285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32192081)
1. Assessment of DCE Utility for PCa Diagnosis Using PI-RADS v2.1: Effects on Diagnostic Accuracy and Reproducibility.
Brancato V; Di Costanzo G; Basso L; Tramontano L; Puglia M; Ragozzino A; Cavaliere AC
Diagnostics (Basel); 2020 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 32192081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Biparametric and Multiparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2.1.
Tamada T; Kido A; Yamamoto A; Takeuchi M; Miyaji Y; Moriya T; Sone T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Jan; 53(1):283-291. PubMed ID: 32614123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of biparametric and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Xu L; Zhang G; Shi B; Liu Y; Zou T; Yan W; Xiao Y; Xue H; Feng F; Lei J; Jin Z; Sun H
Cancer Imaging; 2019 Dec; 19(1):90. PubMed ID: 31864408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate cancer detection with biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) by readers with different experience: performance and comparison with multiparametric (mpMRI).
Gatti M; Faletti R; Calleris G; Giglio J; Berzovini C; Gentile F; Marra G; Misischi F; Molinaro L; Bergamasco L; Gontero P; Papotti M; Fonio P
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 May; 44(5):1883-1893. PubMed ID: 30788558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Standardized Reporting of Prostate MRI: Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and Version 2.
Tewes S; Mokov N; Hartung D; Schick V; Peters I; Schedl P; Pertschy S; Wacker F; Voshage G; Hueper K
PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162879. PubMed ID: 27657729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of PI-RADS v1 and v2 for multiparametric MRI detection of prostate cancer with whole-mount histological workup as reference standard.
Schaudinn A; Gawlitza J; Mucha S; Linder N; Franz T; Horn LC; Kahn T; Busse H
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():180-185. PubMed ID: 31153562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Synthetic magnetic resonance imaging for primary prostate cancer evaluation: Diagnostic potential of a non-contrast-enhanced bi-parametric approach enhanced with relaxometry measurements.
Arita Y; Akita H; Fujiwara H; Hashimoto M; Shigeta K; Kwee TC; Yoshida S; Kosaka T; Okuda S; Oya M; Jinzaki M
Eur J Radiol Open; 2022; 9():100403. PubMed ID: 35242886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prebiopsy Biparametric MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With PI-RADS Version 2: A Multicenter Study.
Choi MH; Kim CK; Lee YJ; Jung SE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Apr; 212(4):839-846. PubMed ID: 30779662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of multiparametric and biparametric MRI of the prostate: are gadolinium-based contrast agents needed for routine examinations?
Junker D; Steinkohl F; Fritz V; Bektic J; Tokas T; Aigner F; Herrmann TRW; Rieger M; Nagele U
World J Urol; 2019 Apr; 37(4):691-699. PubMed ID: 30078170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective comparison of a fast 1.5-T biparametric with the 3.0-T multiparametric ESUR magnetic resonance imaging protocol as a triage test for men at risk of prostate cancer.
Van Nieuwenhove S; Saussez TP; Thiry S; Trefois P; Annet L; Michoux N; Lecouvet F; Tombal B
BJU Int; 2019 Mar; 123(3):411-420. PubMed ID: 30240059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric vs multiparametric MRI in clinically significant prostate cancer: Comparison between readers with different experience.
Di Campli E; Delli Pizzi A; Seccia B; Cianci R; d'Annibale M; Colasante A; Cinalli S; Castellan P; Navarra R; Iantorno R; Gabrielli D; Buffone A; Caulo M; Basilico R
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():17-23. PubMed ID: 29571792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utility of Quantitative T2-Mapping Compared to Conventional and Advanced Diffusion Weighted Imaging Techniques for Multiparametric Prostate MRI in Men with Hip Prosthesis.
Sathiadoss P; Schieda N; Haroon M; Osman H; Alrasheed S; Flood TA; Melkus G
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Jan; 55(1):265-274. PubMed ID: 34223675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter-reader agreement of the ESUR score for prostate MRI using in-bore MRI-guided biopsies as the reference standard.
Schimmöller L; Quentin M; Arsov C; Lanzman RS; Hiester A; Rabenalt R; Antoch G; Albers P; Blondin D
Eur Radiol; 2013 Nov; 23(11):3185-90. PubMed ID: 23756958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Current Status of Biparametric MRI in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Literature Analysis.
Belue MJ; Yilmaz EC; Daryanani A; Turkbey B
Life (Basel); 2022 May; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 35743835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic value of integrated
Zeng Y; Leng X; Liao H; Jiang G; Chen P
Prostate Int; 2022 Jun; 10(2):108-116. PubMed ID: 35510079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigating the role of DCE-MRI, over T2 and DWI, in accurate PI-RADS v2 assessment of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate lesions as defined at radical prostatectomy.
Taghipour M; Ziaei A; Alessandrino F; Hassanzadeh E; Harisinghani M; Vangel M; Tempany CM; Fennessy FM
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Apr; 44(4):1520-1527. PubMed ID: 30361870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Preliminary applicability evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 diagnostic score in 3.0T multi-parameters magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate specific antigen density for prostate cancer].
Zuo MZ; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Zhang CY; Wen R; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Wu JF; Li X; Shen JK
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 97(47):3693-3698. PubMed ID: 29325321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Visibility of significant prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-do we still need contrast media?
Huebner NA; Korn S; Resch I; Grubmüller B; Gross T; Gale R; Kramer G; Poetsch N; Clauser P; Haitel A; Fajkovic H; Shariat SF; Baltzer PA
Eur Radiol; 2021 Jun; 31(6):3754-3764. PubMed ID: 33263793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.
Kasel-Seibert M; Lehmann T; Aschenbach R; Guettler FV; Abubrig M; Grimm MO; Teichgraeber U; Franiel T
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):726-31. PubMed ID: 26971415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Head-to-head comparison of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v1.
Polanec S; Helbich TH; Bickel H; Pinker-Domenig K; Georg D; Shariat SF; Aulitzky W; Susani M; Baltzer PA
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27161062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
