163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32196566)
21. Computed tomography for managing periprosthetic femoral fractures. A retrospective analysis.
Rupp M; Kern S; Ismat A; El Khassawna T; Knapp G; Szalay G; Heiss C; Biehl C
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 May; 20(1):258. PubMed ID: 31138187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparisons of preoperative three-dimensional planning and surgical reconstruction in primary cementless total hip arthroplasty.
Hassani H; Cherix S; Ek ET; Rüdiger HA
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1273-7. PubMed ID: 24502952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Digital Planning Software Fails to Reflect Stem Torsion on Plain Radiographs after Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Worlicek M; Weber M; Zeman F; Wörner M; Schneider M; Grifka J; Renkawitz T; Craiovan B
Rofo; 2016 Aug; 188(8):763-7. PubMed ID: 27355814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radiographic Outcomes of Preoperative CT Scan-Derived Patient-Specific Total Ankle Arthroplasty.
Hsu AR; Davis WH; Cohen BE; Jones CP; Ellington JK; Anderson RB
Foot Ankle Int; 2015 Oct; 36(10):1163-9. PubMed ID: 25941196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Digital templating facilitates accurate leg length correction in total hip arthroplasty.
Jassim SS; Ingham C; Keeling M; Wimhurst JA
Acta Orthop Belg; 2012 Jun; 78(3):344-9. PubMed ID: 22822575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Preoperative planning for implant placement with consideration of pelvic tilt in total hip arthroplasty: postoperative efficacy evaluation.
Inaba Y; Kobayashi N; Suzuki H; Ike H; Kubota S; Saito T
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Jul; 17():280. PubMed ID: 27412447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Digital templating in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty.
Levine B; Fabi D; Deirmengian C
Orthopedics; 2010 Nov; 33(11):797. PubMed ID: 21053892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The correlation between clinical radiological outcome and contact state of implant and femur using three-dimensional templating software in cementless total hip arthroplasty.
Inoue D; Kabata T; Maeda T; Kajino Y; Yamamoto T; Takagi T; Ohmori T; Tsuchiya H
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Aug; 26(6):591-8. PubMed ID: 27334622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Is computerised 3D templating more accurate than 2D templating to predict size of components in primary total hip arthroplasty?
Schiffner E; Latz D; Jungbluth P; Grassmann JP; Tanner S; Karbowski A; Windolf J; Schneppendahl J
Hip Int; 2019 May; 29(3):270-275. PubMed ID: 29781288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intraoperative placement of total hip arthroplasty components with robotic-arm assisted technology correlates with postoperative implant position: a CT-based study.
Nodzo SR; Chang CC; Carroll KM; Barlow BT; Banks SA; Padgett DE; Mayman DJ; Jerabek SA
Bone Joint J; 2018 Oct; 100-B(10):1303-1309. PubMed ID: 30295538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Acetate templating on calibrated standing digital radiograph improves accuracy of preoperative templating for total hip arthroplasty.
Wang Q; Xiao J; Zhu L; Zhao X; Liu Z; Wang J; Qin Y
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 May; 103(3):341-347. PubMed ID: 28263807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Preoperative planning interest of a total hip prosthesis].
Thirion T; Georis P; Gillet P
Rev Med Liege; 2019 Nov; 74(11):593-597. PubMed ID: 31729848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Templating for Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Modern Age.
Vigdorchik JM; Sharma AK; Jerabek SA; Mayman DJ; Sculco PK
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2021 Mar; 29(5):e208-e216. PubMed ID: 33543909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of Preoperative Templating in Total Hip Arthroplasty With Special Focus on Stem Morphology: A Randomized Comparison Between Common Digital and Three-Dimensional Planning Using Biplanar Radiographs.
Brenneis M; Braun S; van Drongelen S; Fey B; Tarhan T; Stief F; Meurer A
J Arthroplasty; 2021 Mar; 36(3):1149-1155. PubMed ID: 33160804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Can a Conical Implant Successfully Address Complex Anatomy in Primary THA? Radiographs and Hip Scores at Early Followup.
Zhang Q; Goodman SB; Maloney WJ; Huddleston JI
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):459-64. PubMed ID: 26245165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantification of Imaging Error in the Measurement of Cup Position: A Cadaveric Comparison of Radiographic and Computed Tomography Imaging.
Schwarzkopf R; Vigdorchik JM; Miller TT; Bogner EA; Muir JM; Cross MB
Orthopedics; 2017 Nov; 40(6):e952-e958. PubMed ID: 28934535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Use of Patient Specific Instruments at Total Knee Arthroplasty. One-Year Results of a Prospective Randomised Study].
Musil D; Stehlík J; Abrman K; Held M; Sadovský P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2016; 83(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 27484075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The validity and reproducibility of cross table radiographs compared with CT scans for the measurement of anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty.
Pankaj A; Mittal A; Chawla A
Bone Joint J; 2017 Aug; 99-B(8):1006-1011. PubMed ID: 28768776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Misinterpretation of cup anteversion in total hip arthroplasty using planar radiography.
Marx A; von Knoch M; Pförtner J; Wiese M; Saxler G
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Sep; 126(7):487-92. PubMed ID: 16810554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of analog 2D and digital 3D preoperative templating for predicting implant size in total knee arthroplasty.
Kobayashi A; Ishii Y; Takeda M; Noguchi H; Higuchi H; Toyabe S
Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 22309295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
