These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32191129)

  • 1. The cluster randomized crossover trial: The effects of attrition in the AB/BA design and how to account for it in sample size calculations.
    Moerbeek M
    Clin Trials; 2020 Aug; 17(4):420-429. PubMed ID: 32191129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal allocation to treatment sequences in individually randomized stepped-wedge designs with attrition.
    Moerbeek M
    Clin Trials; 2023 Jun; 20(3):242-251. PubMed ID: 36825509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding the cluster randomised crossover design: a graphical illustraton of the components of variation and a sample size tutorial.
    Arnup SJ; McKenzie JE; Hemming K; Pilcher D; Forbes AB
    Trials; 2017 Aug; 18(1):381. PubMed ID: 28810895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of subject attrition on sample size determinations for longitudinal cluster randomized clinical trials.
    Heo M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2014; 24(3):507-22. PubMed ID: 24697555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Power and sample size requirements for GEE analyses of cluster randomized crossover trials.
    Li F; Forbes AB; Turner EL; Preisser JS
    Stat Med; 2019 Feb; 38(4):636-649. PubMed ID: 30298551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A note on sample size calculations for cluster randomised crossover trials with a fixed number of clusters.
    Kelly TL; Pratt N
    Stat Med; 2019 Aug; 38(18):3342-3345. PubMed ID: 31069820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of non-uniform correlation structure on sample size and power in multiple-period cluster randomised trials.
    Kasza J; Hemming K; Hooper R; Matthews J; Forbes AB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Mar; 28(3):703-716. PubMed ID: 29027505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
    Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative efficiency of unequal cluster sizes in stepped wedge and other trial designs under longitudinal or cross-sectional sampling.
    Girling AJ
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(30):4652-4664. PubMed ID: 30209812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cluster randomised crossover trials with binary data and unbalanced cluster sizes: application to studies of near-universal interventions in intensive care.
    Forbes AB; Akram M; Pilcher D; Cooper J; Bellomo R
    Clin Trials; 2015 Feb; 12(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 25475880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A tutorial on sample size calculation for multiple-period cluster randomized parallel, cross-over and stepped-wedge trials using the Shiny CRT Calculator.
    Hemming K; Kasza J; Hooper R; Forbes A; Taljaard M
    Int J Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 49(3):979-995. PubMed ID: 32087011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.
    Martin JT; Hemming K; Girling A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):123. PubMed ID: 31200640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficient design of cluster randomized and multicentre trials with unknown intraclass correlation.
    van Breukelen GJ; Candel MJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Oct; 24(5):540-56. PubMed ID: 21937473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of missing data on design efficiency in repeated cross-sectional multi-period two-arm parallel cluster randomized trials.
    Moerbeek M
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Aug; 53(4):1731-1745. PubMed ID: 33528816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample size calculations for 3-level cluster randomized trials.
    Teerenstra S; Moerbeek M; van Achterberg T; Pelzer BJ; Borm GF
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):486-95. PubMed ID: 18827041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cluster randomised trials with different numbers of measurements at baseline and endline: Sample size and optimal allocation.
    Copas AJ; Hooper R
    Clin Trials; 2020 Feb; 17(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31580144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Empirical power and sample size calculations for cluster-randomized and cluster-randomized crossover studies.
    Reich NG; Myers JA; Obeng D; Milstone AM; Perl TM
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e35564. PubMed ID: 22558168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accounting for a decaying correlation structure in cluster randomized trials with continuous recruitment.
    Grantham KL; Kasza J; Heritier S; Hemming K; Forbes AB
    Stat Med; 2019 May; 38(11):1918-1934. PubMed ID: 30663132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Design and analysis of a 2-year parallel follow-up of repeated ivermectin mass drug administrations for control of malaria: Small sample considerations for cluster-randomized trials with count data.
    Jackson CL; Colborn K; Gao D; Rao S; Slater HC; Parikh S; Foy BD; Kittelson J
    Clin Trials; 2021 Oct; 18(5):582-593. PubMed ID: 34218684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-efficient designs for three-arm trials with treatment delivered by health professionals: Sample sizes for a combination of nested and crossed designs.
    Moerbeek M
    Clin Trials; 2018 Apr; 15(2):169-177. PubMed ID: 29316807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.