These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32193567)

  • 1. Alternatives to statistical decision trees in regulatory (eco-)toxicological bioassays.
    Kluxen FM; Hothorn LA
    Arch Toxicol; 2020 Apr; 94(4):1135-1149. PubMed ID: 32193567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expanding the toxicologist's statistical toolbox: Using effect size estimation and dose-response modelling for holistic assessments instead of generic testing.
    Kluxen FM; Jensen SM
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Apr; 121():104871. PubMed ID: 33485925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toxicity bioassays for ecological risk assessment in arid and semiarid ecosystems.
    Markwiese JT; Ryti RT; Hooten MM; Michael DI; Hlohowskyj I
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2001; 168():43-98. PubMed ID: 12882227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical approaches to the design of toxicology studies.
    Gad SC
    Curr Protoc Toxicol; 2001; Chapter 1():Unit1.2. PubMed ID: 23045020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Integrated Experimental Design for the Assessment of Multiple Toxicological End Points in Rat Bioassays.
    Manservisi F; Marquillas CB; Buscaroli A; Huff J; Lauriola M; Mandrioli D; Manservigi M; Panzacchi S; Silbergeld EK; Belpoggi F
    Environ Health Perspect; 2017 Mar; 125(3):289-295. PubMed ID: 27448388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A critical appraisal of the process of regulatory implementation of novel in vivo and in vitro methods for chemical hazard and risk assessment.
    Piersma AH; Ezendam J; Luijten M; Muller JJ; Rorije E; van der Ven LT; van Benthem J
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2014 Nov; 44(10):876-94. PubMed ID: 25058877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microbial bioassays in environmental toxicity testing.
    Viegas CA
    Adv Appl Microbiol; 2021; 115():115-158. PubMed ID: 34140132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Alternative test methods in inhalation toxicology: challenges and opportunities.
    Costa DL
    Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2008 Jun; 60(2-3):105-9. PubMed ID: 18486462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methods of statistical analysis of quantitative data obtained by toxicological bioassays using rodents in Japan: historical transition of the decision tree.
    Kobayashi K
    J Environ Biol; 2001 Jan; 22(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 11480343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multilaboratory evaluation of 15 bioassays for (eco)toxicity screening and hazard ranking of engineered nanomaterials: FP7 project NANOVALID.
    Bondarenko OM; Heinlaan M; Sihtmäe M; Ivask A; Kurvet I; Joonas E; Jemec A; Mannerström M; Heinonen T; Rekulapelly R; Singh S; Zou J; Pyykkö I; Drobne D; Kahru A
    Nanotoxicology; 2016 Nov; 10(9):1229-42. PubMed ID: 27259032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using historical control data in bioassays for regulatory toxicology.
    Kluxen FM; Weber K; Strupp C; Jensen SM; Hothorn LA; Garcin JC; Hofmann T
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Oct; 125():105024. PubMed ID: 34364928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sorption of silver nanoparticles to laboratory plastic during (eco)toxicological testing.
    Malysheva A; Ivask A; Hager C; Brunetti G; Marzouk ER; Lombi E; Voelcker NH
    Nanotoxicology; 2016; 10(4):385-90. PubMed ID: 26472210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of plant based bioassays for the toxicity testing of Indian waters.
    Siddiqui AH; Tabrez S; Ahmad M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2011 Aug; 179(1-4):241-53. PubMed ID: 21042847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implementation of the 3Rs (refinement, reduction, and replacement): validation and regulatory acceptance considerations for alternative toxicological test methods.
    Schechtman LM
    ILAR J; 2002; 43 Suppl():S85-94. PubMed ID: 12388858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Substance-tailored testing strategies in toxicology: an in silico methodology based on QSAR modeling of toxicological thresholds and Monte Carlo simulations of toxicological testing.
    Péry AR; Desmots S; Mombelli E
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Feb; 56(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 19766156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implementing Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century (TT21C): Making safety decisions using toxicity pathways, and progress in a prototype risk assessment.
    Adeleye Y; Andersen M; Clewell R; Davies M; Dent M; Edwards S; Fowler P; Malcomber S; Nicol B; Scott A; Scott S; Sun B; Westmoreland C; White A; Zhang Q; Carmichael PL
    Toxicology; 2015 Jun; 332():102-11. PubMed ID: 24582757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations.
    Dearfield KL; Gollapudi BB; Bemis JC; Benz RD; Douglas GR; Elespuru RK; Johnson GE; Kirkland DJ; LeBaron MJ; Li AP; Marchetti F; Pottenger LH; Rorije E; Tanir JY; Thybaud V; van Benthem J; Yauk CL; Zeiger E; Luijten M
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2017 Jun; 58(5):264-283. PubMed ID: 27650663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toxicity assessment strategies, data requirements, and risk assessment approaches to derive health based guidance values for non-relevant metabolites of plant protection products.
    Dekant W; Melching-Kollmuss S; Kalberlah F
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 56(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19883711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the safety of cosmetic chemicals: Consideration of a flux decision tree to predict dermally delivered systemic dose for comparison with oral TTC (Threshold of Toxicological Concern).
    Williams FM; Rothe H; Barrett G; Chiodini A; Whyte J; Cronin MT; Monteiro-Riviere NA; Plautz J; Roper C; Westerhout J; Yang C; Guy RH
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Apr; 76():174-86. PubMed ID: 26825378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regulatory forum opinion piece*: supporting the need for international harmonization of safety assessments for food flavoring substances.
    Konishi Y; Hayashi SM; Fukushima S
    Toxicol Pathol; 2014 Aug; 42(6):949-53. PubMed ID: 23881932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.