BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32208006)

  • 1. Use of an Online Crowdsourcing Platform to Assess Patient Comprehension of Radiology Reports and Colloquialisms.
    Cho JK; Zafar HM; Cook TS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jun; 214(6):1316-1320. PubMed ID: 32208006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient-Centered Radiology Reporting: Using Online Crowdsourcing to Assess the Effectiveness of a Web-Based Interactive Radiology Report.
    Short RG; Middleton D; Befera NT; Gondalia R; Tailor TD
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2017 Nov; 14(11):1489-1497. PubMed ID: 29101973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Potential Pitfalls of Online Crowdsourcing to Assess Patient Comprehension of Radiology Reports.
    Short RG; Wildman-Tobriner B; Befera NT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Dec; 215(6):W65. PubMed ID: 33216627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. JOURNAL CLUB: Structured Feedback From Patients on Actual Radiology Reports: A Novel Approach to Improve Reporting Practices.
    Gunn AJ; Gilcrease-Garcia B; Mangano MD; Sahani DV; Boland GW; Choy G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1262-1270. PubMed ID: 28402133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interpretive Differences Between Patients and Radiologists Regarding the Diagnostic Confidence Associated With Commonly Used Phrases in the Radiology Report.
    Mityul MI; Gilcrease-Garcia B; Searleman A; Demertzis JL; Gunn AJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):123-126. PubMed ID: 29023151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Journal Club: Structured radiology reports are more complete and more effective than unstructured reports.
    Marcovici PA; Taylor GA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Dec; 203(6):1265-71. PubMed ID: 25415704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing Pictograph Recognition: A Comparison of Crowdsourcing and Traditional Survey Approaches.
    Kuang J; Argo L; Stoddard G; Bray BE; Zeng-Treitler Q
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Dec; 17(12):e281. PubMed ID: 26678085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Crowd control: Effectively utilizing unscreened crowd workers for biomedical data annotation.
    Cocos A; Qian T; Callison-Burch C; Masino AJ
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 May; 69():86-92. PubMed ID: 28389234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patients' Use and Evaluation of an Online System to Annotate Radiology Reports with Lay Language Definitions.
    Cook TS; Oh SC; Kahn CE
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1169-1174. PubMed ID: 28433519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chest Radiograph Reporting: Public Preferences and Perceptions.
    Dabrowiecki A; Sadigh G; Duszak R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Oct; 17(10):1259-1268. PubMed ID: 32413350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Doodle Health: A Crowdsourcing Game for the Co-design and Testing of Pictographs to Reduce Disparities in Healthcare Communication.
    Christensen C; Redd D; Lake E; Shipman JP; Aiono H; Altizer R; Bray BE; Zeng QT
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2017; 2017():585-594. PubMed ID: 29854123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Impact of an Online Crowdsourcing Diagnostic Tool on Health Care Utilization: A Case Study Using a Novel Approach to Retrospective Claims Analysis.
    Juusola JL; Quisel TR; Foschini L; Ladapo JA
    J Med Internet Res; 2016 Jun; 18(6):e127. PubMed ID: 27251384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Use of an Electronic Health Record Patient Portal to Access Diagnostic Test Results by Emergency Patients at an Academic Medical Center: Retrospective Study.
    Foster B; Krasowski MD
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jun; 21(6):e13791. PubMed ID: 31254335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prioritizing research topics: a comparison of crowdsourcing and patient registry.
    Truitt AR; Monsell SE; Avins AL; Nerenz DR; Lawrence SO; Bauer Z; Comstock BA; Edwards TC; Patrick DL; Jarvik JG; Lavallee DC
    Qual Life Res; 2018 Jan; 27(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 28382522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What the Patient Wants: An Analysis of Radiology-Related Inquiries From a Web-Based Patient Portal.
    Mervak BM; Davenport MS; Flynt KA; Kazerooni EA; Weadock WJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Nov; 13(11):1311-1318. PubMed ID: 27451118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using crowdsourcing to evaluate published scientific literature: methods and example.
    Brown AW; Allison DB
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e100647. PubMed ID: 24988466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Crowdsourcing utility estimation for spina bifida in the general population.
    Jiang R; Inouye BM; Wang HS; Tejwani R; Routh JC
    J Pediatr Rehabil Med; 2017 Dec; 10(3-4):257-266. PubMed ID: 29125514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient Access to Online Radiology Reports: Frequency and Sociodemographic Characteristics Associated with Use.
    Miles RC; Hippe DS; Elmore JG; Wang CL; Payne TH; Lee CI
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):1162-9. PubMed ID: 27287715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rapid grading of fundus photographs for diabetic retinopathy using crowdsourcing.
    Brady CJ; Villanti AC; Pearson JL; Kirchner TR; Gupta OP; Shah CP
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Oct; 16(10):e233. PubMed ID: 25356929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Natural language processing using online analytic processing for assessing recommendations in radiology reports.
    Dang PA; Kalra MK; Blake MA; Schultz TJ; Stout M; Lemay PR; Freshman DJ; Halpern EF; Dreyer KJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Mar; 5(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 18312968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.