These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32201459)

  • 1. Comparison of 9-Month Angiographic Follow-Up and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents and Second-Generation Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Single Coronary Artery Stenting.
    Tsai ML; Hsieh MJ; Chen CC; Chang SH; Wang CY; Chen DY; Yang CH; Yeh JK; Ho MY; Hsieh IC
    Acta Cardiol Sin; 2020 Mar; 36(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 32201459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-Year Safety and Efficacy of Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Second-Generation Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Data from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR).
    Hur SH; Kim IC; Won KB; Cho YK; Yoon HJ; Nam CW; Kim KB; Kim MS; Park J; Rha SW; Chae SC; Kim YJ; Kim CJ; Cho MC; Jeong MH; Ahn YK; Kim HS; Ahn TH; Seung KB; Jang Y; Yoon JH; Seong IW; Hong TJ; Bae JH; Park SJ;
    Clin Cardiol; 2016 May; 39(5):276-84. PubMed ID: 27028303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Durable-Polymer- and Biodegradable-Polymer-Based Newer-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Prediabetes After Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
    Kim YH; Her AY; Jeong MH; Kim BK; Hong SJ; Kim S; Ahn CM; Kim JS; Ko YG; Choi D; Hong MK; Jang Y
    Int Heart J; 2020 Jul; 61(4):673-684. PubMed ID: 32684595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Biodegradable-Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Second-Generation Durable-Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
    Sim HW; Thong EH; Djohan AH; Chen JZ; Ser JS; Loh PH; Lee CH; Chan MY; Low AF; Tay EL; Chan KH; Tan HC; Loh JP
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Feb; 35():98-103. PubMed ID: 33893053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ten-year clinical outcomes of polymer-free versus durable polymer new-generation drug-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease with and without diabetes mellitus : Results of the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol- and Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST 5) trial.
    Koch T; Lenz T; Joner M; Xhepa E; Koppara T; Wiebe J; Coughlan JJ; Aytekin A; Ibrahim T; Kessler T; Cassese S; Laugwitz KL; Schunkert H; Kastrati A; Kufner S;
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2021 Oct; 110(10):1586-1598. PubMed ID: 34156521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical outcomes with bioabsorbable polymer- versus durable polymer-based drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis.
    Palmerini T; Biondi-Zoccai G; Della Riva D; Mariani A; Sabaté M; Smits PC; Kaiser C; D'Ascenzo F; Frati G; Mancone M; Genereux P; Stone GW
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Feb; 63(4):299-307. PubMed ID: 24211507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stent to Second-Generation Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents.
    El-Hayek G; Bangalore S; Casso Dominguez A; Devireddy C; Jaber W; Kumar G; Mavromatis K; Tamis-Holland J; Samady H
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 10(5):462-473. PubMed ID: 28279314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis.
    Lv J; Wu Y; Zhang X; Jing T; Zhang L; Tong S; Song Z; Wang M; Wang G; Chi L
    Eur J Med Res; 2015 Mar; 20(1):21. PubMed ID: 25889197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents versus second-generation drug-eluting stents in patients with and without diabetes mellitus: a single-center study.
    Tang XF; Ma YL; Song Y; Xu JJ; Yao Y; He C; Wang HH; Jiang P; Jiang L; Liu R; Gao Z; Zhao XY; Qiao SB; Yang YJ; Gao RL; Xu B; Yuan JQ
    Cardiovasc Diabetol; 2018 Aug; 17(1):114. PubMed ID: 30107794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Final 5-Year Report From the COMPARE II Trial (Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent).
    Vlachojannis GJ; Smits PC; Hofma SH; Togni M; Vázquez N; Valdés M; Voudris V; Slagboom T; Goy JJ; den Heijer P; van der Ent M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 10(12):1215-1221. PubMed ID: 28579236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. One-year clinical outcomes between biodegradable-polymer-coated biolimus-eluting stent and durable-polymer-coated drug-eluting stents in STEMI patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing culprit-only or multivessel PCI.
    Kim YH; Her AY; Jeong MH; Kim BK; Lee SY; Hong SJ; Ahn CM; Kim JS; Ko YG; Choi D; Hong MK; Jang Y
    Atherosclerosis; 2019 May; 284():102-109. PubMed ID: 30877937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-Term Outcomes of Biodegradable Versus Second-Generation Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stent Implantations for Myocardial Infarction.
    Choe JC; Cha KS; Lee JG; Kim J; Shin JY; Ahn J; Park JS; Lee HW; Oh JH; Choi JH; Lee HC; Hong TJ; Jeong MH;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jan; 13(1):97-111. PubMed ID: 31918948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 2-year clinical and angiographic outcomes from a randomized trial of polymer-free dual drug-eluting stents versus polymer-based Cypher and Endeavor [corrected] drug-eluting stents.
    Byrne RA; Kastrati A; Tiroch K; Schulz S; Pache J; Pinieck S; Massberg S; Seyfarth M; Laugwitz KL; Birkmeier KA; Schömig A; Mehilli J;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jun; 55(23):2536-43. PubMed ID: 20417052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved safety and reduction in stent thrombosis associated with biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: final 5-year report of the LEADERS (Limus Eluted From A Durable Versus ERodable Stent Coating) randomized, noninferiority trial.
    Serruys PW; Farooq V; Kalesan B; de Vries T; Buszman P; Linke A; Ischinger T; Klauss V; Eberli F; Wijns W; Morice MC; Di Mario C; Corti R; Antoni D; Sohn HY; Eerdmans P; Rademaker-Havinga T; van Es GA; Meier B; Jüni P; Windecker S
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Aug; 6(8):777-89. PubMed ID: 23968698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized clinical trial comparing abluminal biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents: Nine months angiographic and 5-year clinical outcomes.
    Zhang H; Wang X; Deng W; Wang S; Ge J; Toft E
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Sep; 95(38):e4820. PubMed ID: 27661023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent vs. contemporary durable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Bavishi C; Chugh Y; Kimura T; Natsuaki M; Kaiser C; Gordon P; Aronow HD; Abbott JD
    Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes; 2020 Jan; 6(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 31228186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intravascular ultrasound to guide percutaneous coronary interventions: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(12):1-97. PubMed ID: 23074482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved clinical outcome with biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents compared to durable polymer drug-eluting stents for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Andriyati R; Firman D; Kurniawati Y; Alkatiri AA; Pranata R; Muliawan HS; Rossimarina V; Soerianata S
    Postgrad Med J; 2021 Oct; 97(1152):638-643. PubMed ID: 32796116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of current smoking on 2-year clinical outcomes between durable-polymer-coated stents and biodegradable-polymer-coated stents in acute myocardial infarction after successful percutaneous coronary intervention: Data from the KAMIR.
    Kim YH; Her AY; Jeong MH; Kim BK; Hong SJ; Shin DH; Kim JS; Ko YG; Choi D; Hong MK; Jang Y
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205046. PubMed ID: 30289945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A propensity score-matched comparison of biodegradable polymer vs second-generation durable polymer drug-eluting stents in a real-world population.
    Zhao YJ; Teng M; Khoo AL; Ananthakrishna R; Yeo TC; Lim BP; Loh JP; Chan MY
    Cardiovasc Ther; 2018 Apr; 36(2):. PubMed ID: 29316284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.