These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32207408)

  • 1. Angiography-based quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease and severe aortic stenosis.
    Mejía-Rentería H; Nombela-Franco L; Paradis JM; Lunardi M; Lee JM; Amat-Santos IJ; Veiga Fernandez G; Kalra A; Bansal EJ; de la Torre Hernandez JM; Rodés-Cabau J; Ribichini FL; Escaned J;
    EuroIntervention; 2020 Jul; 16(4):e285-e292. PubMed ID: 32207408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis by Quantitative Flow Ratio During Invasive Coronary Angiography: The WIFI II Study (Wire-Free Functional Imaging II).
    Westra J; Tu S; Winther S; Nissen L; Vestergaard MB; Andersen BK; Holck EN; Fox Maule C; Johansen JK; Andreasen LN; Simonsen JK; Zhang Y; Kristensen SD; Maeng M; Kaltoft A; Terkelsen CJ; Krusell LR; Jakobsen L; Reiber JHC; Lassen JF; Bøttcher M; Bøtker HE; Christiansen EH; Holm NR
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Mar; 11(3):e007107. PubMed ID: 29555835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis.
    Xu B; Tu S; Qiao S; Qu X; Chen Y; Yang J; Guo L; Sun Z; Li Z; Tian F; Fang W; Chen J; Li W; Guan C; Holm NR; Wijns W; Hu S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 70(25):3077-3087. PubMed ID: 29101020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Performance of In-Procedure Angiography-Derived Quantitative Flow Reserve Compared to Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: The FAVOR II Europe-Japan Study.
    Westra J; Andersen BK; Campo G; Matsuo H; Koltowski L; Eftekhari A; Liu T; Di Serafino L; Di Girolamo D; Escaned J; Nef H; Naber C; Barbierato M; Tu S; Neghabat O; Madsen M; Tebaldi M; Tanigaki T; Kochman J; Somi S; Esposito G; Mercone G; Mejia-Renteria H; Ronco F; Bøtker HE; Wijns W; Christiansen EH; Holm NR
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2018 Jul; 7(14):. PubMed ID: 29980523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of Microcirculatory Dysfunction on Angiography-Based Functional Assessment of Coronary Stenoses.
    Mejía-Rentería H; Lee JM; Lauri F; van der Hoeven NW; de Waard GA; Macaya F; Pérez-Vizcayno MJ; Gonzalo N; Jiménez-Quevedo P; Nombela-Franco L; Salinas P; Núñez-Gil I; Del Trigo M; Goto S; Lee HJ; Liontou C; Fernández-Ortiz A; Macaya C; van Royen N; Koo BK; Escaned J
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Apr; 11(8):741-753. PubMed ID: 29673505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity and correlation of quantitative flow ratio with fractional flow reserve for assessment of intermediate coronary lesions.
    Kasinadhuni G; Batta A; Gawalkar AA; Budakoty S; Gupta A; Vijayvergiya R
    Acta Cardiol; 2023 Feb; 78(1):91-98. PubMed ID: 35382706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative flow ratio derived from diagnostic coronary angiography in assessment of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis: a wire-free fractional flow reserve study.
    Kołtowski Ł; Zaleska M; Maksym J; Tomaniak M; Soliński M; Puchta D; Holm NR; Opolski G; Kochman J
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 107(9):858-867. PubMed ID: 30128817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study.
    Tu S; Westra J; Yang J; von Birgelen C; Ferrara A; Pellicano M; Nef H; Tebaldi M; Murasato Y; Lansky A; Barbato E; van der Heijden LC; Reiber JHC; Holm NR; Wijns W;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Oct; 9(19):2024-2035. PubMed ID: 27712739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of quantitative flow ratio in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Sejr-Hansen M; Christiansen EH; Ahmad Y; Vendrik J; Westra J; Holm NR; Thim T; Seligman H; Hall K; Sen S; Terkelsen CJ; Eftekhari A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Jan; 99(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 33533535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative flow ratio for evaluation of borderline coronary lesions in patients with severe aortic stenosis.
