192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32200300)
1. Dynamic current steering with phantom electrode in cochlear implants.
Luo X; Garrett C
Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107949. PubMed ID: 32200300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.
Klawitter S; Landsberger DM; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():64-75. PubMed ID: 29325874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Encoding pitch contours using current steering.
Luo X; Landsberger DM; Padilla M; Srinivasan AG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1215-23. PubMed ID: 20815457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Loudness and pitch perception using Dynamically Compensated Virtual Channels.
Nogueira W; Litvak LM; Landsberger DM; Büchner A
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():223-234. PubMed ID: 27939418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Current steering with partial tripolar stimulation mode in cochlear implants.
Wu CC; Luo X
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Apr; 14(2):213-31. PubMed ID: 23250685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pitch ranking, electrode discrimination, and physiological spread-of-excitation using Cochlear's dual-electrode mode.
Goehring JL; Neff DL; Baudhuin JL; Hughes ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):715-27. PubMed ID: 25096106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of Phantom Stimulation in Shifting the Pitch Percept in Cochlear Implant Users.
de Jong MAM; Briaire JJ; Biesheuvel JD; Snel-Bongers J; Böhringer S; Timp GRFM; Frijns JHM
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1258-1269. PubMed ID: 31977727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contour identification with pitch and loudness cues using cochlear implants.
Luo X; Masterson ME; Wu CC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):EL8-14. PubMed ID: 24437857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pitch matching in bimodal cochlear implant patients: Effects of frequency, spectral envelope, and level.
Maarefvand M; Blamey PJ; Marozeau J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):2854. PubMed ID: 29195427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Masking patterns for monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation in cochlear implants.
Saoji AA; Landsberger DM; Padilla M; Litvak LM
Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 298():109-16. PubMed ID: 23299125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Binaural timing information in electric hearing at low rates: Effects of inaccurate encoding and loudness.
Egger K; Majdak P; Laback B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3164. PubMed ID: 28599571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Forward masking patterns by low and high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant users: Differences in masking effectiveness and spread of neural excitation.
Zhou N; Dong L; Dixon S
Hear Res; 2020 Apr; 389():107921. PubMed ID: 32097828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterizing the relationship between modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution in cochlear implant users.
Camarena A; Goldsworthy RL
Hear Res; 2024 Jul; 448():109026. PubMed ID: 38776706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When singing with cochlear implants, are two ears worse than one for perilingually/postlingually deaf individuals?
Aronoff JM; Kirchner A; Abbs E; Harmon B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):EL503. PubMed ID: 29960471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
Baumann U; Rader T; Helbig S; Bahmer A
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of the Phantom Electrode strategy to improve bass frequency perception for music listening in cochlear implant users.
Munjal T; Roy AT; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S121-8. PubMed ID: 26561883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pitch adaptation patterns in bimodal cochlear implant users: over time and after experience.
Reiss LA; Ito RA; Eggleston JL; Liao S; Becker JJ; Lakin CE; Warren FM; McMenomey SO
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e23-34. PubMed ID: 25319401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Current steering creates additional pitch percepts in adult cochlear implant recipients.
Firszt JB; Koch DB; Downing M; Litvak L
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):629-36. PubMed ID: 17667771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
