49 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3218869)
1. Evaluating diagnostic pattern recognition: the psychometric characteristics of a new item format.
Case SM; Swanson DB; Stillman PL
Res Med Educ; 1988; 27():3-8. PubMed ID: 3218869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability (generalizability) of the Maastricht Skills Test.
van der Vleuten CP; van Luyk SJ; Swanson DB
Res Med Educ; 1988; 27():228-33. PubMed ID: 3218861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cueing in multiple choice questions: a reliable, valid and economical solution.
Veloski JJ; Rabinowitz HK; Robeson MR
Res Med Educ; 1988; 27():195-200. PubMed ID: 3218856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Communication skills in standardized-patient assessment of final-year medical students: a psychometric study.
Guiton G; Hodgson CS; Delandshere G; Wilkerson L
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2004; 9(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 15316269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychometric characteristics and response times for content-parallel extended-matching and one-best-answer items in relation to number of options.
Swanson DB; Holtzman KZ; Allbee K; Clauser BE
Acad Med; 2006 Oct; 81(10 Suppl):S52-5. PubMed ID: 17001136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of "war games" to evaluate performance of students and residents in basic clinical scenarios: a disturbing analysis.
Young JS; Dubose JE; Hedrick TL; Conaway MR; Nolley B
J Trauma; 2007 Sep; 63(3):556-64. PubMed ID: 18073601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. It takes only 100 true-false items to test medical students: true or false?
Pamphlett R
Med Teach; 2005 Aug; 27(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 16147803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patient-centered interviewing and student performance in a comprehensive clinical skills examination: is there an association?
Rouf E; Chumley H; Dobbie A
Patient Educ Couns; 2009 Apr; 75(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 19013743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of a surgical pattern recognition examination.
Dunn MM; Woolliscroft JO
Am J Surg; 1995 Mar; 169(3):341-3. PubMed ID: 7879840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved medical student satisfaction and test performance with a simulation-based emergency medicine curriculum: a randomized controlled trial.
Ten Eyck RP; Tews M; Ballester JM
Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Nov; 54(5):684-91. PubMed ID: 19394113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education.
Downing SM
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16078098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clerkship curricular revision based on the Ambulatory Pediatric Association and the Council on Medical Student Education in Pediatrics guidelines: does it make a difference?
Kuo AA; Slavin SJ
Pediatrics; 1999 Apr; 103(4 Pt 2):898-901. PubMed ID: 10103328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attitudes of veterinary faculty to the assessment of clinical reasoning using extended matching questions.
Tomlin JL; Pead MJ; May SA
J Vet Med Educ; 2008; 35(4):622-30. PubMed ID: 19228918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comprehensive undergraduate medical assessments improve prediction of clinical performance.
Wilkinson TJ; Frampton CM
Med Educ; 2004 Oct; 38(10):1111-6. PubMed ID: 15461657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What to do about medical students with unsatisfactory consultation skills?
Dowell J; Dent JA; Duffy R
Med Teach; 2006 Aug; 28(5):443-6. PubMed ID: 16973458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Curricular reform may improve students' performance on externally administered comprehensive examinations.
Damjanov I; Fenderson BA; Hojat M; Rubin E
Croat Med J; 2005 Jun; 46(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 15861525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Criteria for evaluating performance of third-year medical students.
Grim DR; Miller MD
Fam Med; 1993 Jun; 25(6):388-90. PubMed ID: 8349059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between Long-Menu and Open-Ended Questions in computerized medical assessments. A randomized controlled trial.
Rotthoff T; Baehring T; Dicken HD; Fahron U; Richter B; Fischer MR; Scherbaum WA
BMC Med Educ; 2006 Oct; 6():50. PubMed ID: 17032439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical skills training in a skills lab compared with skills training in internships: comparison of skills development curricula.
Peeraer G; Scherpbier AJ; Remmen R; De winter BY; Hendrickx K; van Petegem P; Weyler J; Bossaert L
Educ Health (Abingdon); 2007 Nov; 20(3):125. PubMed ID: 18080964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Format selection in machine-scored classroom achievement tests.
Kolstad RK; Wagner MJ; Kolstad RA
J Dent Educ; 1985 Dec; 49(12):799-803. PubMed ID: 3864827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
