175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32197993)
1. Comparison of Virtual Ultrasonographic Hysteroscopy with Conventional Hysteroscopy in the Workup of Patients Who Are Infertile.
Stepniewska AK; Verrazzo P; Savelli L; Trivella G; Signori C; Clarizia R; Guerriero M; Mollo A; De Placido G; Ceccaroni M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 32197993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of 3D-transvaginal ultrasound in detecting uterine cavity abnormalities in infertile patients as compared with hysteroscopy.
Apirakviriya C; Rungruxsirivorn T; Phupong V; Wisawasukmongchol W
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 May; 200():24-8. PubMed ID: 26967342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Rare Uterine Malformation: Asymmetric Septate Uterus.
Biler A; Akdemir A; Peker N; Sendag F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):28-29. PubMed ID: 28647574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional saline infusion sonography compared to two-dimensional saline infusion sonography for the diagnosis of focal intracavitary lesions.
Nieuwenhuis LL; Hermans FJ; Bij de Vaate AJM; Leeflang MM; Brölmann HA; Hehenkamp WJ; Mol BWJ; Clark TJ; Huirne JA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 May; 5(5):CD011126. PubMed ID: 28472862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of Tubal Patency Assessment in Diagnostic Hysteroscopy Compared with Laparoscopy in Infertile Women: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Promberger R; Simek IM; Nouri K; Obermaier K; Kurz C; Ott J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):794-799. PubMed ID: 29221993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical value of real time 3D sonohysterography and 2D sonohysterography in comparison to hysteroscopy with subsequent histopathological examination in perimenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding.
Kowalczyk D; Guzikowski W; Więcek J; Sioma-Markowska U
Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2012; 33(2):212-6. PubMed ID: 22592204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Routine office hysteroscopy in the investigation of infertile couples before assisted reproduction.
de Sá Rosa e de Silva AC; Rosa e Silva JC; Cândido dos Reis FJ; Nogueira AA; Ferriani RA
J Reprod Med; 2005 Jul; 50(7):501-6. PubMed ID: 16130847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Sonohysterosalpingography versus hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of uterine and tubal infertility].
Socolov D; Lupaşcu IA; Danciu E; Doroftei B; Boian I; Boiculese L; Pintilie P; Miron N
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2009; 113(3):803-8. PubMed ID: 20191836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective Study of Concordance Between Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography and Hysteroscopy for Evaluation of the Uterine Cavity in Patients Undergoing Infertility Studies.
Calles-Sastre L; Engels-Calvo V; Ríos-Vallejo M; Serrano-González L; García-Espantaleón M; Royuela A; De la Cuesta R; Pérez-Medina T
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jun; 37(6):1431-1437. PubMed ID: 29143353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Hysterosalpingography and Combined Laparohysteroscopy for the Evaluation of Primary Infertility.
Nigam A; Saxena P; Mishra A
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2015; 13(52):281-5. PubMed ID: 27423275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Exploration of infertility: correlation hysterography hysteroscopy].
Mechhal M; Ben Aoun J; Hcini N; Gharsa A; Oueslati S; Binous N; Chaabene M
Tunis Med; 2012 Jun; 90(6):452-7. PubMed ID: 22693085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative Study of Hysteroscopy and 3D Ultrasound for Diagnosing Uterine Cavity Abnormalities.
Grigore M; Pristavu A; Iordache F; Gafitanu D; Ursulescu C
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2016; 120(4):866-73. PubMed ID: 30141843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of ultrasonography and hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of intrauterine lesions in infertile women.
Fabres C; Alam V; Balmaceda J; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mackenna A; Fernandez E
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1998 Nov; 5(4):375-8. PubMed ID: 9782141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Infertility in women: combined sonohysterography and hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of the uterine cavity.
De Felice C; Porfiri LM; Savelli S; Alfano G; Pace S; Manganaro L; Vestri AR; Drudi FM
Ultraschall Med; 2009 Feb; 30(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 19197821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of saline infusion sonography in the evaluation of uterine cavity abnormalities prior to assisted reproductive techniques: a systematic review and meta-analyses.
Seshadri S; El-Toukhy T; Douiri A; Jayaprakasan K; Khalaf Y
Hum Reprod Update; 2015; 21(2):262-74. PubMed ID: 25505226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of hydrosonography and diagnostic hysteroscopy in the evaluation of infertile patients.
Yucebilgin MS; Aktan E; Bozkurt K; Kazandi M; Akercan F; Mgoyi L; Terek MC
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2004; 31(1):56-8. PubMed ID: 14998191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of intracavitary lesions in 820 infertile women: comparison of outpatient hysteroscopy with histopathological examination.
Radwan P; Radwan M; Polać I; Wilczyński JR
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Oct; 84(10):857-61. PubMed ID: 24273908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Saline infusion sonohysterography versus hysteroscopy for uterine cavity evaluation.
Khan F; Jamaat S; Al-Jaroudi D
Ann Saudi Med; 2011; 31(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 21808116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of Tubal Patency: A Prospective Comparison of Diagnostic Hysteroscopy and Laparoscopic Chromopertubation.
Ott J; Hager M; Nouri K; Marschalek J; Kurz C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):135-140. PubMed ID: 30880158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hysterosalpingography versus sonohysterography for intrauterine abnormalities.
Acholonu UC; Silberzweig J; Stein DE; Keltz M
JSLS; 2011; 15(4):471-4. PubMed ID: 22643500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
