265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32209629)
1. Does Gleason score of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy affect biochemical recurrence and oncological outcomes? Protocol for systematic review.
John A; O'Callaghan M; Catterwell R; Selth L
BMJ Open; 2020 Mar; 10(3):e034612. PubMed ID: 32209629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Primary Gleason grade and Gleason grade group at positive surgical margins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
John A; John H; Catterwell R; Selth LA; Callaghan MO
BJU Int; 2021 May; 127 Suppl 1():13-22. PubMed ID: 33973331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic Value of Gleason Score at Positive Surgical Margin in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Lysenko I; Mori K; Mostafaei H; Enikeev DV; Karakiewicz PI; Briganti A; Quhal F; Janisch F; Shariat SF
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2020 Oct; 18(5):e517-e522. PubMed ID: 32229268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence in patients with pT3aN0/Nx prostate cancer with positive surgical margins: a multicenter study from the Prostate Cancer Research Committee.
Song W; Lee DH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Lee HM; Choi HY; Kim JW; Lee S; Byun SS; Jeong CW; Kwak C; Cho JS; Ahn H; Jeon SS
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Nov; 143(11):2393-2400. PubMed ID: 28823006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Similar Recurrence Rate Between Gleason Score of Six at Positive Margin and Negative Margin After Radical Prostatectomy.
Kano H; Kadono Y; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Iijima M; Kawaguchi S; Nohara T; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Ikeda H; Mizokami A
Anticancer Res; 2021 Jan; 41(1):509-516. PubMed ID: 33419850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Length of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: Does size matter? - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
John A; Lim A; Catterwell R; Selth L; O'Callaghan M
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2023 Dec; 26(4):673-680. PubMed ID: 36859711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre.
Sachdeva A; Veeratterapillay R; Voysey A; Kelly K; Johnson MI; Aning J; Soomro NA
BMC Urol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):91. PubMed ID: 28969608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy.
Evren I; Hacıislamoğlu A; Ekşi M; Yavuzsan AH; Baytekin F; Çolakoğlu Y; Canoğlu D; Tugcu V
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 30325603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of surgical margin status on the survival outcome after surgical resection of gastric cancer: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jiang Z; Cai Z; Yin Y; Shen C; Huang J; Yin Y; Zhang B
BMJ Open; 2020 Nov; 10(11):e040282. PubMed ID: 33148760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Comprehensive Analysis of the Association Between Gleason Score at a Positive Surgical Margin and the Risk of Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.
Iremashvili V; Pelaez L; Jorda M; Parekh DJ; Punnen S
Am J Surg Pathol; 2019 Mar; 43(3):369-373. PubMed ID: 30557174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Positive Surgical Margins After Bladder Neck Sparing Radical Prostatectomy.
Bellangino M; Verrill C; Leslie T; Bell RW; Hamdy FC; Lamb AD
Curr Urol Rep; 2017 Nov; 18(12):99. PubMed ID: 29116405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Positive surgical margin is associated with biochemical recurrence risk following radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis from high-quality retrospective cohort studies.
Zhang L; Wu B; Zha Z; Zhao H; Jiang Y; Yuan J
World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 16(1):124. PubMed ID: 29970100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraoperative Frozen Section for Margin Evaluation During Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review.
Dinneen EP; Van Der Slot M; Adasonla K; Tan J; Grierson J; Haider A; Freeman A; Oakley N; Shaw G
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Jul; 6(4):664-673. PubMed ID: 31787570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Chapin BF; Nguyen JN; Achim MF; Navai N; Williams SB; Prokhorova IN; Wang X; Tapia EMLN; Davis JW; Troncoso P
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Jun; 21(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 29230008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interrupted versus continuous suturing for vesicourethral anastomosis during radical prostatectomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kowalewski KF; Tapking C; Hetjens S; Nickel F; Mandel P; Ritter M; Kriegmair MC
BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e019823. PubMed ID: 29175892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on oncologic outcomes in patients with nonorgan-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Heinze A; S Abrams-Pompe R; Budäus L; Chun FK; Graefen M; Huland H; Tilki D
Prostate; 2022 Jun; 82(9):949-956. PubMed ID: 35344221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical method influences specimen margins and biochemical recurrence during radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Srougi V; Bessa J; Baghdadi M; Nunes-Silva I; da Costa JB; Garcia-Barreras S; Barret E; Rozet F; Galiano M; Sanchez-Salas R; Cathelineau X
World J Urol; 2017 Oct; 35(10):1481-1488. PubMed ID: 28243789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
