431 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32196356)
1. CORP: Assessing author compliance with data presentation guidelines for manuscript figures.
Keehan KH; Gaffney MC; Zucker IH
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2020 May; 318(5):H1051-H1058. PubMed ID: 32196356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer-review and editorial process of the Ethiopian Medical Journal: ten years assessment of the status of submitted manuscripts.
Enquselassie F
Ethiop Med J; 2013 Apr; 51(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24079153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Author perception of peer review.
Gibson M; Spong CY; Simonsen SE; Martin S; Scott JR
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 112(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 18757664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial.
Cobo E; Selva-O'Callagham A; Ribera JM; Cardellach F; Dominguez R; Vilardell M
PLoS One; 2007 Mar; 2(3):e332. PubMed ID: 17389922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?
Morton JP
Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19261753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Statistical considerations in reporting cardiovascular research.
Lindsey ML; Gray GA; Wood SK; Curran-Everett D
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2018 Aug; 315(2):H303-H313. PubMed ID: 30028200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Editorial peer reviewers' recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?
Kravitz RL; Franks P; Feldman MD; Gerrity M; Byrne C; Tierney WM
PLoS One; 2010 Apr; 5(4):e10072. PubMed ID: 20386704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models.
Kowalczuk MK; Dudbridge F; Nanda S; Harriman SL; Patel J; Moylan EC
BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e008707. PubMed ID: 26423855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact and perceived value of journal reporting guidelines among Radiology authors and reviewers.
Dewey M; Levine D; Bossuyt PM; Kressel HY
Eur Radiol; 2019 Aug; 29(8):3986-3995. PubMed ID: 30694365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conflict of Interest Disclosure Policies and Practices in Peer-reviewed Biomedical Journals.
Cooper RJ; Gupta M; Wilkes MS; Hoffman JR
J Gen Intern Med; 2006 Dec; 21(12):1248-52. PubMed ID: 17105524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does masking author identity improve peer review quality? A randomized controlled trial. PEER Investigators.
Justice AC; Cho MK; Winker MA; Berlin JA; Rennie D
JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 9676668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. JACLP Guide for Manuscript Peer Review: How to Perform a Peer Review and How to Be Responsive to Reviewer Comments.
Oldham MA; Kontos N; Baller E; Cerimele JM
J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry; 2023; 64(5):468-472. PubMed ID: 36796760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reported use of reporting guidelines among
Botos J
Res Integr Peer Rev; 2018; 3():7. PubMed ID: 30275983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Write a scientific paper (WASP): Editor's perspective of submissions and dealing with editors.
Cuschieri S; Vassallo J
Early Hum Dev; 2019 Feb; 129():93-95. PubMed ID: 30578111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of reviewers selected by editors and reviewers suggested by authors.
Rivara FP; Cummings P; Ringold S; Bergman AB; Joffe A; Christakis DA
J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 17643779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The recognition of peer reviewers activity: the potential promotion of a virtuous circle.].
Pierno A; Fruscio R; Bellani G
Recenti Prog Med; 2017 Sep; 108(9):355-359. PubMed ID: 28901342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethical issues in studying submissions to a medical journal.
Olson CM; Glass RM; Thacker SB; Stroup DF
JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(3):290-1. PubMed ID: 9676686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals.
Hirst A; Altman DG
PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e35621. PubMed ID: 22558178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomedical journal speed and efficiency: a cross-sectional pilot survey of author experiences.
Wallach JD; Egilman AC; Gopal AD; Swami N; Krumholz HM; Ross JS
Res Integr Peer Rev; 2018; 3():1. PubMed ID: 29451557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
