These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32199801)
21. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging. Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Local diagnostic reference levels for typical radiographic procedures. Tonkopi E; Daniels C; Gale MJ; Schofield SC; Sorhaindo VA; Vanlarkin JL Can Assoc Radiol J; 2012 Nov; 63(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 22136965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. High kilovoltage digital exposure techniques and patient dosimetry. Fauber TL; Cohen TF; Dempsey MC Radiol Technol; 2011; 82(6):501-10. PubMed ID: 21771934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparative assessment of entrance surface doses in analogue and digital radiography during common radiographic examinations. Seo D; Jang S; Kim J; Kim J; Sung D; Kim H; Yoon Y Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Jan; 158(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 23887271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dose optimization for different medical imaging tasks from exposure index, exposure control factor, and MAS in digital radiography. Zhang M; Zhao B; Wang Y; Chen W; Hou L Health Phys; 2012 Sep; 103(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 22850227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Optimization of dental CBCT exposures through mAs reduction. Pauwels R; Seynaeve L; Henriques JC; de Oliveira-Santos C; Souza PC; Westphalen FH; Rubira-Bullen IR; Ribeiro-Rotta RF; Rockenbach MI; Haiter-Neto F; Pittayapat P; Bosmans H; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(9):20150108. PubMed ID: 26090934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. DOSIMETRY OF ADULT AND PEDIATRIC PATIENTS FOR COMMON DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY EXAMINATIONS. Rana BS; Kumar S; Sandhu IS; Singh NP Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Jun; 179(4):349-357. PubMed ID: 29342278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of kilovoltage, milliampere seconds, and focal spot size on image quality. Kei Ma W; Hogg P; Norton S Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(5):479-85. PubMed ID: 24806050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. COMPARISON OF RADIATION EXPOSURE TO THE PATIENT AND CONTRAST DETAIL RESOLUTIONS ACROSS LOW DOSE 2D/3D SLOT SCANNER AND TWO CONVENTIONAL DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY X-RAY IMAGING SYSTEMS. Abdi AJ; Mussmann B; Mackenzie A; Klaerke B; Andersen PE Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(2):252-265. PubMed ID: 30809672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. OPTIMIZING IMAGE QUALITY, RADIATION DOSAGE TO THE PATIENT AND TO THE DETECTOR IN PEDIATRIC CHEST RADIOGRAPHY: A PHANTOM STUDY OF A PORTABLE DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM. Shahgeldi K; Sjöberg T; Nordström J; Lesanu R; Svahn TM Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(4):414-420. PubMed ID: 30916753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of analogue and digital techniques in upper gastrointestinal examinations: absorbed dose and diagnostic quality of the images. Axelsson B; Bodén K; Fransson SG; Hansson IB; Persliden J; Witt HH Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(8):1351-4. PubMed ID: 10939506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Analysis of patient doses for myelogram and discogram examinations and their reduction through changes in equipment set-up. Martin CJ; Hunter S Br J Radiol; 1995 May; 68(809):508-14. PubMed ID: 7788237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector. Geijer H Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. PATIENT DOSE ASSESSMENT AND OPTIMISATION OF PELVIC RADIOGRAPHY WITH COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS. Abbeyquaye D; Inkoom S; Hammond NB; Fletcher JJ; Botwe BO Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 Aug; 195(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 34320643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quality assurance in digital dental imaging: a systematic review. Metsälä E; Henner A; Ekholm M Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Jul; 72(5):362-71. PubMed ID: 24074393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of two objective methods to optimize kVp and personnel exposure using a digital indirect flat panel detector and simulated veterinary patients. Copple C; Robertson ID; Thrall DE; Samei E Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2013; 54(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 23293957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Radiation exposure of children in pediatric radiology. Part 4: Entrance doses achieved during the X-ray examination of the chest]. Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1082-103. PubMed ID: 19009497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. International Commission on Radiological Protection Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Transition from screen-film to digital radiography: evolution of patient radiation doses at projection radiography. Vaño E; Fernández JM; Ten JI; Prieto C; González L; Rodríguez R; de las Heras H Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):461-6. PubMed ID: 17356174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]