    Kleczynski P; Dziewierz A; Rzeszutko L; Dudek D; Legutko J
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2022 Jun; 75(6):472-478. PubMed ID: 34024746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic Agreement of Quantitative Flow Ratio With Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio.
    Hwang D; Choi KH; Lee JM; Mejía-Rentería H; Kim J; Park J; Rhee TM; Jeon KH; Lee HJ; Kim HK; Park TK; Yang JH; Song YB; Shin ES; Nam CW; Kwak JJ; Doh JH; Hahn JY; Choi JH; Choi SH; Escaned J; Koo BK; Gwon HC
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Apr; 8(8):e011605. PubMed ID: 30977410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. QFR Versus FFR Derived From Computed Tomography for Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis.
    Tanigaki T; Emori H; Kawase Y; Kubo T; Omori H; Shiono Y; Sobue Y; Shimamura K; Hirata T; Matsuo Y; Ota H; Kitabata H; Okubo M; Ino Y; Matsuo H; Akasaka T
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Oct; 12(20):2050-2059. PubMed ID: 31648766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of coronary CT angiography-based and invasive coronary angiography-based quantitative flow ratio for functional assessment of coronary stenosis: A multicenter retrospective analysis.
    Li Z; Li G; Chen L; Ding D; Chen Y; Zhang J; Xu L; Kubo T; Zhang S; Wang Y; Zhou X; Tu S
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2022; 16(6):509-516. PubMed ID: 35811245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatic coronary blood flow computation: validation in quantitative flow ratio from coronary angiography.
    Zhang Y; Zhang S; Westra J; Ding D; Zhao Q; Yang J; Sun Z; Huang J; Pu J; Xu B; Tu S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr; 35(4):587-595. PubMed ID: 30535657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of resting distal to aortic coronary pressure with angiography-based quantitative flow ratio.
    Stähli BE; Erbay A; Steiner J; Klotsche J; Mochmann HC; Skurk C; Lauten A; Landmesser U; Leistner DM
    Int J Cardiol; 2019 Mar; 279():12-17. PubMed ID: 30545620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optical coherence tomography-defined plaque vulnerability in relation to functional stenosis severity stratified by fractional flow reserve and quantitative flow ratio.
    Kanno Y; Sugiyama T; Hoshino M; Usui E; Hamaya R; Kanaji Y; Murai T; Lee T; Yonetsu T; Kakuta T
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Sep; 96(3):E238-E247. PubMed ID: 32012438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applicability of quantitative flow ratio for rapid evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis: comparison with instantaneous wave-free ratio in clinical practice.
    Watarai M; Otsuka M; Yazaki K; Inagaki Y; Kahata M; Kumagai A; Inoue K; Koganei H; Enta K; Ishii Y
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Nov; 35(11):1963-1969. PubMed ID: 31243612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy and reproducibility of fast fractional flow reserve computation from invasive coronary angiography.
    van Rosendael AR; Koning G; Dimitriu-Leen AC; Smit JM; Montero-Cabezas JM; van der Kley F; Jukema JW; Reiber JHC; Bax JJ; Scholte AJHA
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1305-1312. PubMed ID: 28642995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Offline Assessment of the Quantitative Flow Ratio: Is it Useful in Clinical Practice?
    de Moura Santos L; Borges Carvalho W; Ribeiro MH; Medeiros Lopes MAAA; da Silva EF; Fukushima JT; Abizaid AAC; Campos CM
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2022 Aug; 34(8):E620-E626. PubMed ID: 35920731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic performance of intravascular ultrasound-based fractional flow reserve versus angiography-based quantitative flow ratio measurements for evaluating left main coronary artery stenosis.
    Sui Y; Yang M; Xu Y; Wu N; Qian J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 May; 99 Suppl 1():1403-1409. PubMed ID: 35129284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.