1371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32209449)
1. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study.
Hofman MS; Lawrentschuk N; Francis RJ; Tang C; Vela I; Thomas P; Rutherford N; Martin JM; Frydenberg M; Shakher R; Wong LM; Taubman K; Ting Lee S; Hsiao E; Roach P; Nottage M; Kirkwood I; Hayne D; Link E; Marusic P; Matera A; Herschtal A; Iravani A; Hicks RJ; Williams S; Murphy DG;
Lancet; 2020 Apr; 395(10231):1208-1216. PubMed ID: 32209449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A prospective randomized multicentre study of the impact of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT imaging for staging high-risk prostate cancer prior to curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA study): clinical trial protocol.
Hofman MS; Murphy DG; Williams SG; Nzenza T; Herschtal A; Lourenco RA; Bailey DL; Budd R; Hicks RJ; Francis RJ; Lawrentschuk N
BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):783-793. PubMed ID: 29726071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3.
Dyrberg E; Hendel HW; Huynh THV; Klausen TW; Løgager VB; Madsen C; Pedersen EM; Pedersen M; Thomsen HS
Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1221-1230. PubMed ID: 30132104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4.
von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Prospective Comparison of
Anttinen M; Ettala O; Malaspina S; Jambor I; Sandell M; Kajander S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Schildt J; Saukko E; Rautio P; Timonen KL; Matikainen T; Noponen T; Saunavaara J; Löyttyniemi E; Taimen P; Kemppainen J; Dean PB; Blanco Sequeiros R; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M; Boström PJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical impact of PSMA PET/CT in primary prostate cancer compared to conventional nodal and distant staging: a retrospective single center study.
Donswijk ML; van Leeuwen PJ; Vegt E; Cheung Z; Heijmink SWTPJ; van der Poel HG; Stokkel MPM
BMC Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(1):723. PubMed ID: 32758168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Cost-effective in Prostate Cancer: An Analysis Informed by the proPSMA Trial.
de Feria Cardet RE; Hofman MS; Segard T; Yim J; Williams S; Francis RJ; Frydenberg M; Lawrentschuk N; Murphy DG; De Abreu Lourenco R
Eur Urol; 2021 Mar; 79(3):413-418. PubMed ID: 33341285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic Accuracy of
Cantiello F; Gangemi V; Cascini GL; Calabria F; Moschini M; Ferro M; Musi G; Butticè S; Salonia A; Briganti A; Damiano R
Urology; 2017 Aug; 106():139-145. PubMed ID: 28438628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between pelvic PSMA-PET/MR and whole-body PSMA-PET/CT for the initial evaluation of prostate cancer: a proof of concept study.
Domachevsky L; Bernstine H; Goldberg N; Nidam M; Catalano OA; Groshar D
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):328-336. PubMed ID: 31332559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Establishment and prospective validation of an SUV
Jiao J; Kang F; Zhang J; Quan Z; Wen W; Zhao X; Ma S; Wu P; Yang F; Guo W; Yang X; Yuan J; Shi Y; Wang J; Qin W
Theranostics; 2021; 11(17):8396-8411. PubMed ID: 34373749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for Pelvic Nodal Metastasis Detection Prior to Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Multicenter Prospective Phase 3 Imaging Trial.
Hope TA; Eiber M; Armstrong WR; Juarez R; Murthy V; Lawhn-Heath C; Behr SC; Zhang L; Barbato F; Ceci F; Farolfi A; Schwarzenböck SM; Unterrainer M; Zacho HD; Nguyen HG; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR; Reiter RE; Holden S; Herrmann K; Zhu S; Fendler WP; Czernin J; Calais J
JAMA Oncol; 2021 Nov; 7(11):1635-1642. PubMed ID: 34529005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying the Best Candidates for Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography as the Primary Staging Approach Among Men with High-risk Prostate Cancer and Negative Conventional Imaging.
Ma TM; Gafita A; Shabsovich D; Juarez J; Grogan TR; Thin P; Armstrong W; Sonni I; Nguyen K; Lok V; Reiter RE; Rettig MB; Steinberg ML; Kupelian PA; Yang DD; Muralidhar V; Chu C; Feng F; Savjani R; Deng J; Parikh NR; Nickols NG; Elashoff D; Czernin J; Calais J; Kishan AU
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 5(1):100-103. PubMed ID: 33602654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Protocol for the PRIMARY clinical trial, a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional study of the additive diagnostic value of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography/computed tomography to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic setting for men being investigated for prostate cancer.
Amin A; Blazevski A; Thompson J; Scheltema MJ; Hofman MS; Murphy D; Lawrentschuk N; Sathianathen N; Kapoor J; Woo HH; Chalasani V; Rasiah K; van Leeuwen PJ; Tang R; Cusick T; Stricker P; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):515-524. PubMed ID: 31957122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and
Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard.
Stabile A; Pellegrino A; Mazzone E; Cannoletta D; de Angelis M; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; Raggi D; Necchi A; Karakiewicz P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 5(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 34538770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Accuracy of Ga-68-HBED-CC-PSMA-Ligand-PET/CT before Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Recurrent Prostate Cancer.
Jilg CA; Drendel V; Rischke HC; Beck T; Vach W; Schaal K; Wetterauer U; Schultze-Seemann W; Meyer PT
Theranostics; 2017; 7(6):1770-1780. PubMed ID: 28529650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective evaluation of 68Gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography for preoperative lymph node staging in prostate cancer.
van Leeuwen PJ; Emmett L; Ho B; Delprado W; Ting F; Nguyen Q; Stricker PD
BJU Int; 2017 Feb; 119(2):209-215. PubMed ID: 27207581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
Herlemann A; Wenter V; Kretschmer A; Thierfelder KM; Bartenstein P; Faber C; Gildehaus FJ; Stief CG; Gratzke C; Fendler WP
Eur Urol; 2016 Oct; 70(4):553-557. PubMed ID: 26810345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lymph Node Involvement in Treatment-Naïve Prostate Cancer Patients: Correlation of PSMA PET/CT Imaging and Roach Formula in 280 Men in Radiotherapeutic Management.
Koerber SA; Stach G; Kratochwil C; Haefner MF; Rathke H; Herfarth K; Kopka K; Holland-Letz T; Choyke PL; Haberkorn U; Debus J; Giesel FL
J Nucl Med; 2020 Jan; 61(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 31302638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
