171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32196468)
1. Coupling of cell fate selection model enhances DNA damage response and may underlie BE phenomenon.
Demirkıran G; Kalaycı Demir G; Güzeliş C
IET Syst Biol; 2020 Apr; 14(2):96-106. PubMed ID: 32196468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring the Influence of Parameters on the p53 Response When Single-Stranded Breaks and Double-Stranded Breaks Coexist.
Ma A; Dai X
Interdiscip Sci; 2019 Dec; 11(4):679-690. PubMed ID: 31222582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deficiencies of double-strand break repair factors and effects on mutagenesis in directly gamma-irradiated and medium-mediated bystander human lymphoblastoid cells.
Zhang Y; Zhou J; Held KD; Redmond RW; Prise KM; Liber HL
Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 18220473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stochasticity of intranuclear biochemical reaction processes controls the final decision of cell fate associated with DNA damage.
Iwamoto K; Hamada H; Eguchi Y; Okamoto M
PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e101333. PubMed ID: 25003668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel mathematical model of ATM/p53/NF- κB pathways points to the importance of the DDR switch-off mechanisms.
Jonak K; Kurpas M; Szoltysek K; Janus P; Abramowicz A; Puszynski K
BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10(1):75. PubMed ID: 27526774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ku70/80 modulates ATM and ATR signaling pathways in response to DNA double strand breaks.
Tomimatsu N; Tahimic CG; Otsuki A; Burma S; Fukuhara A; Sato K; Shiota G; Oshimura M; Chen DJ; Kurimasa A
J Biol Chem; 2007 Apr; 282(14):10138-45. PubMed ID: 17272272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling of DNA Damage Repair and Cell Response in Relation to p53 System Exposed to Ionizing Radiation.
Hu A; Zhou W; Wu Z; Zhang H; Li J; Qiu R
Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Sep; 23(19):. PubMed ID: 36232625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cell fate decision mediated by p53 pulses.
Zhang XP; Liu F; Cheng Z; Wang W
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Jul; 106(30):12245-50. PubMed ID: 19617533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A plausible model for the digital response of p53 to DNA damage.
Ma L; Wagner J; Rice JJ; Hu W; Levine AJ; Stolovitzky GA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2005 Oct; 102(40):14266-71. PubMed ID: 16186499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence of an adaptive response targeting DNA nonhomologous end joining and its transmission to bystander cells.
Klammer H; Kadhim M; Iliakis G
Cancer Res; 2010 Nov; 70(21):8498-506. PubMed ID: 20861183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A mathematical model for the detection mechanism of DNA double-strand breaks depending on autophosphorylation of ATM.
Mouri K; Nacher JC; Akutsu T
PLoS One; 2009; 4(4):e5131. PubMed ID: 19365581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of heterochromatin on DNA double strand break repair: Getting the strong, silent type to relax.
Goodarzi AA; Jeggo P; Lobrich M
DNA Repair (Amst); 2010 Dec; 9(12):1273-82. PubMed ID: 21036673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chromium (VI) activates ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) protein. Requirement of ATM for both apoptosis and recovery from terminal growth arrest.
Ha L; Ceryak S; Patierno SR
J Biol Chem; 2003 May; 278(20):17885-94. PubMed ID: 12637545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between DNA double-strand break rejoining and cell survival after exposure to ionizing radiation in human fibroblast strains with differing ATM/p53 status: implications for evaluation of clinical radiosensitivity.
Mirzayans R; Severin D; Murray D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Dec; 66(5):1498-505. PubMed ID: 17126209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. AKT2 suppresses pro-survival autophagy triggered by DNA double-strand breaks in colorectal cancer cells.
Seiwert N; Neitzel C; Stroh S; Frisan T; Audebert M; Toulany M; Kaina B; Fahrer J
Cell Death Dis; 2017 Aug; 8(8):e3019. PubMed ID: 28837154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mathematical modelling of p53 basal dynamics and DNA damage response.
Chong KH; Samarasinghe S; Kulasiri D
Math Biosci; 2015 Jan; 259():27-42. PubMed ID: 25433195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MicroRNA-16 feedback loop with p53 and Wip1 can regulate cell fate determination between apoptosis and senescence in DNA damage response.
Issler MVC; Mombach JCM
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185794. PubMed ID: 28968438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The p53 protein and its molecular network: modelling a missing link between DNA damage and cell fate.
Eliaš J; Dimitrio L; Clairambault J; Natalini R
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2014 Jan; 1844(1 Pt B):232-47. PubMed ID: 24113167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Functional interaction of H2AX, NBS1, and p53 in ATM-dependent DNA damage responses and tumor suppression.
Kang J; Ferguson D; Song H; Bassing C; Eckersdorff M; Alt FW; Xu Y
Mol Cell Biol; 2005 Jan; 25(2):661-70. PubMed ID: 15632067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. p53 isoform Δ113p53/Δ133p53 promotes DNA double-strand break repair to protect cell from death and senescence in response to DNA damage.
Gong L; Gong H; Pan X; Chang C; Ou Z; Ye S; Yin L; Yang L; Tao T; Zhang Z; Liu C; Lane DP; Peng J; Chen J
Cell Res; 2015 Mar; 25(3):351-69. PubMed ID: 25698579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
