These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32199801)

  • 1. Optimising default radiographic exposure factors using Deviation Index.
    Creeden A; Curtis M
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 Nov; 26(4):308-313. PubMed ID: 32199801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimisation of Radiological Protection in Digital Radiology Techniques for Medical Imaging.
    ICRP PUBLICATION 154
    Ann ICRP; 2023 Jul; 52(3):11-145. PubMed ID: 39248042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiographer knowledge and practice of paediatric radiation dose protocols in digital radiography in Gauteng.
    Moolman N; Mulla F; Mdletshe S
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):117-121. PubMed ID: 32052787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are the target exposure index and deviation index used efficiently?
    Guðjónsdóttir J; Paalsson KE; Sveinsdóttir GP
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 Aug; 27(3):903-907. PubMed ID: 33707050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Digital radiography: are the manufacturers' settings too high? Optimisation of the Kodak digital radiography system with aid of the computed radiography dose index.
    Peters SE; Brennan PC
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Sep; 12(9):2381-7. PubMed ID: 12195499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Current state of practice regarding digital radiography exposure indicators and deviation indices: Report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 232.
    Dave JK; Jones AK; Fisher R; Hulme K; Rill L; Zamora D; Woodward A; Brady S; MacDougall RD; Goldman L; Lang S; Peck D; Apgar B; Shepard SJ; Uzenoff R; Willis C
    Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):e1146-e1160. PubMed ID: 30255505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of radiographers' knowledge and attitudes of image quality optimisation in paediatric digital radiography in Saudi Arabia and Australia: a survey-based study.
    Alsleem H; Davidson R; Al-Dhafiri B; Alsleem R; Ameer H
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2019 Dec; 66(4):229-237. PubMed ID: 31697039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
    Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Digital imaging and radiographic practise in diagnostic radiography: An overview of current knowledge and practice in Europe.
    Mc Fadden S; Roding T; de Vries G; Benwell M; Bijwaard H; Scheurleer J
    Radiography (Lond); 2018 May; 24(2):137-141. PubMed ID: 29605110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The clinical significance of modifying X-ray tube current-time product based on prior image deviation index for digital radiography.
    Takaki T; Fujibuchi T; Murakami S; Aoki T; Ohki M
    Phys Med; 2019 Jul; 63():35-40. PubMed ID: 31221406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of exposure index (IgM) in orthopaedic radiography.
    Lança L; Silva A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):112-8. PubMed ID: 18430719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increasing source-to-image distance to reduce radiation dose from digital radiography pelvic examinations.
    England A; Evans P; Harding L; Taylor EM; Charnock P; Williams G
    Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 25739106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
    Butler ML; Rainford L; Last J; Brennan PC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic radiography students' experiences of a practical method demonstrating the effect of milliampere-second in digital X-ray imaging systems.
    Lewis S
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 52(3):422-426. PubMed ID: 34261614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exposure index in digital radiography: initial results of awareness and knowledge from Nigerian digital radiography practices.
    Esien-Umo EO; Erim AE; Chiaghanam NO; Ogbu T; Ijever AW; Archibong BE; Osakwe CA; Ekpo EU
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2023 Mar; 54(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 36456458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monitoring clinical exposure index and deviation index for dose optimization based on national diagnostic reference level: Focusing on general radiography of extremities.
    Park H; Yoon Y; Kim E; Jeong H; Kim J
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(3):419-432. PubMed ID: 35124635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utilization of upper and lower limits of exposure index in clinical digital radiography.
    Funahashi M; Kashiyama K; Nakamura T; Shiraishi J
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2022 Dec; 15(4):349-357. PubMed ID: 36036873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.
    Huda W
    Pediatr Radiol; 2004 Oct; 34 Suppl 3():S173-82; discussion S234-41. PubMed ID: 15558259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the use of exposure indicators in digital x-ray imaging system: Gauteng South Africa.
    Lewis S; Pieterse T; Lawrence H
    Radiography (Lond); 2019 Aug; 25(3):e58-e62. PubMed ID: 31301792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.