These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3219248)

  • 1. Reducing the variability in durability of heart valve bioprostheses. Key factor for future improvement.
    Gabbay S; Welch H
    ASAIO Trans; 1988; 34(4):1022-6. PubMed ID: 3219248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ionescu-Shiley bovine pericardial bioprostheses. Histologic and ultrastructural studies.
    Hilbert SL; Ferrans VJ; McAllister HA; Cooley DA
    Am J Pathol; 1992 May; 140(5):1195-204. PubMed ID: 1580331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of tensile properties of xenopericardium from three animal species and finite element analysis for bioprosthetic heart valve tissue.
    Rassoli A; Fatouraee N; Guidoin R; Zhang Z
    Artif Organs; 2020 Mar; 44(3):278-287. PubMed ID: 31386771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anisotropic elasticity and strength of glutaraldehyde fixed bovine pericardium for use in pericardial bioprosthetic valves.
    Zioupos P; Barbenel JC; Fisher J
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Jan; 28(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 8126028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structure of bovine parietal pericardium and of unimplanted Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valvular bioprostheses.
    Ishihara T; Ferrans VJ; Jones M; Boyce SW; Roberts WC
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981 May; 81(5):747-57. PubMed ID: 7218840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Holographic interferometry and in vitro calcification: comparing pericardial versus porcine bioprostheses.
    Deiwick M; Glasmacher B; Tjan DT; Reul H; von Bally G; Scheld HH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Jul; 7(4):419-27. PubMed ID: 9697065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
    Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Role of mechanical stress in calcification of aortic bioprosthetic valves.
    Thubrikar MJ; Deck JD; Aouad J; Nolan SP
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Jul; 86(1):115-25. PubMed ID: 6865456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro calcification of pericardial bioprostheses.
    Glasmacher B; Reul H; Schneppershoff S; Schreck S; Rau G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Jul; 7(4):415-8. PubMed ID: 9697064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of collagen fiber orientation on the flexural properties of pericardial heterograft biomaterials.
    Mirnajafi A; Raymer J; Scott MJ; Sacks MS
    Biomaterials; 2005 Mar; 26(7):795-804. PubMed ID: 15350785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pericardial heterografts: why do these valves fail?
    Trowbridge EA; Lawford PV; Crofts CE; Roberts KM
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Apr; 95(4):577-85. PubMed ID: 3352291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Porcine aortic versus bovine pericardial valves: a comparative study of unimplanted and from patient explanted bioprostheses.
    Goffin YA; Bartik MA
    Life Support Syst; 1987; 5(2):127-43. PubMed ID: 3669720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unusual 25-year durability of an Ionescu-Shiley pericardial bioprosthesis.
    Fiore A; Cooley DA; Grande AM; Viganò M; Angelini P
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2011 Apr; 91(4):e52-3. PubMed ID: 21440107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Donkey pericardium compares favorably with commercial xenopericardia used in the manufacture of transcatheter heart valves.
    Mao J; Rassoli A; Tong Y; Rouse EN; Le-Bel G; How D; Germain L; Fatouraee N; Zhang Z; Reed RR; Guidoin R
    Artif Organs; 2019 Oct; 43(10):976-987. PubMed ID: 31140630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The role of pannus in the longevity of an Ionescu-Shiley pericardial bioprosthesis.
    Butany JW; Kesarwani R; Yau TM; Singh G; Thangaroopan M; Nair V; Leong SW
    J Card Surg; 2006; 21(5):505-7. PubMed ID: 16948773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro fluid dynamic characteristics of Ionescu-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards tissue bioprostheses.
    Yoganathan AP; Woo YR; Williams FP; Stevenson DM; Franch RH; Harrison EC
    Artif Organs; 1983 Nov; 7(4):459-69. PubMed ID: 6651586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The functional expectations of valve bioprostheses. I. Physical and histopathological tests for the use of sections of bovine pericardium].
    Braile DM; Soares MJ; Souza DR; Ramires VA; Suzigan S; Lourenço MF
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 1992 Sep; 59(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 1341167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Twenty-six-year durability of an Ionescu-Shiley standard profile pericardial aortic valve.
    Honda K; Okamura Y; Nishimura Y; Uchita S
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Feb; 10(2):315-6. PubMed ID: 19914926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is cutting stress responsible for the limited durability of heart valve bioprostheses?
    García Paez JM; Carrera San Martín A; García Sestafe JV; Millán I; Jorge E; Candela I; Castillo-Olivares JL
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 Oct; 100(4):580-6. PubMed ID: 2214834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of elasticities of components of a cardiac bioprosthesis leaflet.
    Páez JM; San Martin AC; Sestafe JV; Jorge-Herrero E; Navidad R; Cordón A; Candela I; Castillo-Olivares JL
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1996 Jan; 30(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 8788105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.