These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
44. A comparison of CAD/CAM-based fixed retainers versus conventional fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Bardideh E; Ghorbani M; Shafaee H; Saeedi P; Younessian F Eur J Orthod; 2023 Sep; 45(5):545-557. PubMed ID: 37471113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The effects of fixed and removable orthodontic retainers: a systematic review. Al-Moghrabi D; Pandis N; Fleming PS Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):24. PubMed ID: 27459974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A two-year comparative assessment of retention of arch width increases between modified vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers: a multi-center randomized clinical trial. Ashari A; Nik Mustapha NM; Yuen JJX; Saw ZK; Lau MN; Xian L; Syed Mohamed AMF; Megat Abdul Wahab R; Yeoh CK; Deva Tata M; Sinnasamy S Prog Orthod; 2022 Aug; 23(1):40. PubMed ID: 36018418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Level of satisfaction in the use of the wraparound Hawley and thermoplastic maxillary retainers. Chagas AS; Freitas KMS; Cançado RH; Valarelli FP; Canuto LFG; Oliveira RCG; Oliveira RCG Angle Orthod; 2020 Jan; 90(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 31335161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Treatment stability with bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Dos Santos CCO; Henriques JFC; Janson G; Normando D Eur J Orthod; 2022 Mar; 44(2):187-196. PubMed ID: 34719722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Stability, survival, and patient satisfaction with CAD/CAM versus conventional multistranded fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a 6-month follow-up of a two-centre randomized controlled clinical trial. Gera A; Pullisaar H; Cattaneo PM; Gera S; Vandevska-Radunovic V; Cornelis MA Eur J Orthod; 2023 Feb; 45(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 35964235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Patient compliance to wear orthodontic retainers during postretention may vary by age, gender, and time since braces were removed. Vig KW J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(3 Suppl):202-3. PubMed ID: 23253846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Gingival health and relapse tendency: a split mouth randomized controlled trial of two positions of lower fixed retainers. Al-Nimri K; Al-Qaqaa S Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Aug; 28(8):462. PubMed ID: 39088117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Epidemiologic study of orthodontic retention procedures. Padmos JAD; Fudalej PS; Renkema AM Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 29602341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Patient compliance with orthodontic retainers in the postretention phase. Pratt MC; Kluemper GT; Lindstrom AF Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 21803257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of occlusal contacts with use of Hawley and clear overlay retainers. Sauget E; Covell DA; Boero RP; Lieber WS Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 9188967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Vacuum-formed retainers more effective than Hawley retainers. Ledvinka J Evid Based Dent; 2009; 10(2):47. PubMed ID: 19561579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. "Comparing the effectiveness, acceptability and oral hygiene status between vacuum formed retainer and Begg's retainer": a pilot study. Patnaik P; Nanda SB; Mishra S BMC Oral Health; 2023 May; 23(1):266. PubMed ID: 37161557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Stability, survival, patient satisfaction, and cost-minimization of CAD/CAM versus conventional multistranded fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a 2-year follow-up of a two-centre randomized controlled trial. Pullisaar H; Cattaneo PM; Gera A; Sankiewicz M; Bilińska M; Vandevska-Radunovic V; Cornelis MA Eur J Orthod; 2024 Apr; 46(2):. PubMed ID: 38394353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. What causes failure of fixed orthodontic retention? - systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Jedliński M; Grocholewicz K; Mazur M; Janiszewska-Olszowska J Head Face Med; 2021 Jul; 17(1):32. PubMed ID: 34301280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Post-treatment stability, survival time and periodontal health associated with vacuum-formed, bonded and rapid prototype retainers: A prospective clinical study. Murugaiyan S; Pottipalli Sathyanarayana H; Thakkar D; Padmanabhan S J Orthod; 2024 Jun; ():14653125241255702. PubMed ID: 38859624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A survey of patient compliance with removable orthodontic retainer wear in Brunei Darussalam. Lim ME; Dhaliwal JS; Wahab SWHA; Rahman HA BDJ Open; 2023 Mar; 9(1):10. PubMed ID: 36869042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]