152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32215714)
1. OssDsign cranioplasty in children: a single-centre experience.
Henderson D; Sinha S
Childs Nerv Syst; 2020 Aug; 36(8):1773-1776. PubMed ID: 32215714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cranioplasty outcomes and associated complications: A single-centre observational study.
Liang ES; Tipper G; Hunt L; Gan PY
Br J Neurosurg; 2016; 30(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 26328774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Titanium mesh cranioplasty in pediatric patients after decompressive craniectomy: Appropriate timing for pre-schoolers and early school age children.
Sheng HS; Shen F; Zhang N; Lin FC; Li DD; Cai M; Jiang GQ; Lin J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 47(7):1096-1103. PubMed ID: 31088762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cranioplasty with custom-made titanium plates--14 years experience.
Wiggins A; Austerberry R; Morrison D; Ho KM; Honeybul S
Neurosurgery; 2013 Feb; 72(2):248-56; discussion 256. PubMed ID: 23149967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Complications of titanium cranioplasty--a retrospective analysis of 174 patients.
Mukherjee S; Thakur B; Haq I; Hettige S; Martin AJ
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2014 May; 156(5):989-98; discussion 998. PubMed ID: 24615066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Complications following pediatric cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a multicenter retrospective study.
Rocque BG; Agee BS; Thompson EM; Piedra M; Baird LC; Selden NR; Greene S; Deibert CP; Hankinson TC; Lew SM; Iskandar BJ; Bragg TM; Frim D; Grant G; Gupta N; Auguste KI; Nikas DC; Vassilyadi M; Muh CR; Wetjen NM; Lam SK
J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2018 Sep; 22(3):225-232. PubMed ID: 29882736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Skull Reconstruction Using a Custom-Made, Three-Dimensional-Printed, Hydroxyapatite-Titanium Cranioplasty Implant: Largest Single-Center U.S. Experience.
Sorek S; Miller A; Griepp D; Moawad S; Zanzerkia R; Rahme R
World Neurosurg; 2022 Nov; 167():e1387-e1394. PubMed ID: 36115561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cranioplasty complications following wartime decompressive craniectomy.
Stephens FL; Mossop CM; Bell RS; Tigno T; Rosner MK; Kumar A; Moores LE; Armonda RA
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 May; 28(5):E3. PubMed ID: 20568943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A case series of early and late cranioplasty-comparison of surgical outcomes.
Bjornson A; Tajsic T; Kolias AG; Wells A; Naushahi MJ; Anwar F; Helmy A; Timofeev I; Hutchinson PJ
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2019 Mar; 161(3):467-472. PubMed ID: 30715606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Calcium Phosphate Cement Cranioplasty Decreases the Rate of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak and Wound Infection Compared with Titanium Mesh Cranioplasty: Retrospective Study of 672 Patients.
Foster KA; Shin SS; Prabhu B; Fredrickson A; Sekula RF
World Neurosurg; 2016 Nov; 95():414-418. PubMed ID: 26921704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An algorithmic approach of reconstruction for cranioplasty failure: A case series.
Wang YC; Wu YC; Chang CW; Chung CL; Lee SS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Feb; 102(8):e33011. PubMed ID: 36827034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of polyetheretherketone and titanium cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy.
Thien A; King NK; Ang BT; Wang E; Ng I
World Neurosurg; 2015 Feb; 83(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 24909393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Timing of cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy for ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke.
Piedra MP; Ragel BT; Dogan A; Coppa ND; Delashaw JB
J Neurosurg; 2013 Jan; 118(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 23140156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cranioplasty with hydroxyapatite or acrylic is associated with a reduced risk of all-cause and infection-associated explantation.
Millward CP; Doherty JA; Mustafa MA; Humphries TJ; Islim AI; Richardson GE; Clynch AL; Gillespie CS; Keshwara SM; Kolamunnage-Dona R; Brodbelt AR; Jenkinson MD; Duncan C; Sinha A; McMahon CJ
Br J Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 36(3):385-393. PubMed ID: 35608052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [First Experience with Cranioplasty Using the Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Implant - Retrospective Five-Year Follow-up Study].
Šámal F; Ouzký M; Strnad J; Haninec P; Linzer P; Filip M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2019; 86(6):431-434. PubMed ID: 31941571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy. A prospective series analyzing complications and clinical improvement.
Paredes I; Castaño-León AM; Munarriz PM; Martínez-Perez R; Cepeda S; Sanz R; Alén JF; Lagares A
Neurocirugia (Astur); 2015; 26(3):115-25. PubMed ID: 25497290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Titanium cranioplasty in children and adolescents.
Williams L; Fan K; Bentley R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 44(7):789-94. PubMed ID: 27174495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of PMMA versus CaP titanium-enhanced implants for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a retrospective observational cohort study.
Wesp D; Krenzlin H; Jankovic D; Ottenhausen M; Jägersberg M; Ringel F; Keric N
Neurosurg Rev; 2022 Dec; 45(6):3647-3655. PubMed ID: 36222944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors related to failure of autologous cranial reconstructions after decompressive craniectomy.
van de Vijfeijken SECM; Groot C; Ubbink DT; Vandertop WP; Depauw PRAM; Nout E; Becking AG;
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Sep; 47(9):1420-1425. PubMed ID: 31353299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Timing of cranioplasty: a 10.75-year single-center analysis of 754 patients.
Morton RP; Abecassis IJ; Hanson JF; Barber JK; Chen M; Kelly CM; Nerva JD; Emerson SN; Ene CI; Levitt MR; Chowdhary MM; Ko AL; Chesnut RM
J Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 128(6):1648-1652. PubMed ID: 28799868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
