160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32189394)
1. Is it worth carrying out ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion targeted biopsy on Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score 3 prostate lesions?
Kim KH; Ku JY; Park WY; Hong SB; Kim S; Ha HK
Int J Urol; 2020 May; 27(5):431-438. PubMed ID: 32189394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer in magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography-fusion transperineal targeted biopsy for lesions with a prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 score of 3-5.
Hakozaki Y; Matsushima H; Murata T; Masuda T; Hirai Y; Oda M; Kawauchi N; Yokoyama M; Kume H
Int J Urol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):217-222. PubMed ID: 30461076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasonography fusion targeted prostate biopsy finds more significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve Japanese men compared with the standard biopsy.
Fujii S; Hayashi T; Honda Y; Terada H; Akita R; Kitamura N; Ueda E; Han X; Ueno T; Miyamoto S; Kitano H; Inoue S; Teishima J; Abdi H; Awai K; Takeshima Y; Sentani K; Yasui W; Matsubara A
Int J Urol; 2020 Feb; 27(2):140-146. PubMed ID: 31733635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy using three-dimensional ultrasound-based organ-tracking technology: Initial experience in Japan.
Yamada Y; Fujihara A; Shiraishi T; Ueda T; Yamada T; Ueno A; Inoue Y; Kaneko M; Kamoi K; Hongo F; Okihara K; Ukimura O
Int J Urol; 2019 May; 26(5):544-549. PubMed ID: 30793385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Initial Experience with Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cognitive Guided Micro-Ultrasound Biopsies versus Established Transperineal Robotic Ultrasound Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Biopsies for Prostate Cancer.
Claros OR; Tourinho-Barbosa RR; Fregeville A; Gallardo AC; Muttin F; Carneiro A; Stabile A; Moschini M; Macek P; Cathala N; Mombet A; Sanchez-Salas R; Cathelineau X
J Urol; 2020 May; 203(5):918-925. PubMed ID: 31821099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of real-time magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided transperineal target biopsy with needle tracking with a mechanical position-encoded stepper in detecting significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men.
Shoji S; Hiraiwa S; Ogawa T; Kawakami M; Nakano M; Hashida K; Sato Y; Hasebe T; Uchida T; Tajiri T
Int J Urol; 2017 Apr; 24(4):288-294. PubMed ID: 28222486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anterior Localization of Prostate Cancer Suspicious Lesions in 1,161 Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsies.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Kachanov M; Beyersdorff D; Preisser F; Tilki D; Fisch M; Graefen M; Budäus L
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1035-1040. PubMed ID: 29935274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Lesion Visibility on Transrectal Ultrasound on the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (Gleason Score 3 + 4 or Greater) with Transrectal Ultrasound-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Biopsy.
Garcia-Reyes K; Nguyen HG; Zagoria RJ; Shinohara K; Carroll PR; Behr SC; Westphalen AC
J Urol; 2018 Mar; 199(3):699-705. PubMed ID: 28941918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Defining Novel and Practical Metrics to Assess the Deliverables of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy.
Ristau BT; Chen DYT; Ellis J; Malhotra A; DeMora L; Parsons RB; Milestone B; Brody M; Viterbo R; Greenberg R; Smaldone M; Uzzo R; Anaokar J; Kutikov A
J Urol; 2018 Apr; 199(4):969-975. PubMed ID: 28988963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate Cancer Diagnosis on Repeat Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy of Benign Lesions: Recommendations for Repeat Sampling.
Chelluri R; Kilchevsky A; George AK; Sidana A; Frye TP; Su D; Fascelli M; Ho R; Abboud SF; Turkbey B; Merino MJ; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2016 Jul; 196(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26880408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Improves but Does Not Replace Standard Template Biopsy for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.
Hanna N; Wszolek MF; Mojtahed A; Nicaise E; Wu B; Gelpi-Hammerschmidt FJ; Salari K; Dahl DM; Blute ML; Harisinghani M; Feldman AS
J Urol; 2019 Nov; 202(5):944-951. PubMed ID: 31144593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsy Evaluated by Transperineal Template Saturation Prostate Biopsy for the Detection and Characterization of Prostate Cancer.
Mortezavi A; Märzendorfer O; Donati OF; Rizzi G; Rupp NJ; Wettstein MS; Gross O; Sulser T; Hermanns T; Eberli D
J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):309-318. PubMed ID: 29474846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of significant prostate cancer with magnetic resonance targeted biopsies--should transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion guided biopsies alone be a standard of care?
Delongchamps NB; Lefèvre A; Bouazza N; Beuvon F; Legman P; Cornud F
J Urol; 2015 Apr; 193(4):1198-204. PubMed ID: 25451824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Institutional Learning Curve of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Temporal Improvements in Cancer Detection in 4 Years.
Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Deng FM; Wysock JS; Bjurlin MA; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1022-1029. PubMed ID: 29886090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection.
Mertan FV; Greer MD; Shih JH; George AK; Kongnyuy M; Muthigi A; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):690-6. PubMed ID: 27101772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Targeted Biopsies Noninferior to Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Systematic Biopsies for the Detection of Prostate Cancer?
Delongchamps NB; Portalez D; Bruguière E; Rouvière O; Malavaud B; Mozer P; Fiard G; Cornud F;
J Urol; 2016 Oct; 196(4):1069-75. PubMed ID: 27079582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naïve men with elevated prostate specific antigen.
Quentin M; Blondin D; Arsov C; Schimmöller L; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Albers P; Antoch G; Rabenalt R
J Urol; 2014 Nov; 192(5):1374-9. PubMed ID: 24866597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided targeted prostate biopsy: Comparison between computer-software-based fusion versus cognitive fusion technique in biopsy-naïve patients.
Yamada Y; Shiraishi T; Ueno A; Ueda T; Fujihara A; Naitoh Y; Hongo F; Ukimura O
Int J Urol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 31587386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducibility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy: Multi-Institutional External Validation by a Propensity Score Matched Cohort.
Rastinehad AR; Abboud SF; George AK; Frye TP; Ho R; Chelluri R; Fascelli M; Shih J; Villani R; Ben-Levi E; Yaskiv O; Turkbey B; Choyke PL; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2016 Jun; 195(6):1737-43. PubMed ID: 26812301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
