BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32199338)

  • 1. Split Skin Graft Take in Leg Ulcers: Conventional Dressing Versus Locally Adapted Negative Pressure Dressing.
    Maduba CC; Nnadozie UU; Modekwe VI; Onah II
    J Surg Res; 2020 Jul; 251():296-302. PubMed ID: 32199338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing negative pressure dressing and conventional dressing methods on split-thickness skin grafts in burned patients.
    Petkar KS; Dhanraj P; Kingsly PM; Sreekar H; Lakshmanarao A; Lamba S; Shetty R; Zachariah JR
    Burns; 2011 Sep; 37(6):925-9. PubMed ID: 21723044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Clinical application of negative-pressure wound therapy in split-thickness skin grafting at hard-to-fix sites].
    Li SH; Zhang WF; Hu XL; Wang YC; Han F; Ji P; Han F; Hu DH; Guan H
    Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2020 Jul; 36(7):528-533. PubMed ID: 32842398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing hospital stay and patient satisfaction in a resource poor setting using conventional and locally adapted negative pressure wound dressing methods in management of leg ulcers with split skin grafts: a comparative prospective study.
    Maduba CC; Nnadozie UU; Modekwe VI; Nwankwo EU
    Pan Afr Med J; 2020; 36():105. PubMed ID: 32821316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Negative-pressure wound dressings to secure split-thickness skin grafts in the perineum.
    Lee KT; Pyon JK; Lim SY; Mun GH; Oh KS; Bang SI
    Int Wound J; 2014 Apr; 11(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 22958590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Negative-pressure therapy versus conventional therapy on split-thickness skin graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yin Y; Zhang R; Li S; Guo J; Hou Z; Zhang Y
    Int J Surg; 2018 Feb; 50():43-48. PubMed ID: 29292216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Antimicrobial-impregnated dressing combined with negative-pressure wound therapy increases split-thickness skin graft engraftment: a simple effective technique.
    Wu CC; Chew KY; Chen CC; Kuo YR
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2015 Jan; 28(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25502972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Improves Take Rate of Skin Graft in Irregular, High-Mobility Areas: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Cao X; Hu Z; Zhang Y; Wang P; Huang S; Zhu W; Dong Y; Xu H; Tang B; Zhu J
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Dec; 150(6):1341-1349. PubMed ID: 36161796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical application of negative pressure dressing in the full-thickness skin grafting].
    Liang PF; Hu JX; Zhang PH; Zhang MH; Ren LC; Zeng JZ; Zhou J; Guo L; Cui X; Huang MT; He ZY; Huang XY
    Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 34(7):492-496. PubMed ID: 30060353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Efficacy and Complications Between Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Conventional Mechanical Fixation in Skin Grafts: A Retrospective Analysis.
    Shen X; Zhan T; Wei D; Zhang H
    Wounds; 2019 Aug; 31(8):213-218. PubMed ID: 31298660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Occlusive drainage system for split-thickness skin graft: A prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Hsiao SF; Ma H; Wang YH; Wang TH
    Burns; 2017 Mar; 43(2):379-387. PubMed ID: 28341261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Split-skin graft in the management of diabetic foot ulcers.
    Mahmoud SM; Mohamed AA; Mahdi SE; Ahmed ME
    J Wound Care; 2008 Jul; 17(7):303-6. PubMed ID: 18705232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prospective, blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial of topical negative pressure use in skin grafting.
    Moisidis E; Heath T; Boorer C; Ho K; Deva AK
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Sep; 114(4):917-22. PubMed ID: 15468399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vacuum-assisted Closure in Integration of Skin Graft Over Scalp Wounds: A Randomised Control Trial.
    Mujahid AM; Khalid FA; Ali N; Sajjad Y; Khan H; Tarar MN
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2020 Feb; 30(2):163-167. PubMed ID: 32036824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. WOUND Study: A Cost-Utility Analysis of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Split-Skin Grafting for Lower Limb Skin Cancer.
    Ker H; Al-Murrani A; Rolfe G; Martin R
    J Surg Res; 2019 Mar; 235():308-314. PubMed ID: 30691811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of topical negative pressure (vacuum-assisted closure) to split-thickness skin grafts: a structured evidence-based review.
    Azzopardi EA; Boyce DE; Dickson WA; Azzopardi E; Laing JH; Whitaker IS; Shokrollahi K
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Jan; 70(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 23249474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Efficacy of Vacuum Dressing Versus Conventional Dressing Over Autologous Split Skin Grafts in Burn Wounds: A Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study.
    Babu B; Gaba S; John JR; Subair M
    J Burn Care Res; 2024 Mar; 45(2):468-477. PubMed ID: 37950743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of negative pressure therapy to enhance take of 1-stage allodermis and a split-thickness graft.
    Kim EK; Hong JP
    Ann Plast Surg; 2007 May; 58(5):536-40. PubMed ID: 17452839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Securing split-thickness skin grafts using negative-pressure wound therapy without suture fixation.
    Inatomi Y; Kadota H; Kamizono K; Hanada M; Yoshida S
    J Wound Care; 2019 Aug; 28(Sup8):S16-S21. PubMed ID: 31393782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An improved alternative to vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) as a negative pressure dressing in lower limb split skin grafting: a clinical trial.
    Rozen WM; Shahbaz S; Morsi A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008; 61(3):334-7. PubMed ID: 18267313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.