These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32209124)

  • 1. The effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation in functional outcome and quality of life (QoL) of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) requiring surgery.
    Ko S; Chae S; Choi W; Kwon J; Choi JY
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 15(1):117. PubMed ID: 32209124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in vitamin D status after surgery in female patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and its clinical significance.
    Kim TH; Yoon JY; Lee BH; Jung HS; Park MS; Park JO; Moon ES; Kim HS; Lee HM; Moon SH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(21):E1326-30. PubMed ID: 22805343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical Outcomes of Posterolateral Fusion vs. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Instability.
    Farrokhi MR; Yadollahikhales G; Gholami M; Mousavi SR; Mesbahi AR; Asadi-Pooya AA
    Pain Physician; 2018 Jul; 21(4):383-406. PubMed ID: 30045595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and its relationship with pain.
    Kim TH; Lee BH; Lee HM; Lee SH; Park JO; Kim HS; Kim SW; Moon SH
    Pain Physician; 2013; 16(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 23511683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term clinical outcomes after bilateral laminotomy or total laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-institution experience.
    Pietrantonio A; Trungu S; Famà I; Forcato S; Miscusi M; Raco A
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E2. PubMed ID: 31042648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective functional assessment using the "Timed Up and Go" test in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Stienen MN; Maldaner N; Joswig H; Corniola MV; Bellut D; Prömmel P; Regli L; Weyerbrock A; Schaller K; Gautschi OP
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E4. PubMed ID: 31042663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of obesity on complications and outcomes: a comparison of fusion and nonfusion lumbar spine surgery.
    Onyekwelu I; Glassman SD; Asher AL; Shaffrey CI; Mummaneni PV; Carreon LY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):158-162. PubMed ID: 27740396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Outcomes and Complications of Surgical Treatment for LSS at 1-Year Follow-up - Prospective Study].
    Ježek J; Waldauf P; Krbec M; Douša P; Skála-Rosenbaum J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2019; 86(4):256-263. PubMed ID: 31524586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spinal sagittal balance status affects postoperative actual falls and quality of life after decompression and fusion in-situ surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Lee BH; Park JO; Kim HS; Suk KS; Lee SY; Lee HM; Yang JH; Moon SH
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2016 Sep; 148():52-9. PubMed ID: 27398622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Obesity is associated with inferior results after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a study of 2633 patients from the Swedish spine register.
    Knutsson B; Michaëlsson K; Sandén B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Mar; 38(5):435-41. PubMed ID: 22941097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determination of the Optimal Cutoff Values for Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire Scores and the Oswestry Disability Index for Favorable Surgical Outcomes in Subjects With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Park JW; Kang KT; Chang BS; Lee CK; Kang SS; Yeom JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Oct; 40(20):E1110-6. PubMed ID: 26076437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization.
    Schmidt S; Franke J; Rauschmann M; Adelt D; Bonsanto MM; Sola S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Apr; 28(4):406-415. PubMed ID: 29372860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Obese people benefit from lumbar spinal stenosis surgery as much as people of normal weight.
    Myllykangas H; Ristolainen L; Hurri H; Lohikoski J; Kautiainen H; Puisto V; Österman H; Manninen M
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Sep; 16(1):550. PubMed ID: 34488826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of pain sensitivity on surgical outcomes after lumbar spine surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kim HJ; Lee JI; Kang KT; Chang BS; Lee CK; Ruscheweyh R; Kang SS; Yeom JS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Feb; 40(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 25384051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Posterolateral fusion combined with posterior decompression shows superiority in the treatment of severe lumbar spinal stenosis without lumbar disc protrusion or prolapse: a retrospective cohort study.
    Wang C; Yin X; Zhang L; Xue X; Xiang Y; Jin H; Liu M; Zhao J
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Jan; 15(1):26. PubMed ID: 31969171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The sagittal spinal profile type: a principal precondition for surgical decision making in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Franke J; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 28862573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decompression surgery improves gait quality in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Loske S; Nüesch C; Byrnes KS; Fiebig O; Schären S; Mündermann A; Netzer C
    Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2195-2204. PubMed ID: 29709554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bilateral versus unilateral interlaminar approach for bilateral decompression in patients with single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a multicenter retrospective study of 175 patients on postoperative pain, functional disability, and patient satisfaction.
    den Boogert HF; Keers JC; Marinus Oterdoom DL; Kuijlen JM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Sep; 23(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 26091439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative predictors for good postoperative satisfaction and functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery--a prospective observational study with a two-year follow-up.
    Aalto T; Sinikallio S; Kröger H; Viinamäki H; Herno A; Leinonen V; Turunen V; Savolainen S; Airaksinen O
    Scand J Surg; 2012; 101(4):255-60. PubMed ID: 23238500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic factors for surgical outcomes including preoperative total knee replacement and knee osteoarthritis status in female patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ho Lee B; Kim TH; Chong HS; Lee SH; Park JO; Kim HS; Shim DW; Lee HM; Moon SH
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Mar; 28(2):47-52. PubMed ID: 23563328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.