212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32197580)
1. Standard machine learning approaches outperform deep representation learning on phenotype prediction from transcriptomics data.
Smith AM; Walsh JR; Long J; Davis CB; Henstock P; Hodge MR; Maciejewski M; Mu XJ; Ra S; Zhao S; Ziemek D; Fisher CK
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 21(1):119. PubMed ID: 32197580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomic prediction using machine learning: a comparison of the performance of regularized regression, ensemble, instance-based and deep learning methods on synthetic and empirical data.
Lourenço VM; Ogutu JO; Rodrigues RAP; Posekany A; Piepho HP
BMC Genomics; 2024 Feb; 25(1):152. PubMed ID: 38326768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Weakly Semi-supervised phenotyping using Electronic Health records.
Nogues IE; Wen J; Lin Y; Liu M; Tedeschi SK; Geva A; Cai T; Hong C
J Biomed Inform; 2022 Oct; 134():104175. PubMed ID: 36064111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Batch normalization followed by merging is powerful for phenotype prediction integrating multiple heterogeneous studies.
Gao Y; Sun F
PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 Oct; 19(10):e1010608. PubMed ID: 37844077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biological classification with RNA-seq data: Can alternatively spliced transcript expression enhance machine learning classifiers?
Johnson NT; Dhroso A; Hughes KJ; Korkin D
RNA; 2018 Sep; 24(9):1119-1132. PubMed ID: 29941426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robust identification of molecular phenotypes using semi-supervised learning.
Roder H; Oliveira C; Net L; Linstid B; Tsypin M; Roder J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 May; 20(1):273. PubMed ID: 31138112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A semi-supervised deep learning method based on stacked sparse auto-encoder for cancer prediction using RNA-seq data.
Xiao Y; Wu J; Lin Z; Zhao X
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Nov; 166():99-105. PubMed ID: 30415723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deep learning of 2D-Restructured gene expression representations for improved low-sample therapeutic response prediction.
Cheng KP; Shen WX; Jiang YY; Chen Y; Chen YZ; Tan Y
Comput Biol Med; 2023 Sep; 164():107245. PubMed ID: 37480677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of deep learning and transfer learning for cancer prediction based on gene expression data.
Hanczar B; Bourgeais V; Zehraoui F
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Jul; 23(1):262. PubMed ID: 35786378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Machine Learning Analysis of RNA-seq Data for Diagnostic and Prognostic Prediction of Colon Cancer.
Bostanci E; Kocak E; Unal M; Guzel MS; Acici K; Asuroglu T
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 36991790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How does normalization impact RNA-seq disease diagnosis?
Han H; Men K
J Biomed Inform; 2018 Sep; 85():80-92. PubMed ID: 30041017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combining structured and unstructured data for predictive models: a deep learning approach.
Zhang D; Yin C; Zeng J; Yuan X; Zhang P
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Oct; 20(1):280. PubMed ID: 33121479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic evaluation of supervised machine learning for sample origin prediction using metagenomic sequencing data.
Chen JC; Tyler AD
Biol Direct; 2020 Dec; 15(1):29. PubMed ID: 33302990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Machine learning models outperform deep learning models, provide interpretation and facilitate feature selection for soybean trait prediction.
Gill M; Anderson R; Hu H; Bennamoun M; Petereit J; Valliyodan B; Nguyen HT; Batley J; Bayer PE; Edwards D
BMC Plant Biol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):180. PubMed ID: 35395721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhancing the prediction of IDC breast cancer staging from gene expression profiles using hybrid feature selection methods and deep learning architecture.
Kishore A; Venkataramana L; Prasad DVV; Mohan A; Jha B
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2023 Nov; 61(11):2895-2919. PubMed ID: 37530887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benchmarking weakly-supervised deep learning pipelines for whole slide classification in computational pathology.
Ghaffari Laleh N; Muti HS; Loeffler CML; Echle A; Saldanha OL; Mahmood F; Lu MY; Trautwein C; Langer R; Dislich B; Buelow RD; Grabsch HI; Brenner H; Chang-Claude J; Alwers E; Brinker TJ; Khader F; Truhn D; Gaisa NT; Boor P; Hoffmeister M; Schulz V; Kather JN
Med Image Anal; 2022 Jul; 79():102474. PubMed ID: 35588568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the performance of machine learning methods and variable selection methods for predicting difficult-to-measure traits in Holstein dairy cattle using milk infrared spectral data.
Mota LFM; Pegolo S; Baba T; Peñagaricano F; Morota G; Bittante G; Cecchinato A
J Dairy Sci; 2021 Jul; 104(7):8107-8121. PubMed ID: 33865589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benchmarking of analytical combinations for COVID-19 outcome prediction using single-cell RNA sequencing data.
Cao Y; Ghazanfar S; Yang P; Yang J
Brief Bioinform; 2023 May; 24(3):. PubMed ID: 37096588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deep learning prediction of chemical-induced dose-dependent and context-specific multiplex phenotype responses and its application to personalized alzheimer's disease drug repurposing.
Wu Y; Liu Q; Qiu Y; Xie L
PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Aug; 18(8):e1010367. PubMed ID: 35951653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Exploring combinations of dimensionality reduction, transfer learning, and regularization methods for predicting binary phenotypes with transcriptomic data.
Oshternian SR; Loipfinger S; Bhattacharya A; Fehrmann RSN
BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 Apr; 25(1):167. PubMed ID: 38671342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
