These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32189509)

  • 1. Challenges in the interpretation and therapeutic manipulation of human ingestive microstructure.
    Gero D
    Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol; 2020 May; 318(5):R886-R893. PubMed ID: 32189509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Edograms: recording the microstructure of meal intake in humans-a window on appetite mechanisms.
    Bellisle F
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2020 Dec; 44(12):2347-2357. PubMed ID: 32843712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Energy intake and obesity: ingestive frequency outweighs portion size.
    Mattes R
    Physiol Behav; 2014 Jul; 134():110-8. PubMed ID: 24291535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eating with a smaller spoon decreases bite size, eating rate and ad libitum food intake in healthy young males.
    James LJ; Maher T; Biddle J; Broom DR
    Br J Nutr; 2018 Oct; 120(7):830-837. PubMed ID: 30153875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analyses of meal patterns across dietary shifts.
    Treesukosol Y; Moran TH
    Appetite; 2014 Apr; 75():21-9. PubMed ID: 24342176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mind over platter: pre-meal planning and the control of meal size in humans.
    Brunstrom JM
    Int J Obes (Lond); 2014 Jul; 38 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9-12. PubMed ID: 25033963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The importance of field experiments in testing of sensors for dietary assessment and eating behavior monitoring.
    Doulah A; Yang X; Parton J; Higgins JA; McCrory MA; Sazonov E
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():5759-5762. PubMed ID: 30441644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Independent effects of palatability and within-meal pauses on intake and appetite ratings in human volunteers.
    Yeomans MR; Gray RW; Mitchell CJ; True S
    Appetite; 1997 Aug; 29(1):61-76. PubMed ID: 9268426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomised trial of the impact of energy density and texture of a meal on food and energy intake, satiation, satiety, appetite and palatability responses in healthy adults.
    Pritchard SJ; Davidson I; Jones J; Bannerman E
    Clin Nutr; 2014 Oct; 33(5):768-75. PubMed ID: 24200201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Independent effects of diet palatability and fat content on bout size and daily intake in rats.
    Warwick ZS; Synowski SJ; Rice KD; Smart AB
    Physiol Behav; 2003 Nov; 80(2-3):253-8. PubMed ID: 14637223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chews and swallows and the microstructure of eating.
    Stellar E; Shrager EE
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1985 Nov; 42(5 Suppl):973-82. PubMed ID: 4061369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Listening to music while eating is related to increases in people's food intake and meal duration.
    Stroebele N; de Castro JM
    Appetite; 2006 Nov; 47(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 16723172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Postprandial effects of consuming a staggered meal on gut peptide and glycemic responses in obese women and men.
    Griffith L; Haddad EH; Tonstad S
    Obes Res Clin Pract; 2016; 10(3):264-74. PubMed ID: 26311660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Type of test-meal affects palatability and eating style in humans.
    Guy-Grand B; Lehnert V; Doassans M; Bellisle F
    Appetite; 1994 Apr; 22(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 8037437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Caloric intake and eating behavior in infants and toddlers with cystic fibrosis.
    Powers SW; Patton SR; Byars KC; Mitchell MJ; Jelalian E; Mulvihill MM; Hovell MF; Stark LJ
    Pediatrics; 2002 May; 109(5):E75-5. PubMed ID: 11986481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time-related eating patterns and chronotype are associated with diet quality in pregnant women.
    Gontijo CA; Cabral BBM; Balieiro LCT; Teixeira GP; Fahmy WM; Maia YCP; Crispim CA
    Chronobiol Int; 2019 Jan; 36(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 30212228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eating rate during a fixed-portion meal does not affect postprandial appetite and gut peptides or energy intake during a subsequent meal.
    Karl JP; Young AJ; Montain SJ
    Physiol Behav; 2011 Mar; 102(5):524-31. PubMed ID: 21238470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. External cues challenging the internal appetite control system-Overview and practical implications.
    Bilman E; van Kleef E; van Trijp H
    Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2017 Sep; 57(13):2825-2834. PubMed ID: 26463499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consistency of Eating Rate, Oral Processing Behaviours and Energy Intake across Meals.
    McCrickerd K; Forde CG
    Nutrients; 2017 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 28817066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pramlintide treatment reduces 24-h caloric intake and meal sizes and improves control of eating in obese subjects: a 6-wk translational research study.
    Smith SR; Blundell JE; Burns C; Ellero C; Schroeder BE; Kesty NC; Chen KS; Halseth AE; Lush CW; Weyer C
    Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab; 2007 Aug; 293(2):E620-7. PubMed ID: 17505051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.