millán Pascual J; Meca-Lallana V; Romero Sevilla R; Ricart J
    Eur Neurol; 2020; 83(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 32187609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The comparative effectiveness of fingolimod, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
    Boz C; Ozakbas S; Terzi M; Karabudak R; Sevim S; Turkoglu R; Soysal A; Balcı BP; Efendi H; Turan ÖF; Yüceyar N; Yetkin MF; Karahan SZ; Demirkıran M; Guler S; Agan K; Kıylıoğlu N; Baba C; Tuncer A; Köseoğlu M
    Neurol Sci; 2023 Jun; 44(6):2121-2129. PubMed ID: 36689010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Natalizumab, rituximab and fingolimod as escalation therapy in multiple sclerosis.
    Boremalm M; Juto A; Axelsson M; Novakova L; Frisell T; Svenningsson A; Lycke J; Piehl F; Salzer J
    Eur J Neurol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):1060-1067. PubMed ID: 30762259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Switching from natalizumab to fingolimod treatment in multiple sclerosis: real life data from the Austrian MS Treatment Registry.
    Guger M; Enzinger C; Leutmezer F; Kraus J; Kalcher S; Kvas E; Berger T;
    J Neurol; 2019 Nov; 266(11):2672-2677. PubMed ID: 31312958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A longitudinal real-life comparison study of natalizumab and fingolimod.
    Lanzillo R; Carotenuto A; Moccia M; Saccà F; Russo CV; Massarelli M; De Rosa A; Brescia Morra V
    Acta Neurol Scand; 2017 Sep; 136(3):217-222. PubMed ID: 27976804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spanish real-world experience with fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: MS NEXT study.
    Barrero F; Mallada-Frechin J; Martínez-Ginés ML; Marzo ME; Meca-Lallana V; Izquierdo G; Ara JR; Oreja-Guevara C; Meca-Lallana J; Forero L; Sánchez-Vera I; Moreno MJ;
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0230846. PubMed ID: 32240213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Natalizumab versus fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis non-responding to first-line injectable therapies.
    Baroncini D; Ghezzi A; Annovazzi PO; Colombo B; Martinelli V; Minonzio G; Moiola L; Rodegher M; Zaffaroni M; Comi G
    Mult Scler; 2016 Sep; 22(10):1315-26. PubMed ID: 27230789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Second-line therapy with fingolimod for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in clinical practice: the effect of previous exposure to natalizumab.
    Bianco A; Patanella AK; Nociti V; Marti A; Frisullo G; Plantone D; De Fino C; Fetta A; Batocchi AP; Rossini PM; Mirabella M
    Eur Neurol; 2015; 73(1-2):57-65. PubMed ID: 25402749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of natalizumab and fingolimod in rapidly evolving severe relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the United Kingdom.
    Spelman T; Herring WL; Acosta C; Hyde R; Jokubaitis VG; Pucci E; Lugaresi A; Laureys G; Havrdova EK; Horakova D; Izquierdo G; Eichau S; Ozakbas S; Alroughani R; Kalincik T; Duquette P; Girard M; Petersen T; Patti F; Csepany T; Granella F; Grand'Maison F; Ferraro D; Karabudak R; Jose Sa M; Trojano M; van Pesch V; Van Wijmeersch B; Cartechini E; McCombe P; Gerlach O; Spitaleri D; Rozsa C; Hodgkinson S; Bergamaschi R; Gouider R; Soysal A; Castillo-Triviño ; Prevost J; Garber J; de Gans K; Ampapa R; Simo M; Sanchez-Menoyo JL; Iuliano G; Sas A; van der Walt A; John N; Gray O; Hughes S; De Luca G; Onofrj M; Buzzard K; Skibina O; Terzi M; Slee M; Solaro C; Oreja-Guevara ; Ramo-Tello C; Fragoso Y; Shaygannejad V; Moore F; Rajda C; Aguera Morales E; Butzkueven H
    J Med Econ; 2024; 27(1):109-125. PubMed ID: 38085684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Real-life clinical use of natalizumab and fingolimod in Austria.
    Guger M; Enzinger C; Leutmezer F; Kraus J; Kalcher S; Kvas E; Berger T
    Acta Neurol Scand; 2018 Feb; 137(2):181-187. PubMed ID: 29159801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis in highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and rapidly evolving severe multiple sclerosis.
