These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32208649)

  • 1. Group Contribution Method to Predict the Mass Transfer Coefficients of Organics through Various RO Membranes.
    Kibler R; Mohrhardt B; Zhang M; Breitner L; Howe KJ; Minakata D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Apr; 54(8):5167-5177. PubMed ID: 32208649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Functional Chemistry on the Rejection of Low-Molecular Weight Neutral Organics through Reverse Osmosis Membranes for Potable Reuse.
    Breitner LN; Howe KJ; Minakata D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Oct; 53(19):11401-11409. PubMed ID: 31513383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Boron Can Be Used to Predict Trace Organic Rejection through Reverse Osmosis Membranes for Potable Reuse.
    Breitner LN; Howe KJ; Minakata D
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Dec; 52(23):13871-13878. PubMed ID: 30444356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of reverse osmosis membrane age on rejection of NDMA precursors and formation of NDMA in finished water after full advanced treatment for potable reuse.
    Roback SL; Ishida KP; Plumlee MH
    Chemosphere; 2019 Oct; 233():120-131. PubMed ID: 31170582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of interaction between low molecular weight neutral organic compounds and a polyamide RO membrane in the rejection mechanism.
    Zhang M; Breitner L; Howe KJ; Minakata D
    RSC Adv; 2020 Apr; 10(26):15642-15649. PubMed ID: 35495441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up.
    D'Haese A; Le-Clech P; Van Nevel S; Verbeken K; Cornelissen ER; Khan SJ; Verliefde AR
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(14):5232-44. PubMed ID: 23866149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rejection of emerging organic micropollutants in nanofiltration-reverse osmosis membrane applications.
    Xu P; Drewes JE; Bellona C; Amy G; Kim TU; Adam M; Heberer T
    Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15765934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High rejection reverse osmosis membrane for removal of N-nitrosamines and their precursors.
    Fujioka T; Ishida KP; Shintani T; Kodamatani H
    Water Res; 2018 Mar; 131():45-51. PubMed ID: 29268083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes.
    Yüksel S; Kabay N; Yüksel M
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 2():307-10. PubMed ID: 23731784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Permeability of uncharged organic molecules in reverse osmosis desalination membranes.
    Dražević E; Košutić K; Svalina M; Catalano J
    Water Res; 2017 Jun; 116():13-22. PubMed ID: 28292676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis.
    Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2683-92. PubMed ID: 22402269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the impacts of membrane type, coating, fouling, chemical properties and water chemistry on reverse osmosis rejection of seven nitrosoalklyamines, including NDMA.
    Steinle-Darling E; Zedda M; Plumlee MH; Ridgway HF; Reinhard M
    Water Res; 2007 Sep; 41(17):3959-67. PubMed ID: 17582457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response surface methodology and artificial neural network modelling for the performance evaluation of pilot-scale hybrid nanofiltration (NF) & reverse osmosis (RO) membrane system for the treatment of brackish ground water.
    Srivastava A; K A; Nair A; Ram S; Agarwal S; Ali J; Singh R; Garg MC
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 278(Pt 1):111497. PubMed ID: 33130432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
    Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Nanofiltration Decision Tool for Potable Reuse: A New Rejection Model for Recalcitrant CECs.
    Jones SM; Watts MJ; Wickramasinghe SR
    Water Environ Res; 2017 Nov; 89(11):1942-1951. PubMed ID: 28577313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rotating reverse osmosis: a dynamic model for flux and rejection.
    Lee S; Lueptow RM
    J Memb Sci; 2001 Oct; 192(2):129-43. PubMed ID: 11757575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rejection of organic compounds by ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis membrane.
    Ozaki H; Li H
    Water Res; 2002 Jan; 36(1):123-30. PubMed ID: 11766787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. N-nitrosamine rejection by reverse osmosis membranes: a full-scale study.
    Fujioka T; Khan SJ; McDonald JA; Roux A; Poussade Y; Drewes JE; Nghiem LD
    Water Res; 2013 Oct; 47(16):6141-8. PubMed ID: 24008222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rejection of haloacetic acids in water by multi-stage reverse osmosis: Efficiency, mechanisms, and influencing factors.
    Wang L; Sun Y; Chen B
    Water Res; 2018 Nov; 144():383-392. PubMed ID: 30056322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Removal of antibiotics and estrogens by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
    Yang L; Xia C; Jiang J; Chen X; Zhou Y; Yuan C; Bai L; Meng S; Cao G
    J Hazard Mater; 2024 Jan; 461():132628. PubMed ID: 37783143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.