150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32213791)
21. Variations induced by body weight and background lesion normalization in standardized uptake value estimated by F18-FDG PET/CT.
Badawe EM; Abdel Gawad H; El-Nagdy MS; Khalil MM
Eur J Hybrid Imaging; 2022 Oct; 6(1):22. PubMed ID: 36224438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Correlation analysis between the quantitative parameters of iodine-131 single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography thyroid bed uptake and the efficacy of radioactive iodine adjuvant therapy for papillary thyroid cancer.
Mao Y; Lin R; Wang Y; Yu J
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2024 May; 14(5):3665-3675. PubMed ID: 38720856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of standardized uptake values in normal structures between PET/CT and PET/MRI in an oncology patient population.
Kershah S; Partovi S; Traughber BJ; Muzic RF; Schluchter MD; O'Donnell JK; Faulhaber P
Mol Imaging Biol; 2013 Dec; 15(6):776-85. PubMed ID: 23632951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Application of
Xu T; Zeng Y; Yang X; Liu G; Lv T; Yang H; Jiang F; Chen Y
Bone Joint Res; 2022 Jun; 11(6):398-408. PubMed ID: 35731211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of bone metastasis burden as an imaging biomarker by quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography for assessing prostate cancer with bone metastasis: a phantom and clinical study.
Motegi K; Matsutomo N; Yamamoto T; Koizumi M
Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Sep; 13(3):219-229. PubMed ID: 32535819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Correlation between standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient of neoplastic lesions evaluated with whole-body simultaneous hybrid PET/MRI.
Rakheja R; Chandarana H; DeMello L; Jackson K; Geppert C; Faul D; Glielmi C; Friedman KP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1115-9. PubMed ID: 24147485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Absolute Quantitation of Cardiac
Dorbala S; Park MA; Cuddy S; Singh V; Sullivan K; Kim S; Falk RH; Taqueti VR; Skali H; Blankstein R; Bay C; Kijewski MF; Di Carli MF
J Nucl Med; 2021 May; 62(5):716-722. PubMed ID: 32887756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Physiological uptake of 18F-FDG in the vertebral bone marrow in healthy adults on PET/CT imaging.
Shen G; Liang M; Su M; Kuang A
Acta Radiol; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1487-1493. PubMed ID: 29486597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Quantitative bone single-photon emission computed tomography imaging for uninfected nonunion: comparison of hypertrophic nonunion and non-hypertrophic nonunion.
Oe K; Zeng F; Fukui T; Nogami M; Murakami T; Matsumoto T; Kuroda R; Niikura T
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Feb; 16(1):125. PubMed ID: 33568159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Improvement of Standardized Uptake Value Accuracy in the
Nakamura Y; Kangai Y; Abe T; Nakahara Y
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(9):921-931. PubMed ID: 34544916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues.
Pace L; Nicolai E; Luongo A; Aiello M; Catalano OA; Soricelli A; Salvatore M
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):289-96. PubMed ID: 24331845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Utility of FDG PET/CT in the Characterization of Sinonasal Neoplasms: Analysis of Standardized Uptake Value Parameters.
Ozturk K; Gencturk M; Caicedo-Granados E; Li F; Cayci Z
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Dec; 211(6):1354-1360. PubMed ID: 30300005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Quantitative assessment of
Oya T; Ichikawa Y; Nakamura S; Tomita Y; Sasaki T; Inoue T; Sakuma H
Ann Nucl Med; 2023 Jun; 37(6):360-370. PubMed ID: 36947324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of standardized uptake values between
Arvola S; Jambor I; Kuisma A; Kemppainen J; Kajander S; Seppänen M; Noponen T
EJNMMI Res; 2019 Jan; 9(1):6. PubMed ID: 30680469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Standardized uptake values for [¹⁸F] FDG in normal organ tissues: comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI.
Heusch P; Buchbender C; Beiderwellen K; Nensa F; Hartung-Knemeyer V; Lauenstein TC; Bockisch A; Forsting M; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):870-6. PubMed ID: 23394765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Minimum Standardized Uptake Value from Quantitative Bone Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography for Evaluation of Femoral Head Viability in Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture.
Ryoo HG; Lee WW; Kim JY; Kong E; Choi WH; Yoon JK;
Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Aug; 53(4):287-295. PubMed ID: 31456862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Usefulness of quantitative bone SPECT/CT for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in clinical settings.
Moridera K; Kitajima K; Yoshikawa K; Takaoka K; Tsuchitani T; Noguchi K; Kishimoto H; Yamakado K
Jpn J Radiol; 2022 May; 40(5):492-499. PubMed ID: 34851501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Quantitative single photon emission computed tomography derived standardized uptake values on 99mTc-PYP scan in patients with suspected ATTR cardiac amyloidosis.
Avalon JC; Fuqua J; Deskins S; Miller T; Conte J; Martin D; Marano G; Yanamala N; Mills J; Bianco C; Patel B; Seetharam K; Raylman R; Sengupta PP; Hamirani YS
J Nucl Cardiol; 2023 Feb; 30(1):127-139. PubMed ID: 35655113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Standardized Uptake Value Using Thyroid Quantitative SPECT/CT for the Diagnosis and Evaluation of Graves' Disease: A Prospective Multicenter Study.
Dong F; Li L; Bian Y; Li G; Han X; Li M; Liu J; Xue Y; Li Y; Hu Y; Tan J
Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():7589853. PubMed ID: 30834273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Semiquantitative Assessment of
Minamimoto R; Xu G; Jamali M; Holley D; Barkhodari A; Zaharchuk G; Iagaru A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):1136-1142. PubMed ID: 28777652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
