196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32193891)
1. Comparison of One- and Two-Region of Interest Strain Elastography Measurements in the Differential Diagnosis of Breast Masses.
Park HJ; Kim SM; Yun B; Jang M; Kim B; Lee SH; Ahn HS
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 21(4):431-441. PubMed ID: 32193891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Semi-Quantitative Strain Ratio Determined Using Different Measurement Methods: Comparison of Strain Ratio Values and Diagnostic Performance Using One- versus Two-Region-of-Interest Measurement.
Yoon JH; Song MK; Kim EK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 May; 43(5):911-917. PubMed ID: 28242085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the usefulness of breast strain elastography for intraductal lesions.
Kokubu Y; Yamada K; Tanabe M; Izumori A; Kato C; Horii R; Ohno S; Matsueda K
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2021 Jan; 48(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 33389371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast strain elastography: Observer variability in data acquisition and interpretation.
Dong Y; Zhou C; Zhou J; Yang Z; Zhang J; Zhan W
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():157-161. PubMed ID: 29571790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study.
Seo M; Ahn HS; Park SH; Lee JB; Choi BI; Sohn YM; Shin SY
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 28688156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography: how it affects the diagnosis of breast lesions.
Yoon JH; Kim MH; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Kwak JY; Kim MJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Mar; 196(3):730-6. PubMed ID: 21343520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Semi-Quantitative Strain Ratio in the Differential Diagnosis of Breast Masses: Measurements Using One Region-of-Interest.
Yoon JH; Song MK; Kim EK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1800-6. PubMed ID: 27166015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: a comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography.
Chung SY; Moon WK; Choi JW; Cho N; Jang M; Kim KG
Acta Radiol; 2010 Feb; 51(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 19929254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses.
Lee JH; Kim SH; Kang BJ; Choi JJ; Jeong SH; Yim HW; Song BJ
Acad Radiol; 2011 Jan; 18(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 21115376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of qualitative and semiquantitative strain elastography in breast lesions for diagnostic accuracy.
Mutala TM; Ndaiga P; Aywak A
Cancer Imaging; 2016 May; 16(1):12. PubMed ID: 27229478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance.
Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses in the same population.
Kim HJ; Kim SM; Kim B; La Yun B; Jang M; Ko Y; Lee SH; Jeong H; Chang JM; Cho N
Sci Rep; 2018 Apr; 8(1):6197. PubMed ID: 29670125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Ultrasound Elastography and Color Doppler Ultrasonography for Distinguishing Small Triple-Negative Breast Cancer From Fibroadenoma.
Yeo SH; Kim GR; Lee SH; Moon WK
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Sep; 37(9):2135-2146. PubMed ID: 29424448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the SR
Moon JH; Koh SH; Park SY; Hwang JY; Woo JY
Acta Radiol; 2019 Jan; 60(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 29726693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for the differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions, combined with B-mode ultrasonography: qualitative and quantitative assessments.
Youk JH; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim H; Park YJ; Kim JA
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 40(10):2336-44. PubMed ID: 25130444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of shear-wave elastography for breast masses using different region-of-interest (ROI) settings.
Youk JH; Son EJ; Han K; Gweon HM; Kim JA
Acta Radiol; 2018 Jul; 59(7):789-797. PubMed ID: 29058962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simultaneous comparison between strain and shear wave elastography of breast masses for the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions by qualitative and quantitative assessments.
Fujioka T; Mori M; Kubota K; Kikuchi Y; Katsuta L; Kasahara M; Oda G; Ishiba T; Nakagawa T; Tateishi U
Breast Cancer; 2019 Nov; 26(6):792-798. PubMed ID: 31175605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Feasibility of Classifying Breast Masses Using a Computer-Assisted Diagnosis (CAD) System Based on Ultrasound Elastography and BI-RADS Lexicon.
Fleury EFC; Gianini AC; Marcomini K; Oliveira V
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533033818763461. PubMed ID: 29551088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The value of elastography strain rate ratio in benign and malignant BI-RADS-US 3-4 breast masses.
Li X; Sun W; Zhang H
Biomol Biomed; 2024 May; 24(3):625-632. PubMed ID: 38149832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Chang JM; Won JK; Lee KB; Park IA; Yi A; Moon WK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W347-56. PubMed ID: 23883252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
