These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32214874)

  • 21. Positional accuracy and geographic bias of four methods of geocoding in epidemiologic research.
    Schootman M; Sterling DA; Struthers J; Yan Y; Laboube T; Emo B; Higgs G
    Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 17(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17448683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Smartphone-assisted spatial data collection improves geographic information quality: pilot study using a birth records dataset.
    Xu X; Hu H; Ha S; Han D
    Geospat Health; 2016 Nov; 11(3):482. PubMed ID: 27903063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Improving geocoding practices: evaluation of geocoding tools.
    Yang DH; Bilaver LM; Hayes O; Goerge R
    J Med Syst; 2004 Aug; 28(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 15366241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spatial error in geocoding physician location data from the AMA Physician Masterfile: implications for spatial accessibility analysis.
    McLafferty S; Freeman VL; Barrett RE; Luo L; Shockley A
    Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 3(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 22469489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Positional accuracy of geocoded addresses in epidemiologic research.
    Bonner MR; Han D; Nie J; Rogerson P; Vena JE; Freudenheim JL
    Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):408-12. PubMed ID: 12843763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Investigating impacts of positional error on potential health care accessibility.
    Bell S; Wilson K; Shah TI; Gersher S; Elliott T
    Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 3(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 22469488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of the positional difference between two common geocoding methods.
    Duncan DT; Castro MC; Blossom JC; Bennett GG; Gortmaker SL
    Geospat Health; 2011 May; 5(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 21590677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Development of web-based geocoding applications for the population-based Birth Defects Surveillance System in New York state.
    Wang Y; Le LH; Wang X; Tao Z; Druschel CD; Cross PK; Hwang SA
    J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 20795565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Error propagation models to examine the effects of geocoding quality on spatial analysis of individual-level datasets.
    Zandbergen PA; Hart TC; Lenzer KE; Camponovo ME
    Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 3(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 22469492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Area-Based Geocoding: An Approach to Exposure Assessment Incorporating Positional Uncertainty.
    Thompson LK; Langholz B; Goldberg DW; Wilson JP; Ritz B; Tayour C; Cockburn M
    Geohealth; 2021 Dec; 5(12):e2021GH000430. PubMed ID: 34859166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A multi-stage approach to maximizing geocoding success in a large population-based cohort study through automated and interactive processes.
    Sonderman JS; Mumma MT; Cohen SS; Cope EL; Blot WJ; Signorello LB
    Geospat Health; 2012 May; 6(2):273-84. PubMed ID: 22639129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modeling the probability distribution of positional errors incurred by residential address geocoding.
    Zimmerman DL; Fang X; Mazumdar S; Rushton G
    Int J Health Geogr; 2007 Jan; 6():1. PubMed ID: 17214903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Error and bias in determining exposure potential of children at school locations using proximity-based GIS techniques.
    Zandbergen PA; Green JW
    Environ Health Perspect; 2007 Sep; 115(9):1363-70. PubMed ID: 17805429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Comparison of Google and Yahoo applications for geocoding of postal addresses in epidemiological studies].
    Quesada JA; Nolasco A; Moncho J
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 2013; 87(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 23775108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Geocoding cryptosporidiosis cases in Ireland (2008-2017)-development of a reliable, reproducible, multiphase geocoding methodology.
    Domegan L; Garvey P; McKeown P; Johnson H; Hynds P; O'Dwyer J; ÓhAiseadha C
    Ir J Med Sci; 2021 Nov; 190(4):1497-1507. PubMed ID: 33464478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spatial Errors in Automated Geocoding of Incident Locations in Australian Suicide Mortality Data.
    Torok M; Konings P; Passioura J; Chen NA; Hewett M; Phillips M; Burnett A; Shand F; Christensen H
    Epidemiology; 2021 Nov; 32(6):896-903. PubMed ID: 34310446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improving geocoding outcomes for the Nebraska Cancer Registry: learning from proven practices.
    Lin G; Gray J; Qu M
    J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(2):49-56. PubMed ID: 21086822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Local indicators of geocoding accuracy (LIGA): theory and application.
    Jacquez GM; Rommel R
    Int J Health Geogr; 2009 Oct; 8():60. PubMed ID: 19863795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Decentralized and reproducible geocoding and characterization of community and environmental exposures for multisite studies.
    Brokamp C; Wolfe C; Lingren T; Harley J; Ryan P
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Mar; 25(3):309-314. PubMed ID: 29126118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A research agenda: does geocoding positional error matter in health GIS studies?
    Jacquez GM
    Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 3(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 22469487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.