BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32211837)

  • 1. A Framework for Advancing Precision Medicine in Clinical Trials for Mental Disorders.
    Lenze EJ; Rodebaugh TL; Nicol GE
    JAMA Psychiatry; 2020 Jul; 77(7):663-664. PubMed ID: 32211837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Precision clinical trials: a framework for getting to precision medicine for neurobehavioural disorders.
    Lenze EJ; Nicol GE; Barbour DL; Kannampallil T; Wong AWK; Piccirillo J; Drysdale AT; Sylvester CM; Haddad R; Miller JP; Low CA; Lenze SN; Freedland KE; Rodebaugh TL
    J Psychiatry Neurosci; 2021 Jan; 46(1):E97-E110. PubMed ID: 33206039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical pitfalls of personalized medicine.
    Senn S
    Nature; 2018 Nov; 563(7733):619-621. PubMed ID: 30482931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A response to Wasan editorial "Spinal cord stimulation in a workers' compensation population: how difficult it can be to interpret a clinical trial": stimulating discussion.
    Turner JA; Hollingworth W; Comstock BA; Deyo RA
    Pain; 2010 May; 149(2):406-407. PubMed ID: 20207083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical effectiveness: an approach to clinical trial design more relevant to clinical practice, acknowledging the importance of individual differences.
    Moore RA; Derry S; McQuay HJ; Straube S; Aldington D; Wiffen P; Bell RF; Kalso E; Rowbotham MC;
    Pain; 2010 May; 149(2):173-176. PubMed ID: 19748185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Community-driven development of a modified progression-free survival ratio for precision oncology.
    Mock A; Heilig CE; Kreutzfeldt S; Huebschmann D; Heining C; Schröck E; Brors B; Stenzinger A; Jäger D; Schlenk R; Glimm H; Fröhling S; Horak P;
    ESMO Open; 2019; 4(6):e000583. PubMed ID: 31798980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developing patient-reported outcome measures for pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.
    Turk DC; Dworkin RH; Burke LB; Gershon R; Rothman M; Scott J; Allen RR; Atkinson HJ; Chandler J; Cleeland C; Cowan P; Dimitrova R; Dionne R; Farrar JT; Haythornthwaite JA; Hertz S; Jadad AR; Jensen MP; Kellstein D; Kerns RD; Manning DC; Martin S; Max MB; McDermott MP; McGrath P; Moulin DE; Nurmikko T; Quessy S; Raja S; Rappaport BA; Rauschkolb C; Robinson JP; Royal MA; Simon L; Stauffer JW; Stucki G; Tollett J; von Stein T; Wallace MS; Wernicke J; White RE; Williams AC; Witter J; Wyrwich KW
    Pain; 2006 Dec; 125(3):208-215. PubMed ID: 17069973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What works for whom, when and how?
    Seers K
    Pain; 2009 Jun; 143(3):167-168. PubMed ID: 19339114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reply to Drs. Olanow and Rascol.
    Ahlskog JE; Uitti RJ
    Neurology; 2010 Apr; 74(14):1151. PubMed ID: 20368636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cut-points for the measurement of pain: the choice depends on what you want to study.
    Farrar JT
    Pain; 2010 May; 149(2):163-164. PubMed ID: 20347224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chronic low back pain analgesic studies--a methodological minefield.
    Moore AR; Straube S; Derry S; McQuay HJ
    Pain; 2010 Jun; 149(3):431-434. PubMed ID: 20304558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical trials are only as good as the patient- important outcome measures assessed.
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Sep; 125():A7-A9. PubMed ID: 32862954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time to change the primary outcome of lupus trials.
    Houssiau FA
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2019 May; 78(5):581-582. PubMed ID: 29921574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Moving Beyond Medications That Act at the μ Receptor in the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.
    Strain EC; Kampman KM; Weiss RD
    JAMA Psychiatry; 2021 Jul; 78(7):701-702. PubMed ID: 33851964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal Individualized Treatments in Resource-Limited Settings.
    Luedtke AR; van der Laan MJ
    Int J Biostat; 2016 May; 12(1):283-303. PubMed ID: 27227725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical research in critical care. Difficulties and perspectives.
    Latour-Pérez J
    Med Intensiva (Engl Ed); 2018 Apr; 42(3):184-195. PubMed ID: 28943024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hitting the target: a new framework for mental health trials.
    Lancet; 2014 Mar; 383(9921):928. PubMed ID: 24629280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: problems, solutions, and recommendations.
    Hobart JC; Cano SJ; Zajicek JP; Thompson AJ
    Lancet Neurol; 2007 Dec; 6(12):1094-105. PubMed ID: 18031706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New clinical trial designs in the era of precision medicine: An overview of definitions, strengths, weaknesses, and current use in oncology.
    Janiaud P; Serghiou S; Ioannidis JPA
    Cancer Treat Rev; 2019 Feb; 73():20-30. PubMed ID: 30572165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rethinking Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine with Placebogenomics and Placebo Dose.
    Özdemir V; Endrenyi L
    OMICS; 2021 Jan; 25(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 33305994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.