These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32214874)

  • 1. Assessing the Certainty of Locations Produced by an Address Geocoding System.
    Davis CA; Fonseca FT
    Geoinformatica; 2007; 11(1):103-129. PubMed ID: 32214874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Positional accuracy of geocoding from residential postal codes versus full street addresses.
    Khan S; Pinault L; Tjepkema M; Wilkins R
    Health Rep; 2018 Feb; 29(2):3-9. PubMed ID: 29465738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of two geocoding methods for geographic information system-based exposure assessment in epidemiological studies.
    Faure E; Danjou AM; Clavel-Chapelon F; Boutron-Ruault MC; Dossus L; Fervers B
    Environ Health; 2017 Feb; 16(1):15. PubMed ID: 28235407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving geocoding matching rates of structured addresses in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
    Cortes TR; Silveira IHD; Junger WL
    Cad Saude Publica; 2021; 37(7):e00039321. PubMed ID: 34346979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Who Hits the Mark? A Comparative Study of the Free Geocoding Services of Google and OpenStreetMap].
    Lemke D; Mattauch V; Heidinger O; Hense HW
    Gesundheitswesen; 2015 Sep; 77(8-9):e160-5. PubMed ID: 26154258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Positional error in automated geocoding of residential addresses.
    Cayo MR; Talbot TO
    Int J Health Geogr; 2003 Dec; 2(1):10. PubMed ID: 14687425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Geocoding addresses from a large population-based study: lessons learned.
    McElroy JA; Remington PL; Trentham-Dietz A; Robert SA; Newcomb PA
    Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 12843762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved Geocoding of Cancer Registry Addresses in Urban and Rural Oklahoma.
    Dilekli N; Janitz A; Campbell J
    J Registry Manag; 2020; 47(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 32833379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Geocoding rural addresses in a community contaminated by PFOA: a comparison of methods.
    Vieira VM; Howard GJ; Gallagher LG; Fletcher T
    Environ Health; 2010 Apr; 9():18. PubMed ID: 20406495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Geocoding Error, Spatial Uncertainty, and Implications for Exposure Assessment and Environmental Epidemiology.
    Kinnee EJ; Tripathy S; Schinasi L; Shmool JLC; Sheffield PE; Holguin F; Clougherty JE
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(16):. PubMed ID: 32806682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Misclassification errors from postal code-based geocoding to assign census geography in Nova Scotia, Canada.
    Terashima M; Kephart G
    Can J Public Health; 2016 Dec; 107(4-5):e424-e430. PubMed ID: 28026709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing a single-stage geocoding method to a multi-stage geocoding method: how much and where do they disagree?
    Lovasi GS; Weiss JC; Hoskins R; Whitsel EA; Rice K; Erickson CF; Psaty BM
    Int J Health Geogr; 2007 Mar; 6():12. PubMed ID: 17367520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methods for retrospective geocoding in population studies: the Jackson Heart Study.
    Robinson JC; Wyatt SB; Hickson D; Gwinn D; Faruque F; Sims M; Sarpong D; Taylor HA
    J Urban Health; 2010 Jan; 87(1):136-50. PubMed ID: 20187277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of geocoding quality on environmental exposure assessment of children living near high traffic roads.
    Zandbergen PA
    BMC Public Health; 2007 Mar; 7():37. PubMed ID: 17367533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Impacts of geocoding quality in environmental epidemiology studies: two case-studies in Tuscany Region (Central Italy)].
    Nuvolone D; Santini M; Pepe P; Cipriani F
    Epidemiol Prev; 2016; 40(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 26951701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Geocoding one million of addresses using API: a semiautomatic multistep procedure].
    Mataloni F; Bauleo L; Badaloni C; Nobile F; Savastano J; Noccioli F; Salatino CG; Balducci M; Cappai G; Rosa AC; Asta F; Fusco D; Michelozzi P; Davoli M
    Epidemiol Prev; 2022; 46(3):160-167. PubMed ID: 35443573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Match rate and positional accuracy of two geocoding methods for epidemiologic research.
    Zhan FB; Brender JD; De Lima I; Suarez L; Langlois PH
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 16(11):842-9. PubMed ID: 17027286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Positional accuracy of two methods of geocoding.
    Ward MH; Nuckols JR; Giglierano J; Bonner MR; Wolter C; Airola M; Mix W; Colt JS; Hartge P
    Epidemiology; 2005 Jul; 16(4):542-7. PubMed ID: 15951673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Geocoding health data with Geographic Information Systems: a pilot study in northeast Italy for developing a standardized data-acquiring format.
    Baldovin T; Zangrando D; Casale P; Ferrarese F; Bertoncello C; Buja A; Marcolongo A; Baldo V
    J Prev Med Hyg; 2015 Aug; 56(2):E88-94. PubMed ID: 26789994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multifaceted comparison of ArcGIS and MapMarker for automated geocoding.
    Kumar S; Liu M; Hwang SA
    Geospat Health; 2012 Nov; 7(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 23242688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.