These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32206936)

  • 1. Prioritization in visual working memory enhances memory retention and speeds up processing in a comparison task.
    Poth CH
    Cogn Process; 2020 Aug; 21(3):331-339. PubMed ID: 32206936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orienting Attention to Auditory and Visual Short-term Memory: The Roles of Age, Hearing Loss, and Cognitive Status.
    Garami L; Chow R; Fakuade A; Swaminathan S; Alain C
    Exp Aging Res; 2020; 46(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 31750789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The development of retro-cue benefits with extensive practice: Implications for capacity estimation and attentional states in visual working memory.
    Zerr P; Gayet S; van den Esschert F; Kappen M; Olah Z; Van der Stigchel S
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):1036-1049. PubMed ID: 33616865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual working memory enhances target discrimination accuracy with single-item displays.
    Pan Y; Zhang X
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Aug; 82(6):3005-3012. PubMed ID: 32488644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Getting more from visual working memory: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference.
    Souza AS; Rerko L; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jun; 42(6):890-910. PubMed ID: 26752731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the fate of non-cued mental representations in visuo-spatial working memory: Evidence by a retro-cuing paradigm.
    Schneider D; Mertes C; Wascher E
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 293():114-24. PubMed ID: 26196953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations.
    Gunseli E; van Moorselaar D; Meeter M; Olivers CN
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1334-41. PubMed ID: 25563713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Probabilistic retro-cues do not determine state in visual working memory.
    Dube B; Lumsden A; Al-Aidroos N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):641-646. PubMed ID: 30276638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid influences of cued visual memories on attentional guidance.
    van Moorselaar D; Battistoni E; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():1-10. PubMed ID: 25428708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sustained attention required for effective dimension-based retro-cue benefit in visual working memory.
    Liu R; Guo L; Sun HJ; Parviainen T; Zhou Z; Cheng Y; Liu Q; Ye C
    J Vis; 2023 May; 23(5):13. PubMed ID: 37191630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual Working Memory Enhances the Neural Response to Matching Visual Input.
    Gayet S; Guggenmos M; Christophel TB; Haynes JD; Paffen CLE; Van der Stigchel S; Sterzer P
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 37(28):6638-6647. PubMed ID: 28592696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unloading and reloading working memory: attending to one item frees capacity.
    Souza AS; Rerko L; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Jun; 40(3):1237-56. PubMed ID: 24730737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of attentional selection on working memory for depth in a retro-cueing paradigm.
    Li Z; Tong M; Chen S; Qian J
    Mem Cognit; 2021 May; 49(4):747-757. PubMed ID: 33415712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Manipulating the focus of attention in working memory: Evidence for a protection of multiple items against perceptual interference.
    Barth A; Schneider D
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13062. PubMed ID: 29315628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social attention directs working memory maintenance.
    Nie QY; Ding X; Chen J; Conci M
    Cognition; 2018 Feb; 171():85-94. PubMed ID: 29121587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retro-cue benefits in working memory without sustained focal attention.
    Rerko L; Souza AS; Oberauer K
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Jul; 42(5):712-28. PubMed ID: 24442551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time-resolved neuroimaging of visual short term memory consolidation by post-perceptual attention shifts.
    Hecht M; Thiemann U; Freitag CM; Bender S
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 125():964-977. PubMed ID: 26571051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the contribution of motor planning to the retroactive cuing benefit in working memory: Evidence by mu and beta oscillatory activity in the EEG.
    Schneider D; Barth A; Wascher E
    Neuroimage; 2017 Nov; 162():73-85. PubMed ID: 28847491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect.
    Souza AS; Oberauer K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):1839-60. PubMed ID: 27098647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of retro-cue validity on working memory representation: Evidence from electroencephalograms.
    Fu X; Ye C; Hu Z; Li Z; Liang T; Liu Q
    Biol Psychol; 2022 Apr; 170():108320. PubMed ID: 35337895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.