These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32214261)

  • 1. The pros and cons of screening.
    Gilbert N
    Nature; 2020 Mar; 579(7800):S2-S4. PubMed ID: 32214261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Parental impressions of the benefits (pros) and barriers (cons) of follow-up care after an acute emergency department visit for children with asthma.
    Smith SR; Highstein GR; Jaffe DM; Fisher EB; Strunk RC
    Pediatrics; 2002 Aug; 110(2 Pt 1):323-30. PubMed ID: 12165585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pros and cons: prospective predictors of marijuana use on a college campus.
    Elliott JC; Carey KB
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2013 Mar; 27(1):230-5. PubMed ID: 22985053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying Subgroups among Hardcore Smokers: a Latent Profile Approach.
    Bommelé J; Kleinjan M; Schoenmakers TM; Burk WJ; van den Eijnden R; van de Mheen D
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0133570. PubMed ID: 26207829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictors of Change in Physical Activity and Fruit and Vegetable Intake in a Multiethnic Population in Hawaii at 6 and 12 Months Follow-up.
    Galloway JC; Nigg CR; Liu M; Banna JC
    Int J Appl Psychol; 2015; 5(2):45-53. PubMed ID: 27525198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pros and cons of prognostic disclosure to Japanese cancer patients and their families from the family's point of view.
    Yoshida S; Shiozaki M; Sanjo M; Morita T; Hirai K; Tsuneto S; Shima Y
    J Palliat Med; 2012 Dec; 15(12):1342-9. PubMed ID: 23151232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action.
    Liberman N; Eyal T; Trope Y; Walther E
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Jun; 86(6):781-95. PubMed ID: 15149255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motivation for change and the pros and cons of smoking in a Spanish population.
    Font-Mayolas S; Planes M; Gras MA; Sullman MJ
    Addict Behav; 2007 Jan; 32(1):175-80. PubMed ID: 16647213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Associations between the stages of change and the pros and cons of smoking in a longitudinal study of Swiss smokers.
    Etter JF; Perneger TV
    Addict Behav; 1999; 24(3):419-24. PubMed ID: 10400280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors associated with perceptions of, and decisional balance for, condom use with main partner among women at risk for HIV infection.
    Semaan S; Lauby J; O'Connell AA; Cohen A
    Women Health; 2003; 37(3):53-69. PubMed ID: 12839307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Self-efficacy, pros, and cons as variables associated with adjacent stages of change for regular exercise in Japanese college students.
    Horiuchi S; Tsuda A; Kobayashi H; Fallon EA; Sakano Y
    J Health Psychol; 2017 Jul; 22(8):993-1003. PubMed ID: 26786174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The pros and cons of vision screening.
    Davis H
    Occup Health (Lond); 1994 Mar; 46(3):84, 86-8. PubMed ID: 8028835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening for urologic malignancies in primary care: pros, cons, and recommendations.
    Stephenson AJ; Kuritzky L; Campbell SC
    Cleve Clin J Med; 2007 May; 74 Suppl 3():S6-14. PubMed ID: 17546828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cancer screening - pros, cons, choice, and the patient.
    Trevena L
    Aust Fam Physician; 2009 Apr; 38(4):188-92. PubMed ID: 19350066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pros and cons for breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis - a review of the literature.
    Kleinknecht JH; Ciurea AI; Ciortea CA
    Med Pharm Rep; 2020 Oct; 93(4):335-341. PubMed ID: 33225258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to Integrate Personalized Medicine into Prevention? Recommendations from the Personalized Prevention of Chronic Diseases (PRECeDI) Consortium.
    Boccia S; Pastorino R; Ricciardi W; Ádány R; Barnhoorn F; Boffetta P; Cornel MC; De Vito C; Gray M; Jani A; Lang M; Roldan J; Rosso A; Sánchez JM; Van Dujin CM; Van El CG; Villari P; Zawati MH
    Public Health Genomics; 2019; 22(5-6):208-214. PubMed ID: 31805565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Weighing the Pros and Cons of Using Alcohol Protective Behavioral Strategies: A Qualitative Examination among College Students.
    Bravo AJ; Pearson MR; Stevens LE; Henson JM
    Subst Use Misuse; 2018 Nov; 53(13):2190-2198. PubMed ID: 29708460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confirmatory analysis of opinions regarding the pros and cons of mammography.
    Rakowski W; Andersen MR; Stoddard AM; Urban N; Rimer BK; Lane DS; Fox SA; Costanza ME
    Health Psychol; 1997 Sep; 16(5):433-41. PubMed ID: 9302540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pros and cons of healthcare information technology implementation: the pros win.
    Maffei R
    JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul; 2006; 8(4):116-20; quiz 121-2. PubMed ID: 17149039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting stages of adoption of mammography screening in a general population.
    Chamot E; Charvet AI; Perneger TV
    Eur J Cancer; 2001 Oct; 37(15):1869-77. PubMed ID: 11576843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.