326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32212014)
1. Performance of three prognostic models in critically ill patients with cancer: a prospective study.
Martos-Benítez FD; Larrondo-Muguercia H; León-Pérez D; Rivero-López JC; Orama-Requejo V; Martínez-Alfonso JL
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jul; 25(7):1242-1249. PubMed ID: 32212014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of four prognostic scores in patients with cancer admitted to Brazilian intensive care units: results from a prospective multicenter study.
Soares M; Silva UV; Teles JM; Silva E; Caruso P; Lobo SM; Dal Pizzol F; Azevedo LP; de Carvalho FB; Salluh JI
Intensive Care Med; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1188-95. PubMed ID: 20221751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. APACHE II score for critically ill patients with a solid tumor: A reclassification study.
Martos-Benítez FD; Cordero-Escobar I; Soto-García A; Betancourt-Plaza I; González-Martínez I
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed); 2018 Oct; 65(8):447-455. PubMed ID: 29779786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of three prognostic models in patients with cancer in need of intensive care in a medical center in China.
Xing X; Gao Y; Wang H; Huang C; Qu S; Zhang H; Wang H; Sun K
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131329. PubMed ID: 26110534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility of transitioning from APACHE II to SAPS III as prognostic model in a Brazilian general intensive care unit. A retrospective study.
Serpa Neto A; Assunção MS; Pardini A; Silva E
Sao Paulo Med J; 2015; 133(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 25337664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 In Predicting Hospital Mortality In Emergency Intensive Care Unit.
Ma QB; Fu YW; Feng L; Zhai QR; Liang Y; Wu M; Zheng YA
Chin Med J (Engl); 2017 Jul; 130(13):1544-1551. PubMed ID: 28639569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The performance of customised APACHE II and SAPS II in predicting mortality of mixed critically ill patients in a Thai medical intensive care unit.
Khwannimit B; Bhurayanontachai R
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2009 Sep; 37(5):784-90. PubMed ID: 19775043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Simplified prognostic model for critically ill patients in resource limited settings in South Asia.
Haniffa R; Mukaka M; Munasinghe SB; De Silva AP; Jayasinghe KSA; Beane A; de Keizer N; Dondorp AM
Crit Care; 2017 Oct; 21(1):250. PubMed ID: 29041985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of a prognostic score for mortality in elderly patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit.
Sánchez-Hurtado LA; Ángeles-Veléz A; Tejeda-Huezo BC; García-Cruz JC; Juárez-Cedillo T
Indian J Crit Care Med; 2016 Dec; 20(12):695-700. PubMed ID: 28149026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of two outcome prediction models on an independent database.
Moreno R; Miranda DR; Fidler V; Van Schilfgaarde R
Crit Care Med; 1998 Jan; 26(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 9428543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcome prediction in intensive care: results of a prospective, multicentre, Portuguese study.
Moreno R; Morais P
Intensive Care Med; 1997 Feb; 23(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 9069003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of six mortality prediction models in patients admitted with severe sepsis and septic shock to the intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study.
Arabi Y; Al Shirawi N; Memish Z; Venkatesh S; Al-Shimemeri A
Crit Care; 2003 Oct; 7(5):R116-22. PubMed ID: 12974979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is the SAPS II score valid in surgical intensive care unit patients?
Sakr Y; Marques J; Mortsch S; Gonsalves MD; Hekmat K; Kabisch B; Kohl M; Reinhart K
J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Apr; 18(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 20860597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of APACHE II and SAPS II scoring systems in predicting hospital mortality in Thai adult intensive care units.
Khwannimit B; Geater A
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Apr; 90(4):643-52. PubMed ID: 17487117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of the third-generation models of severity scoring systems (APACHE IV, SAPS 3 and MPM-III) in acute kidney injury critically ill patients.
Costa e Silva VT; de Castro I; Liaño F; Muriel A; Rodríguez-Palomares JR; Yu L
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2011 Dec; 26(12):3894-901. PubMed ID: 21505093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of outcome from intensive care: a prospective cohort study comparing Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and III prognostic systems in a United Kingdom intensive care unit.
Beck DH; Taylor BL; Millar B; Smith GB
Crit Care Med; 1997 Jan; 25(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 8989170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the performance of five intensive care scoring models within a large Scottish database.
Livingston BM; MacKirdy FN; Howie JC; Jones R; Norrie JD
Crit Care Med; 2000 Jun; 28(6):1820-7. PubMed ID: 10890627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the performance of SAPS II, SAPS 3, APACHE II, and their customized prognostic models in a surgical intensive care unit.
Sakr Y; Krauss C; Amaral AC; Réa-Neto A; Specht M; Reinhart K; Marx G
Br J Anaesth; 2008 Dec; 101(6):798-803. PubMed ID: 18845649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. External validation of the SAPS II, APACHE II and APACHE III prognostic models in South England: a multicentre study.
Beck DH; Smith GB; Pappachan JV; Millar B
Intensive Care Med; 2003 Feb; 29(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 12536271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of acute physiology and chronic health evaluations II and III and simplified acute physiology score II: a prospective cohort study evaluating these methods to predict outcome in a German interdisciplinary intensive care unit.
Markgraf R; Deutschinoff G; Pientka L; Scholten T
Crit Care Med; 2000 Jan; 28(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 10667495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
