These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32195631)

  • 41. Combining AHP-Entropy Approach with GIS for Construction Waste Landfill Selection-A Case Study of Shenzhen.
    Ding Z; Zhu M; Wu Z; Fu Y; Liu X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Oct; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 30326615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Economic analysis of waste-to-energy industry in China.
    Zhao XG; Jiang GW; Li A; Wang L
    Waste Manag; 2016 Feb; 48():604-618. PubMed ID: 26514312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Landfill mining in Austria: foundations for an integrated ecological and economic assessment.
    Hermann R; Baumgartner RJ; Sarc R; Ragossnig A; Wolfsberger T; Eisenberger M; Budischowsky A; Pomberger R
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Sep; 32(9 Suppl):48-58. PubMed ID: 25012302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Remediation Technology and Typical Case Analysis of Informal Landfills in Rainy Areas of Southern China.
    Yin Q; Yan H; Guo X; Liang Y; Wang X; Yang Q; Li S; Zhang X; Zhou Y; Nian Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jan; 17(3):. PubMed ID: 32024022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Landfill aeration in the framework of a reclamation project in Northern Italy.
    Raga R; Cossu R
    Waste Manag; 2014 Mar; 34(3):683-91. PubMed ID: 24411985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Climate co-benefits of energy recovery from landfill gas in developing Asian cities: a case study in Bangkok.
    Menikpura SN; Sang-Arun J; Bengtsson M
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Oct; 31(10):1002-11. PubMed ID: 23797299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An environmental analysis for comparing waste management options and strategies.
    Marchettini N; Ridolfi R; Rustici M
    Waste Manag; 2007; 27(4):562-71. PubMed ID: 16765586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Potential SRF generation from a closed landfill in northern Italy.
    Passamani G; Ragazzi M; Torretta V
    Waste Manag; 2016 Jan; 47(Pt B):157-63. PubMed ID: 26209342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A case-study of landfill minimization and material recovery via waste co-gasification in a new waste management scheme.
    Tanigaki N; Ishida Y; Osada M
    Waste Manag; 2015 Mar; 37():137-46. PubMed ID: 25182227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Environmental impacts and costs of solid waste: a comparison of landfill and incineration.
    Rabl A; Spadaro JV; Zoughaib A
    Waste Manag Res; 2008 Apr; 26(2):147-62. PubMed ID: 18578154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Landfill siting based on optimisation, multiple decision analysis, and geographic information system analyses.
    Spigolon LM; Giannotti M; Larocca AP; Russo MA; Souza NDC
    Waste Manag Res; 2018 Jul; 36(7):606-615. PubMed ID: 29921168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of different end-of-life management alternatives for used natural cork stoppers through life cycle assessment.
    Demertzi M; Dias AC; Matos A; Arroja LM
    Waste Manag; 2015 Dec; 46():668-80. PubMed ID: 26427936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Technical potential of electricity production from municipal solid waste disposed in the biggest cities in Brazil: landfill gas, biogas and thermal treatment.
    de Souza SN; Horttanainen M; Antonelli J; Klaus O; Lindino CA; Nogueira CE
    Waste Manag Res; 2014 Oct; 32(10):1015-23. PubMed ID: 25323146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Sustainability assessment and prioritisation of bottom ash management in Macao.
    Sou WI; Chu A; Chiueh PT
    Waste Manag Res; 2016 Dec; 34(12):1275-1282. PubMed ID: 27637273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A novel approach in calculating site-specific aftercare completion criteria for landfills in The Netherlands: Policy developments.
    Brand E; de Nijs TC; Dijkstra JJ; Comans RN
    Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():255-61. PubMed ID: 27497586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assessment of environmental and economic feasibility of Enhanced Landfill Mining.
    Danthurebandara M; Van Passel S; Vanderreydt I; Van Acker K
    Waste Manag; 2015 Nov; 45():434-47. PubMed ID: 25708403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An assessment of bioreactor landfill costs and benefits.
    Berge ND; Reinhart DR; Batarseh ES
    Waste Manag; 2009 May; 29(5):1558-67. PubMed ID: 19167875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Waste incineration industry and development policies in China.
    Li Y; Zhao X; Li Y; Li X
    Waste Manag; 2015 Dec; 46():234-41. PubMed ID: 26303653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Fertilizer effects of composted materials from different sources on cultivating Impatiens balsamina L. in municipal solid waste management.
    Chen Y; Zhou C; Xu W
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Feb; 25(6):5771-5778. PubMed ID: 29230654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Impact assessment of waste management options in Singapore.
    Tan RB; Khoo HH
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 Mar; 56(3):244-54. PubMed ID: 16573187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.