These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32213149)

  • 1. Serial Recall Predicts Vocoded Sentence Recognition Across Spectral Resolutions.
    Bosen AK; Barry MF
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Apr; 63(4):1282-1298. PubMed ID: 32213149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spectral-Temporal Trade-Off in Vocoded Sentence Recognition: Effects of Age, Hearing Thresholds, and Working Memory.
    Shader MJ; Yancey CM; Gordon-Salant S; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1226-1235. PubMed ID: 32032222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Sequential Sentence Paradigm Using Revised PRESTO Sentence Lists.
    Plotkowski AR; Alexander JM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Sep; 27(8):647-60. PubMed ID: 27564442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How Does Nonverbal Reasoning Affect Sentence Recognition in Adults with Cochlear Implants and Normal-Hearing Peers?
    Moberly AC; Mattingly JK; Castellanos I
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(3):127-138. PubMed ID: 31266013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forward Digit Span and Word Familiarity Do Not Correlate With Differences in Speech Recognition in Individuals With Cochlear Implants After Accounting for Auditory Resolution.
    Bosen AK; Sevich VA; Cannon SA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Aug; 64(8):3330-3342. PubMed ID: 34251908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interactions Between Item Set and Vocoding in Serial Recall.
    Bosen AK; Luckasen MC
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1404-1417. PubMed ID: 31033634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.
    Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):616-34. PubMed ID: 24047949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. High- and Low-Performing Adult Cochlear Implant Users on High-Variability Sentence Recognition: Differences in Auditory Spectral Resolution and Neurocognitive Functioning.
    Tamati TN; Ray C; Vasil KJ; Pisoni DB; Moberly AC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 May; 31(5):324-335. PubMed ID: 31580802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. List Equivalency of PRESTO for the Evaluation of Speech Recognition.
    Faulkner KF; Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):582-94. PubMed ID: 26134725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
    Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.
    Hunter CR; Pisoni DB
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 28945658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.
    Loebach JL; Pisoni DB; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 19773659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development, reliability, and validity of PRESTO: a new high-variability sentence recognition test.
    Gilbert JL; Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 23231814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Memory Span for Spoken Digits in Adults With Cochlear Implants or Typical Hearing: Effects of Age and Identification Ability.
    Cleary M; Wilkinson T; Wilson L; Goupell MJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 61(8):2099-2114. PubMed ID: 30073267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech Recognition in Adults With Cochlear Implants: The Effects of Working Memory, Phonological Sensitivity, and Aging.
    Moberly AC; Harris MS; Boyce L; Nittrouer S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Apr; 60(4):1046-1061. PubMed ID: 28384805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noise-Vocoded Sentence Recognition and the Use of Context in Older and Younger Adult Listeners.
    Moberly AC; Varadarajan VV; Tamati TN
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Jan; 66(1):365-381. PubMed ID: 36475738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech Understanding With Various Maskers in Cochlear-Implant and Simulated Cochlear-Implant Hearing: Effects of Spectral Resolution and Implications for Masking Release.
    Croghan NBH; Smith ZM
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518787276. PubMed ID: 30022730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Impact of Neurocognitive Skills on Recognition of Spectrally Degraded Sentences.
    Lewis JH; Castellanos I; Moberly AC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Sep; 32(8):528-536. PubMed ID: 34965599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.
    Oh SH; Donaldson GS; Kong YY
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 27007220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.