These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32199158)

  • 1. Investigating rear-end collision avoidance behavior under varied foggy weather conditions: A study using advanced driving simulator and survival analysis.
    Shangguan Q; Fu T; Liu S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 May; 139():105499. PubMed ID: 32199158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In-vehicle warnings for work zone and related rear-end collisions: A driving simulator experiment.
    Hang J; Yan X; Li X; Duan K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106768. PubMed ID: 35820314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
    Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analyzing the effect of fog weather conditions on driver lane-keeping performance using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study data.
    Das A; Ghasemzadeh A; Ahmed MM
    J Safety Res; 2019 Feb; 68():71-80. PubMed ID: 30876522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of cooperative systems on driver behavior in heavy fog condition based on a driving simulator.
    Chang X; Li H; Qin L; Rong J; Lu Y; Chen X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():197-205. PubMed ID: 31054492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of connected vehicle-based variable speed limit under different foggy conditions based on simulated driving.
    Zhao X; Xu W; Ma J; Li H; Chen Y; Rong J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():206-216. PubMed ID: 31055185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maximum acceptable speed based on physiological performance for different alignments of rural roads under the influence of visibility in fog-a driving simulator study.
    Wang K; Zhang W; Feng Z; Sze NN; Hu Z; Wang C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 32125892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Connected vehicle real-time traveler information messages for freeway speed harmonization under adverse weather conditions: Trajectory level analysis using driving simulator.
    Yang G; Ahmed M; Gaweesh S; Adomah E
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105707. PubMed ID: 32818760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Driving in fog: the effects of driving experience and visibility on speed compensation and hazard avoidance.
    Mueller AS; Trick LM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Sep; 48():472-9. PubMed ID: 22664714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using trajectory-level SHRP2 naturalistic driving data for investigating driver lane-keeping ability in fog: An association rules mining approach.
    Das A; Ahmed MM; Ghasemzadeh A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():250-262. PubMed ID: 31176145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimization of colored pavement considering driving behavior and psychological characteristics under dynamic low-visibility conditions related to fog-a driving simulator study.
    Wang K; Gudyanga B; Zhang W; Feng Z; Wang C; Yang B; Yang S
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2024; 25(3):518-526. PubMed ID: 38346171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.
    Shah D; Lee C
    J Safety Res; 2021 Sep; 78():242-250. PubMed ID: 34399920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating factors influencing drivers' speed selection behavior under reduced visibility conditions.
    Zhang W; Hu Z; Feng Z; Ma C; Wang K; Zhang X
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jul; 19(5):488-494. PubMed ID: 29630395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust.
    Koglbauer I; Holzinger J; Eichberger A; Lex C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):332-337. PubMed ID: 29227692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of experience and electronic stability control on low friction collision avoidance in a truck driving simulator.
    Markkula G; Benderius O; Wolff K; Wahde M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():1266-77. PubMed ID: 23122327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increase in rear-end collision risk by acute stress-induced fatigue in on-road truck driving.
    Minusa S; Mizuno K; Ojiro D; Tanaka T; Kuriyama H; Yamano E; Kuratsune H; Watanabe Y
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258892. PubMed ID: 34673839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of safety measures on driver's speed behavior at pedestrian crossings.
    Bella F; Silvestri M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Oct; 83():111-24. PubMed ID: 26253423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator.
    Lee JD; McGehee DV; Brown TL; Reyes ML
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(2):314-34. PubMed ID: 12452276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How do drivers avoid collisions? A driving simulator-based study.
    Li X; Rakotonirainy A; Yan X
    J Safety Res; 2019 Sep; 70():89-96. PubMed ID: 31848013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speed choice and driving performance in simulated foggy conditions.
    Brooks JO; Crisler MC; Klein N; Goodenough R; Beeco RW; Guirl C; Tyler PJ; Hilpert A; Miller Y; Grygier J; Burroughs B; Martin A; Ray R; Palmer C; Beck C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):698-705. PubMed ID: 21376857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.