These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32215922)

  • 1. Response-reinforcer contiguity versus response-rate-reinforcer-rate covariance in rats' lever pressing: Support for a multiscale view.
    Baum WM; Aparicio CF
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 May; 113(3):530-548. PubMed ID: 32215922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response duration is sensitive to both immediate and delayed reinforcement.
    Byrne T; Sarno B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Jan; 111(1):94-115. PubMed ID: 30565230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response-food delay gradients for lever pressing and schedule-induced licking in rats.
    Pellón R; Pérez-Padilla A
    Learn Behav; 2013 Jun; 41(2):218-27. PubMed ID: 23271664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nondrug reinforcers contingent on alternative behavior or abstinence increase resistance to extinction and reinstatement of ethanol-maintained behavior.
    Craig AR; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2022 Nov; 118(3):353-375. PubMed ID: 36149379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acquisition of operant behavior in rats with delayed reinforcement: A retractable-lever procedure.
    McNamara AA; Johnson LE; Tate C; Chiang T; Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2015 Feb; 111():37-41. PubMed ID: 25464338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of delay of reinforcement on ABA renewal.
    Mateos Morfín LR; Flores C; Madrigal KD
    Behav Processes; 2021 Aug; 189():104440. PubMed ID: 34102272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Suppression of operant behavior and schedule-induced licking in rats.
    Bond NW; Blackman DE; Scruton P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Nov; 20(3):375-83. PubMed ID: 4759059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Matching, induction, and covariance with mixed response-contingent food and noncontingent food.
    Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2021 Jul; 116(1):21-43. PubMed ID: 33959964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Matching theory and induction explain operant performance.
    Baum WM; Grace RC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2020 Mar; 113(2):390-418. PubMed ID: 32037561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inactivation of dorsolateral striatum enhances sensitivity to changes in the action-outcome contingency in instrumental conditioning.
    Yin HH; Knowlton BJ; Balleine BW
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 166(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 16153716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does DRO type matter?: Cycle versus resetting contingencies in eliminating responding.
    Nighbor TD; Cook JE; Oliver AC; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2020 Dec; 181():104257. PubMed ID: 33002565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Control of response duration by delayed reinforcers: A systematic replication.
    Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2019 Oct; 167():103920. PubMed ID: 31374227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Behavioral momentum theory fails to account for the effects of reinforcement rate on resurgence.
    Craig AR; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 May; 105(3):375-92. PubMed ID: 27193242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resurgence of ethanol seeking following voluntary abstinence produced by nondrug differential reinforcement of other behavior.
    Craig AR; Agnew CN; Derrenbacker KE; Antúnez BA; Sullivan WE; Smith SW; DeBartelo J; Roane HS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2024 May; 121(3):314-326. PubMed ID: 38499477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resurgence and alternative-reinforcer magnitude.
    Craig AR; Browning KO; Nall RW; Marshall CM; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Mar; 107(2):218-233. PubMed ID: 28194793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement the outcome of an increase in overall activity or in operant responding?
    Weatherly JN; Arthur EI; Nurnberger JT
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jan; 133(1):97-111. PubMed ID: 16475671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response-reinforcer dependency and resistance to change.
    Cançado CRX; Abreu-Rodrigues J; Aló RM; Hauck F; Doughty AH
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):176-193. PubMed ID: 28817193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fix and sample with rats in the dynamics of choice.
    Aparicio CF; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):43-63. PubMed ID: 16903492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of temporal intervals on reinforcer accumulation.
    French EJ; Reilly MP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Nov; 108(3):351-366. PubMed ID: 29068053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of nucleus accumbens dopamine in responding on a continuous reinforcement operant schedule: a neurochemical and behavioral study.
    McCullough LD; Cousins MS; Salamone JD
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1993 Nov; 46(3):581-6. PubMed ID: 8278435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.