    Huisman E; Papadimitropoulou K; Jarrett J; Bending M; Firth Z; Allen F; Adlard N
    BMJ Open; 2017 Mar; 7(3):e013430. PubMed ID: 28283486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative analysis of natalizumab versus fingolimod as second-line treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
    Lorscheider J; Benkert P; Lienert C; Hänni P; Derfuss T; Kuhle J; Kappos L; Yaldizli Ö
    Mult Scler; 2018 May; 24(6):777-785. PubMed ID: 29685071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Safety and Efficacy of Fingolimod and Natalizumab in Multiple Sclerosis After the Failure of First-Line Therapy: Single Center Experience Based on the Treatment of Forty-Four Patients.
    Puz P; Lasek-Bal A
    Med Sci Monit; 2016 Nov; 22():4277-4282. PubMed ID: 27829656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effectiveness of fingolimod in a Portuguese real-world population.
    Correia I; Batista S; Marques IB; Sousa M; Ferreira R; Nunes C; Macário MC; Sousa L
    Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2016 Mar; 6():41-48. PubMed ID: 27063621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of multiple sclerosis clinical disease activity between patients treated with natalizumab and fingolimod.
    Koch-Henriksen N; Magyari M; Sellebjerg F; Soelberg Sørensen P
    Mult Scler; 2017 Feb; 23(2):234-241. PubMed ID: 27055806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fingolimod versus natalizumab in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility study in Iran.
    Rezaee M; Izadi S; Keshavarz K; Borhanihaghighi A; Ravangard R
    J Med Econ; 2019 Apr; 22(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 30561242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness and baseline factors associated to fingolimod response in a real-world study on multiple sclerosis patients.
    Esposito F; Ferrè L; Clarelli F; Rocca MA; Sferruzza G; Storelli L; Radaelli M; Sangalli F; Moiola L; Colombo B; Martinelli Boneschi F; Comi G; Filippi M; Martinelli V
    J Neurol; 2018 Apr; 265(4):896-905. PubMed ID: 29435643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The real-world effectiveness of natalizumab and fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. An Italian multicentre study.
    Curti E; Tsantes E; Baldi E; Caniatti LM; Ferraro D; Sola P; Granella F
    Mult Scler Relat Disord; 2019 Aug; 33():146-152. PubMed ID: 31200271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fingolimod versus interferon beta/glatiramer acetate after natalizumab suspension in multiple sclerosis.
    Iaffaldano P; Lucisano G; Pozzilli C; Brescia Morra V; Ghezzi A; Millefiorini E; Patti F; Lugaresi A; Zimatore GB; Marrosu MG; Amato MP; Bertolotto A; Bergamaschi R; Granella F; Coniglio G; Tedeschi G; Sola P; Lus G; Ferrò MT; Iuliano G; Corea F; Protti A; Cavalla P; Guareschi A; Rodegher M; Paolicelli D; Tortorella C; Lepore V; Prosperini L; Saccà F; Baroncini D; Comi G; Trojano M;
    Brain; 2015 Nov; 138(Pt 11):3275-86. PubMed ID: 26362907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Natalizumab Versus Fingolimod in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Subgroup Analysis From Three International Cohorts.
    Sharmin S; Lefort M; Andersen JB; Leray E; Horakova D; Havrdova EK; Alroughani R; Izquierdo G; Ozakbas S; Patti F; Onofrj M; Lugaresi A; Terzi M; Grammond P; Grand'Maison F; Yamout B; Prat A; Girard M; Duquette P; Boz C; Trojano M; McCombe P; Slee M; Lechner-Scott J; Turkoglu R; Sola P; Ferraro D; Granella F; Prevost J; Maimone D; Skibina O; Buzzard K; Van der Walt A; Van Wijmeersch B; Csepany T; Spitaleri D; Vucic S; Casey R; Debouverie M; Edan G; Ciron J; Ruet A; De Sèze J; Maillart E; Zephir H; Labauge P; Defer G; Lebrun-Frénay C; Moreau T; Berger E; Clavelou P; Pelletier J; Stankoff B; Gout O; Thouvenot E; Heinzlef O; Al-Khedr A; Bourre B; Casez O; Cabre P; Montcuquet A; Wahab A; Camdessanché JP; Maurousset A; Patry I; Hankiewicz K; Pottier C; Maubeuge N; Labeyrie C; Nifle C; Laplaud D; Koch-Henriksen N; Sellebjerg FT; Soerensen PS; Pfleger CC; Rasmussen PV; Jensen MB; Frederiksen JL; Bramow S; Mathiesen HK; Schreiber KI; Magyari M; Vukusic S; Butzkueven H; Kalincik T;
    CNS Drugs; 2021 Nov; 35(11):1217-1232. PubMed ID: 34536228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.