158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32207551)
1. An effective evidence-based cleaning method for the safe reuse of intermittent urinary catheters: In vitro testing.
Wilks SA; Morris NS; Thompson R; Prieto JA; Macaulay M; Moore KN; Keevil CW; Fader M
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Mar; 39(3):907-915. PubMed ID: 32207551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Randomized Clinical Trial Using Sterile Single Use and Reused Polyvinylchloride Catheters for Intermittent Catheterization with a Clean Technique in Spina Bifida Cases: Short-Term Urinary Tract Infection Outcomes.
Madero-Morales PA; Robles-Torres JI; Vizcarra-Mata G; Guillén-Lozoya AH; Mendoza-Olazarán S; Garza-González E; Gutiérrez-González A
J Urol; 2019 Jul; 202(1):153-158. PubMed ID: 30916625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the microbiological milieu of patients randomized to either hydrophilic or conventional PVC catheters for clean intermittent catheterization.
Lucas EJ; Baxter C; Singh C; Mohamed AZ; Li B; Zhang J; Jayanthi VR; Koff SA; VanderBrink B; Justice SS
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Jun; 12(3):172.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26951923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reuse versus single-use catheters for intermittent catheterization: what is safe and preferred? Review of current status.
Håkansson MÅ
Spinal Cord; 2014 Jul; 52(7):511-6. PubMed ID: 24861702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biofilm Development on Urinary Catheters Promotes the Appearance of Viable but Nonculturable Bacteria.
Wilks SA; Koerfer VV; Prieto JA; Fader M; Keevil CW
mBio; 2021 Mar; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 33758085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized Crossover Trial of Single Use Hydrophilic Coated vs Multiple Use Polyvinylchloride Catheters for Intermittent Catheterization to Determine Incidence of Urinary Infection.
Kiddoo D; Sawatzky B; Bascu CD; Dharamsi N; Afshar K; Moore KN
J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):174-9. PubMed ID: 25584995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The microbiological and physical properties of catheters for intermittent catheterization: a systematic review on the impact of reuse and cleaning.
Grasdal M; Walter M; Krassioukov AV
Spinal Cord; 2022 Jul; 60(7):581-593. PubMed ID: 35066573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reuse of intermittent catheters: a qualitative study of IC users' perspectives.
Avery M; Prieto J; Okamoto I; Cullen S; Clancy B; Moore KN; Macaulay M; Fader M
BMJ Open; 2018 Aug; 8(8):e021554. PubMed ID: 30121601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intermittent catheterization with single- or multiple-reuse catheters: clinical study on safety and impact on quality of life.
Newman DK; New PW; Heriseanu R; Petronis S; Håkansson J; Håkansson MÅ; Lee BB
Int Urol Nephrol; 2020 Aug; 52(8):1443-1451. PubMed ID: 32172456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Catheter cleaning for re-use in intermittent catheterization: new light on an old problem.
Lavallée DJ; Lapierre NM; Henwood PK; Pivik JR; Best M; Springthorpe VS; Sattar SA
SCI Nurs; 1995 Mar; 12(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 7792576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multiuse Catheters for Clean Intermittent Catheterization in Urinary Retention: Is There Evidence of Inferiority?
van Doorn T; Blok BFM
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Sep; 6(5):809-810. PubMed ID: 31606472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Best practice for patient self-cleaning of urinary drainage bags.
Nash MA
Urol Nurs; 2003 Oct; 23(5):334, 339. PubMed ID: 14621355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Editorial Comment: An Effective Evidence-Based Cleaning Method for the Safe Reuse of Intermittent Urinary Catheters: In Vitro Testing.
Averbeck MA; Welk B
Int Braz J Urol; 2020; 46(5):843-844. PubMed ID: 32648424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The efficacy of different cleaning and disinfection procedures to reduce Salmonella and Enterobacteriaceae in the lairage environment of a pig abattoir.
Walia K; Argüello H; Lynch H; Grant J; Leonard FC; Lawlor PG; Gardiner GE; Duffy G
Int J Food Microbiol; 2017 Apr; 246():64-71. PubMed ID: 28189901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigations of the effectiveness of detergent washing, drying and chemical disinfection on contamination of cleaning cloths.
Scott E; Bloomfield SF
J Appl Bacteriol; 1990 Mar; 68(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 2341327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Intermittent catheterization: What are the environmental impacts and how can they be reduced?].
Le Garrec D; Chesnel C; Teng M; Lagnau P; Brouchet M; Chea M; Amarenco G; Hentzen C
Prog Urol; 2023 Sep; 33(11):533-540. PubMed ID: 37596127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison study of home catheter cleaning methods.
Kurtz MJ; Van Zandt K; Burns JL
Rehabil Nurs; 1995; 20(4):212-4, 217. PubMed ID: 7617966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The physical and antimicrobial effects of microwave heating and alcohol immersion on catheters that are reused for clean intermittent catheterisation.
Bogaert GA; Goeman L; de Ridder D; Wevers M; Ivens J; Schuermans A
Eur Urol; 2004 Nov; 46(5):641-6. PubMed ID: 15474276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic urinary catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analyses.
Rognoni C; Tarricone R
BMC Urol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):4. PubMed ID: 28073354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A cleaning protocol for rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.
Parashos P; Linsuwanont P; Messer HH
Aust Dent J; 2004 Mar; 49(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 15104130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]