These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32200850)
1. Re: Rosenfeld et al.: Warning: do not treat intermediate AMD with laser therapy (Ophthalmology. 2019;126:839-840). Marshall J; Cusumano A Ophthalmology; 2020 Apr; 127(4):e25-e26. PubMed ID: 32200850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Warning: Do Not Treat Intermediate AMD with Laser Therapy. Rosenfeld PJ; Feuer WJ Ophthalmology; 2019 Jun; 126(6):839-840. PubMed ID: 31122360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Re: Radhakrishnan et al.: Ophthalmic Technology Assessment: Laser peripheral iridotomy in primary angle closure: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology (Ophthalmology. 2018;125:1110-1120). Leffler CT Ophthalmology; 2018 Sep; 125(9):e59. PubMed ID: 30143096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Nanosecond-laser application in intermediate AMD: 12-month results of fundus appearance and macular function. Guymer RH; Brassington KH; Dimitrov P; Makeyeva G; Plunkett M; Xia W; Chauhan D; Vingrys A; Luu CD Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 42(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 24118741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Re: Hutnik et al.: Selective laser trabeculoplasty versus argon laser trabeculoplasty in glaucoma patients treated previously with 360° selective laser trabeculoplasty: a randomized, single-blind, equivalence clinical trial (Ophthalmology. 2019;126:223-232). Das Mohapatra SS; Sarma P; Sangma CA; Tayab S; Paul S; Borgohain M Ophthalmology; 2019 Nov; 126(11):e83. PubMed ID: 31635704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Re: Srinivasan et al.: Comparison of new visual disturbances after superior versus nasal/temporal laser peripheral iridotomy: a prospective randomized trial (Ophthalmology. 2018;125:345-351). Belovay GW; Vera V; Varma DK; Ahmed IIK Ophthalmology; 2018 May; 125(5):e36. PubMed ID: 29681306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Re: Abell et al.: Cost-effectiveness of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus phacoemulsification cataract surgery (Ophthalmology 2014;121:10-6). Schweitzer C; Hayes N; Brezin A; Cochener B; Denis P; Pisella PJ; Benard A; Ophthalmology; 2014 Oct; 121(10):e53-4. PubMed ID: 24974812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Curative laser therapy]. Fritz K; Salavastru C Hautarzt; 2018 Jan; 69(1):4. PubMed ID: 29302696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Re: Abell et al.: anterior capsulotomy integrity after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (ophthalmology 2014;121:17-24). Scott WJ Ophthalmology; 2014 Jul; 121(7):e35-6. PubMed ID: 24679836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Re: Maleki et al.: Selective laser trabeculoplasty in controlled uveitis with steroid-induced glaucoma (Ophthalmology. 2016;123:2630-2632). Chan K; Lee JWY; Young AL; Lam DSC Ophthalmology; 2017 Aug; 124(8):e63-e64. PubMed ID: 28734340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Re: Popvic et al.: Efficacy and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery compared with manual cataract surgery: a meta-anaylsis of 14 567 eyes (Ophthalmology. 2016;123:2113-2126). Kohnen T; Shajari M Ophthalmology; 2017 May; 124(5):e47-e48. PubMed ID: 28433136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]