489 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32196459)
1. Patient Uptake, Experience, and Satisfaction Using Web-Based and Face-to-Face Hearing Health Services: Process Evaluation Study.
Ratanjee-Vanmali H; Swanepoel W; Laplante-Lévesque A
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Mar; 22(3):e15875. PubMed ID: 32196459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characteristics, behaviours and readiness of persons seeking hearing healthcare online.
Ratanjee-Vanmali H; Swanepoel W; Laplante-Lévesque A
Int J Audiol; 2019 Feb; 58(2):107-115. PubMed ID: 30289050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital Proficiency Is Not a Significant Barrier for Taking Up Hearing Services With a Hybrid Online and Face-to-Face Model.
Ratanjee-Vanmali H; Swanepoel W; Laplante-Lévesque A
Am J Audiol; 2020 Dec; 29(4):785-808. PubMed ID: 32997504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Person-centred cochlear implant care: Assessing the need for clinic intervention in adults with cochlear implants using a dual approach of an online speech recognition test and a questionnaire.
Cullington HE; Agyemang-Prempeh A
Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Mar; 18(2):76-88. PubMed ID: 28151091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. eHealth and the hearing aid adult patient journey: a state-of-the-art review.
Paglialonga A; Cleveland Nielsen A; Ingo E; Barr C; Laplante-Lévesque A
Biomed Eng Online; 2018 Jul; 17(1):101. PubMed ID: 30064497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
Newell S; Jordan Z
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility and Assessment of a Hybrid Audiology Service Delivery Model for Older Adult Hearing Aid Users: A Pilot Study.
Arnold ML; Schwartz B; Neil H; Chisolm TH; Sanchez VA
Am J Audiol; 2022 Sep; 31(3S):892-904. PubMed ID: 35503960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of telehealth services to facilitate audiological management for children: A scoping review and content analysis.
Govender SM; Mars M
J Telemed Telecare; 2017 Apr; 23(3):392-401. PubMed ID: 27130158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Telehealth-enabled auditory brainstem response testing for infants living in rural communities: the British Columbia Early Hearing Program experience.
Hatton JL; Rowlandson J; Beers A; Small S
Int J Audiol; 2019 Jul; 58(7):381-392. PubMed ID: 30987477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stages of change in adults who have failed an online hearing screening.
Laplante-Lévesque A; Brännström KJ; Ingo E; Andersson G; Lunner T
Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 25158981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models.
Davis A; Smith P; Ferguson M; Stephens D; Gianopoulos I
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Oct; 11(42):1-294. PubMed ID: 17927921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experiences With Hearing Health Care Services: What Can We Learn From Online Consumer Reviews?
Manchaiah V; Bennett RJ; Ratinaud P; Swanepoel W
Am J Audiol; 2021 Sep; 30(3):745-754. PubMed ID: 34491785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using web services to realize remote hearing assessment.
Yao J; Wan Y; Givens GD
J Clin Monit Comput; 2010 Feb; 24(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 19904618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How should hearing screening tests be offered?
Koopman J; Davey E; Thomas N; Wittkop T; Verschuure H
Int J Audiol; 2008 May; 47(5):230-7. PubMed ID: 18465407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maternal knowledge and attitudes to universal newborn hearing screening: Reviewing an established program.
Lam MYY; Wong ECM; Law CW; Lee HHL; McPherson B
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 105():146-153. PubMed ID: 29447803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Web portals in primary care: an evaluation of patient readiness and willingness to pay for online services.
Adler KG
J Med Internet Res; 2006 Oct; 8(4):e26. PubMed ID: 17213045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The potential of Web-based interventions for heart disease self-management: a mixed methods investigation.
Kerr C; Murray E; Noble L; Morris R; Bottomley C; Stevenson F; Patterson D; Peacock R; Turner I; Jackson K; Nazareth I
J Med Internet Res; 2010 Dec; 12(4):e56. PubMed ID: 21156471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Meeting the needs of parents around the time of diagnosis of disability among their children: evaluation of a novel program for information, support, and liaison by key workers.
Rahi JS; Manaras I; Tuomainen H; Hundt GL
Pediatrics; 2004 Oct; 114(4):e477-82. PubMed ID: 15466074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient experiences and attitudes about access to a patient electronic health care record and linked web messaging.
Hassol A; Walker JM; Kidder D; Rokita K; Young D; Pierdon S; Deitz D; Kuck S; Ortiz E
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2004; 11(6):505-13. PubMed ID: 15299001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
