145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32205707)
1. Psychometric Validation of the Danish Version of the Oswestry Disability Index in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.
Comins J; Brodersen J; Wedderkopp N; Lassen MR; Shakir H; Specht K; Brorson S; Christensen KB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Aug; 45(16):1143-1150. PubMed ID: 32205707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-year comprehensive medical management of degenerative lumbar spine disease (lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis, or disc herniation): a value analysis of cost, pain, disability, and quality of life: clinical article.
Parker SL; Godil SS; Mendenhall SK; Zuckerman SL; Shau DN; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 24785973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the EuroQOL-5D with the Oswestry Disability Index, back and leg pain scores in patients with degenerative lumbar spine pathology.
Mueller B; Carreon LY; Glassman SD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(9):757-61. PubMed ID: 23124265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inadequacy of 3-month Oswestry Disability Index outcome for assessing individual longer-term patient experience after lumbar spine surgery.
Asher AL; Chotai S; Devin CJ; Speroff T; Harrell FE; Nian H; Dittus RS; Mummaneni PV; Knightly JJ; Glassman SD; Bydon M; Archer KR; Foley KT; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 26989974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Grotle M; Solberg T; Brox JI; Hermansen E; Rekeland F; Indrekvam K; Storheim K; Hellum C
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 30658613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Psychometric Properties Study of the Oswestry Disability Index in a Spanish Population With Previous Lumbar Disc Surgery: Homogeneity and Validity.
Selva-Sevilla C; Ferrara P; Gerónimo-Pardo M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):E430-E437. PubMed ID: 30234803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Paul AR; Anderson WN; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Asher AL; Kerezoudis P; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Slotkin JR; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk MS; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E2. PubMed ID: 29290132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cost-utility analysis of Dynesys dynamic stabilization versus instrumented fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases.
Liu K; Sun W; Lu Q; Chen J; Tang J
J Orthop Sci; 2017 Nov; 22(6):982-987. PubMed ID: 28807742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lumbar fusion outcomes stratified by specific diagnostic indication.
Glassman SD; Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Dimar JR; Johnson JR; Puno RM; Campbell MJ
Spine J; 2009; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 18805059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Objective functional assessment using the "Timed Up and Go" test in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Stienen MN; Maldaner N; Joswig H; Corniola MV; Bellut D; Prömmel P; Regli L; Weyerbrock A; Schaller K; Gautschi OP
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E4. PubMed ID: 31042663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictors of the efficacy of epidural steroid injections for structural lumbar degenerative pathology.
Sivaganesan A; Chotai S; Parker SL; Asher AL; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
Spine J; 2016 Aug; 16(8):928-34. PubMed ID: 26689476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oswestry Disability Index: a psychometric analysis with 1,610 patients.
Brodke DS; Goz V; Lawrence BD; Spiker WR; Neese A; Hung M
Spine J; 2017 Mar; 17(3):321-327. PubMed ID: 27693732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.
McGirt MJ; Bydon M; Archer KR; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Parker SL; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; Asher AL
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):357-369. PubMed ID: 28498074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can the anxiety domain of EQ-5D and mental health items from SF-36 help predict outcomes after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders?
Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Dimar JR; Owens RK; Crawford CH; Puno RM; Bratcher KR; McGraw KE; Glassman SD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Sep; 25(3):352-6. PubMed ID: 27153141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
